Один з адмінів в шоці с того, скільки людина закинула одним донатом😁 Дякую, за підтримку кожному❤️ Підписатись 😼 Підтримати
❤12
Channel
@cateyes_osint_new
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,587subscribers
+288 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003419254873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cateyes_osint_new |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cateyes_osint_new |
@cateyes_osint_new was previously reachable at these 2 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 4,587 | +191 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:05 | 4,396 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 4,393 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 4,393 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 4,401 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 4,404 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 4,408 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 4,409 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 4,402 | +17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 4,385 | +24 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 4,361 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 4,355 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 4,350 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 4,349 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 4,337 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 4,328 | +13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 4,315 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 4,315 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 4,301 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 4,299 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
380 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 123 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 118 | 31.1% | |
| 😁 | 50 | 13.2% | |
| 😭 | 35 | 9.21% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 4.47% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 2.63% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 2.11% | |
| 😐 | 5 | 1.32% | |
| custom 5397656409301079192 | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.789% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 0.789% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.526% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.263% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.263% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Один з адмінів в шоці с того, скільки людина закинула одним донатом😁 Дякую, за підтримку кожному❤️ Підписатись 😼 Підтримати
❤12
🔍 Китай, Гонконг і російські імпортери: як STM32 потрапляли до Росії після 2022 року Про західні компоненти у російській техніці написано багато. Але набагато складніше питання — як саме вони продовжують потрапляти до РФ попри експортні обмеження? У OSINT-дослідженні ми реконструювали один із таких ланцюгів на прикладі мікроконтролерів STM32. Аналіз митних даних, торговельних платформ, корпоративних реєстрів і санк…
❤8🔥6
🥷🏻 Сервіси перевірки витоків даних та їх видалення Best Free Data Breach Checker Tools — 12 найкращих безкоштовних інструментів для перевірки на витік даних. Це покроковий практичний посібник зі скріншотами про те, як користуватися кожним із цих інструментів і для яких категорій пошуку вони підходять. https://researchclinic.net/#Security — cервіси перевірки витоків даних — дізнайтеся, чи не потрапили ваші особисті …
❤17🔥6
OPSEC lvl 100 Краще ніж у деяких :D ©Lord S Підписатись 😼 Підтримати
😁46❤6custom 53976564093010791924🔥1
Аюб наш козак?😂 Підписатись 😼 Підтримати
🤣16❤6🤡1🙈1
І так, хто не встиг подивитись в Live, то вийшов вже сам відос: https://tv.equalit.ie/ru/video/recMJ0VkmCoH2w8cp/ 2 години запитань від Олександра та крінжу від мене😁 UPD: перезалив старого посту, т.я. малолєтній долб*еб почав крутити реакції, а інший долб*еб почав радіти цьому. Підписатись 😼 Підтримати
🔥35❤5👍5💩3😁3🤡2👎1
Вкрадене дитинство https://cateyesosint.com/publications/vkradene-dytynstvo #Загальні #роздуми Підписатись 😼 Підтримати
😭35💔8❤3
🫡 На зв'язку R.H.G ! 🫡 Заявляємо, що Ми отримали повний доступ до корпоративної пошти ГБУ РС(Я) "БТІ" та разом з нею до великої кількості довірених користувачів та прилеглих компаній, що дало доволі чудовий результат та змогу просунутись далі. Отримано : - Договори, акти виконаних робіт, оціночні документи та технічні паспорти на об'єкти нерухомості; - Повний дамп електронної пошти всіх співробітників БТИ (email, p…
❤27🔥12👍2😁1
Як вам вигляд сертифікату? Підписатись 😼 Підтримати
🔥42❤8😐5👍3🤣1
На связи фокстрот, сегодня поигрались немножко с военторгом https://voenpro[.]ru , бедолаги до сих пор лежат. Комбинация обычного, простого но максимально эффективного LFI + Nginx Log Poisoning дала нам прекрасный результат. База на 150к клиентов, ФИО, телефоны , почты , адреса , детали заказов , очень вкусная база где закупочки делают много потенциальных русских двухсотых. Базу не продаем , исключительно для своих …
❤31🔥16👀2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @cateyes_osint_new. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cat Eyes OSINT” (@cateyes_osint_new), 4,587 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cateyes_osint_new.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.