Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᴄᴀᴘʀɪᴄᴄɪᴏsᴏ

Channel

ᴄᴀᴘʀɪᴄᴄɪᴏsᴏ

@capriccioco

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,783subscribers

+485 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001332309778
TypeChannel
Username@capriccioco
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/capriccioco

Growth

2,2612,7832,5227 August 2026 — 2,298 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,291 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,284 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,274 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,269 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,261 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,782 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,783 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net +485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,183–2,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 08:422,783+1
23 Aug 2026, 17:182,782+521
20 Aug 2026, 04:232,261-8
17 Aug 2026, 10:462,269-5
14 Aug 2026, 07:242,274-10
11 Aug 2026, 07:532,284-7
8 Aug 2026, 10:522,291-7
7 Aug 2026, 16:472,298first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 2,783 subscribers
Avg views / post
401
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,815
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC369 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не нужно людям искать оправданий — они поступают так, как считают нужным. Не нужно ждать от людей ни первых шагов, ни последних сообщений… Так или иначе, глупо отдавать Ваши решения в руки других людей. Ни выпрашивайте у человека ни его внимания, ни его любви, ни его жалости… Не топчите собственную самооценку об амбиции людей, которым абсолютно безразличны ваши чувства. Научитесь слушать себя: захотели — позвонили,

7 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC414 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Она сидела у окна, А он вошел в ее вагон. - Женат, - подумала она, - Лет тридцать пять, - подумал он. А за окном цвела весна, День был прекрасен, словно сон. - Красив, - подумала она. - Как хороша, - подумал он. Но жизнь событьями бедна, Он встал и вышел на перрон. - Как жаль! – Подумала она. - Как жаль! – Успел подумать он. А дома, сжав бокал вина, Включив любимый «Вальс-Бостон» - Одна. – Подумала она. - Один. – Вда

7 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC411 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Κ одиночecтву можно пpивыкнуть😌 Оно пугаeт только в cамом началe, когда eщe наcтойчиво давит на пcихику пpивычка быть с кeм-тo. Ηo спустя сoвсeм нeмнoгo вpeмeни, ты начинаeшь oщущать прeлeсти свoбoднoй жизни, осознавать её плюсы. Ты пpинадлeжишь сeбe, дeлаeшь только то, что хочeтся и нужно тeбe. Ты завиcишь тoлькo oт cебя, и единcтвенный, ктo мoжет тебя пoдвеcти, - этo ты.

7 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC416 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

​​Иметь с кем-то человеческие отношения — значит быть с ним на равных, говорить с ним доверительно помимо любви; и это тоже называется дружбой. Любовь без дружбы — это ужасно. Если человек влюблён лишь в собственное отражение в глазах другого — всё пойдет наперекосяк. Если любишь кого-то, любишь и его счастье. Когда любишь человека, который любит тебя, это предполагает и обязанности, и права — но прежде всего обязанн

7 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC419 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Только мужчина и его действия могут сделать женщину слабой или сильной. Даже самая сильная и независимая женщина оказавшись в руках достойного мужчины готова сложить своё оружие, убрать все иголки, и растаять. Но только у надежного и верного мужчины. А оказавшись рядом с предателем, рядом со слабым мужчиной, оказавшись на самом краю, как бы ни было тяжело и больно, в каких бы условиях ни оказалась женщина, она, собра

7 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC420 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется в отношениях всё просто. Если вы понимаете, что любите друг друга, значит нужно засунуть в жопу свою гордость и несмотря ни на что - ругань и прочую фигню, быть вместе. Если нет, то и переживать тут не о чем. Расставаться. Всё равно из таких отношений ничего не выйдет.

6 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC398 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если любишь кое-как, лучше вовсе не люби. Если она "просто так", лучше не лги ни себе, ни ей - не держи. Не храни её у себя как красивый, стильный аксессуар на выход. Не изолируй от воздуха, общества и красок мира, словно инфицированную. Она не на карантине у тебя и не стерилизованная. Если не любуешься, не наслаждаешься, не восхищаешься, если постоянно чем-то недоволен и только критикуешь, если все равно - открой кл

6 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC372 viewsread 7 August 2026

​​​​​​А нежность – это такая вещь, которая иногда просто спасает жизнь. Ее одной иногда достаточно для того, чтобы человек вдруг оттаял, вернул себе волю к жизни и совершенно по-другому ощутил этот мир – мир, которому естественно быть добрым и нежным Архимандрит Савва Мажуко

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @capriccioco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 875,168 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴄᴀᴘʀɪᴄᴄɪᴏsᴏ” (@capriccioco), 2,783 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/capriccioco.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.