Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вас настигла Кара

@caramar_about

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,046subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002001413474
TypeChannel
Username@caramar_about
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/caramar_about

Growth

2,0462,0512,048.56 August 2026 — 2,049 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,048 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,051 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,046 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,045–2,052 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:592,046-5
10 Aug 2026, 03:202,051+3
7 Aug 2026, 10:382,048-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:492,049first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.1%
avg views ÷ 2,046 subscribers
Avg views / post
657
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (1 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,851
Reactions total1,014
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 51s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,014 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
64263.3%
🔥13413.2%
🥰10310.2%
❤‍🔥333.25%
👏242.37%
🤣181.78%
😁131.28%
😢131.28%
🕊121.18%
💯80.789%
👀50.493%
😘50.493%
👍20.197%
🦄20.197%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,014reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @caramar_about. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC177 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оформила предзаказ на книгу своей подруженьки, что может быть лучше 🥰 Вы если детективы любите, любите отлично прописанных героев и просто хороший слог, оформляйте тоже, я вам клянусь, она пишет просто невероятно (помню после одного ее текста я поймала творческий кризис, потому что я тоже так хочу уметь) 😭😭😭

🔥10👏7🥰61

6 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC240 views117 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aftg_art

Представьте, вы работаете в элитнейшем автосалоне. Однажды к вам подъезжают двое студентов на каком-то прокатном ведре. Один — с тату на лице и надменным поведением знаменитости. Другой — безжизненный гот ростом с эльфа. Парень с тату говорит, что они не уедут без покупки, поэтому вы всё же показываете им несколько машин. Эльф не произносит ни слова за всё время, но явно всем заправляет. Он указывает на Мазерати и го

70🔥22🥰20😘5

6 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC165 views101 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @andian_panda

Эндрю Миньярд проживает жизнь так, как, по моим представлениям, живет персонаж без алмазов* в Клубе Романтики (*внутриигровая валюта, которую можно потратить на важные сюжетные выборы). Эндрю видит симпатичного парня: • сделай ему комплимент! • со всей дури заряди ему тяжеленной экси-клюшкой прямо в грудину и пялься на него гомосексуально Эндрю заинтересовался новеньким: • попросись встретить его в аэропорту! • п

67🥰19👏9❤‍🔥5🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC408 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nedostizhimolostVideo

с днем ai-слопа! наткнулись в ленте (моей) на эту хуйню, зачем-то не смогли пролистнуть ОСТОРОЖНО РАЗЖИЖАЕТ МОЗГИ далее тарантиновский диалог: кара: ты бы выбрала фембоя или кошкофембоя? я: кошкофембоя конечно, это прикольно и его теоретически можно кормить роял канином! кара: *проводит математические расчеты* кара: бляяяять, кошкофембою в среднем на один прием пищи нужно было бы 600-700 грамм роял канина я: 😐 я:

43🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC474 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Никто не сможет меня переубедить Давайте не забывать, кто из них заместитель капитана отряда рыцарей ордена, идущий на любые шаги для защиты Мондштадта и ставший экзаменатором, чтобы не допустить попадание в орден лентяев и пьяниц, а кто, весь из себя вежливый и предупредительный, стоит во главе тайной организации шпионов, наемников и убийц, которая, к слову, не чурается нанимать даже детей (Саю). Камисато Аято, я о

40😁10💯7

5 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,110 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ ☁️❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 ☁️☁️❤️‍🔥 ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ ☁️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⭕️⭕️⭕️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Новая глава на бусти! Читать можо по подписке или разово (80р пост). Читать здесь 🎞️Описание: Эндрю, конечно, понимает, что все это — очень плохая идея. И ему совсем, совсем не нравится происходящее, особенно когда он прекрасно понимает, чт

🔥199🥰2👀1

4 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC654 views126 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Маленький доп к #ксоксо с фестиваля "Сэнко" На входе Нил хватает Эндрю за руку, и тот бросает на него вопросительный взгляд. Еще бы. В машине Нил строил из себя недтрогу и едва из окна на капот не вылез, когда Эндрю попытался положить руку ему на колено. Во-первых, прощения Эндрю так быстро не получит, пусть не надеется даже, а, во-вторых, лучше бы на дорогу смотрел. — У них было двое суток на обмусоливание сплетен

71❤‍🔥27🤣18🔥7🦄2💯1

3 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC520 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Шестьдесят шесть

🥰126👀4🔥2🕊1

3 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC571 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Меня не отпускает Господи КАК ЖЕ СИЛЬНО я его люблю Мой любимый мужчина в геншине (Кадзуха не считается, он на особом месте и тут даже говорить не о чем) Боже я была обречена буквально в первую же долю секунды, когда его увидела девочки.... Кошмар

23🕊11😁3

2 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,410 views155 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 Приквел: О чудесах эквилибристики Эпилог: О нерушимой стойкости мира Перенесла две части Права с бусти на фикбук. Спасибо всем, кто поддержал это решение. Делюсь с вами огромной теплотой и любовью, которыми наполнена каждая буковка этих текстов Приятного чтения и с возвращением домой ❤️

95🥰31🔥28❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC590 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Шестьдесят пять

15🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @caramar_about. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 66,765 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вас настигла Кара” (@caramar_about), 2,046 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caramar_about.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.