https://n.news.naver.com/article/031/0001055035 근데 이건 확인된 통계는 아닌 듯 합니다. 통계로 보면 50% 정도 올라온 것으로 확인 되는 것 같습니다. 그래도 이것도 많이 올라오긴 했네요.
❤6👍5
Signed 메이커 캐시

Channel
@cashmaker_moon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,869subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001912137012 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cashmaker_moon |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cashmaker_moon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 2,869 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 2,871 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:46 | 2,870 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:33 | 2,870 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 12,720 |
| Reactions total | 169 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
169 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 37.3% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 37.3% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 7.69% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 6.51% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 5.92% | |
| 🙊 | 4 | 2.37% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.78% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.592% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://n.news.naver.com/article/031/0001055035 근데 이건 확인된 통계는 아닌 듯 합니다. 통계로 보면 50% 정도 올라온 것으로 확인 되는 것 같습니다. 그래도 이것도 많이 올라오긴 했네요.
❤6👍5
Signed 메이커 캐시
https://www.donga.com/news/NewsStand/article/all/20260903/134595401/2 지지율 하락이 무섭긴 했나 봅니다.
👍7🙊4
Signed 메이커 캐시
Video, posted without a caption
Signed 메이커 캐시
아 형님 쫌......
😁8💯1
Signed 메이커 캐시
https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4433273
👏10😁2
Signed 관리자 캐시메이커
https://naver.me/xF4WUreN
Signed 관리자 캐시메이커
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/031/0001055030?sid=105 소부장 호재 1스택 또 적립
👍8
Signed 메이커 캐시
UBS가 요즘 신흥국시장 너무 집중됐다고 하네요... 우리나라를 필두로 중국,대만 증시 상황이 이러니 어쩔 수 없는 현상인거 같습니다.
Signed 메이커 캐시
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 메이커 캐시
다행히 나스닥 선물이나 유가는 별 반응하고 있지 않습니다.
Signed 메이커 캐시
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 쿠웨이트군 총참모부 2026년 9월 3일 목요일 쿠웨이트 방공망은 현재 적대적인 미사일 및 무인기 공격에 대응하고 있습니다. 쿠웨이트군 총참모부는 폭발음이 들릴 경우, 이는 방공체계가 적대적 표적을 요격하는 과정에서 발생한 것임을 알려드립니다. 국민 여러분께서는 관계 당국이 발표하는 안전 및 보안 지침을 준수해 주시기 바랍니다. 외신 텔레 난리
🔥8👏1
Signed 메이커 캐시
오늘은 반도체 빼고 나머지 섹터들이 힘을 쓰고 있네요. 뉴욕증시와 같이 쏠림이 완화되면서 순환매가 진행되는 모습니다. 아무래도 지수 플레이를 하는 펀드들 입장에서는 반도체 중심의 포트를 리밸런싱을 해야 하는데 삼전닉스가 자사주 매입을 해주고 있으니 이들 입장에서는 리밸런싱하기 좋은 타이밍이긴 하죠. 이런 순환매가 진행되면서 쏠림이 완화되면 추후 AI 2랠리가 왔을때 반도체 섹터는 좀 더 탄력을 붙일 수 있기 때문에 현재의 흐름을 부정적으로 볼 필요는 없습니다.
👍17
Signed 메이커 캐시
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cashmaker_moon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“문서진의 캐시메이커” (@cashmaker_moon), 2,869 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cashmaker_moon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.