Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LA RESISTENCIA de Josele Sánchez 📻 🎙️ PERIODISMO DE COMBATE

Channel

LA RESISTENCIA de Josele Sánchez 📻 🎙️ PERIODISMO DE COMBATE

@canaljoselesanchez

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,146subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657242722
TypeChannel
Username@canaljoselesanchez
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/canaljoselesanchez

Growth

6,1466,1626,1547 August 2026 — 6,162 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,162 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,160 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,149 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,148 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,146 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,144–6,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:236,146-2
14 Aug 2026, 03:376,148-1
11 Aug 2026, 05:376,149-11
8 Aug 2026, 06:056,160-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:306,162no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:236,162first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 6,146 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total5,185
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 40s
Average length
4m 25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11138.3%
👍9633.1%
🙏279.31%
🔥248.28%
🤬186.21%
👏72.41%
🤗31.03%
😱20.69%
🤯20.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC708 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

*🔥 VÍCTOR VICIEDO: “EL REY VA DESNUDO: LAS TRAMPAS DEL PACTO CLIMÁTICO”* En esta intervención, _*Víctor Viciedo, presidente de ALIV y ALVE,*_ pone sobre la mesa un debate que considera imprescindible: las causas reales de los incendios y el futuro del mundo rural. Con la metáfora del “rey desnudo”, Viciedo cuestiona que todo el debate se centre únicamente en la emergencia climática y reclama mirar también hacia la

👍3

2 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC817 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Pm_n_jlG1f8 🔥 LOS BULOS FORESTALES 🔥 (Desmontando las falsedades de la Ministra de Sanidad) 📖 BULO = "Noticia falsa propagada con algún fin" (RAE) Pero… ¿por qué hoy se utiliza tanto esta palabra? En este vídeo analizo las afirmaciones de la ministra sobre los incendios forestales y las confronto con la legislación, datos y opiniones de distintos expertos. 👇 ¿TÚ QUÉ PIENSAS? ¿Se llama "bulo" a cual

👍102👏1

28 Jul 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,190 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8eYjbFn/ 11.000 litros de Ecofire. Voluntarios que llegan para para trabajar: prevenir, proteger y apoyar las labores de extinción. Mientras quienes tienen la responsabilidad hacen una gestión nefasta de los incendios, el pueblo vuelve a hacer lo de siempre: organizarse, ponerse en pie y buscar soluciones. Pasó entre el barro. Está pasando entre las llamas. Cuando el poder abandona, el pueblo

18👍6

27 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,210 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @luzdetrentoPhoto

⚠️ Los bufones de los medios salen en tromba a desmentir que no se pueden limpiar los montes, que no hay proyectos de timorenovables y que no existe intervención del hombre para que brille la farsa del cambio climático del gobierno y el PP. ❌ ¡Sinvergüenzas! ¡No muerden la mano que les da de comer!

🤬11🔥6👍21

26 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC≈1,260 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @blancawhiteVideo

No necesitamos rumores ni silencio institucional. Necesitamos una investigación, pruebas y respuestas. ¿QUIÉN ESTÁ DANDO LAS ÓRDENES? https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8JVyWJo/

👍15🤬5

16 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,760 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

*✅(Entrevista a Víctor Viciedo a partir de 1h 11'):* *🚨🚨 ESCÁNDALO INACEPTABLE:* *MAPA Y MITECO DEJARON SIN EJECUTAR 8.907 MILLONES DE EUROS DESTINADOS AL SECTOR PRIMARIO* https://youtu.be/U831ZhnrUu8?si=FXgncgusm-qLs6TY *Te aconsejamos que lo veas completo.* *Víctor Viciedo,* presidente de *ALIV y ALIVE,* denuncia que el *Ministerio de Agricultura (MAPA)* y el *Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica (MITECO)* _*d

7👏3🙏1

16 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,190 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @blancawhitePhoto

Hoy quiero recordar a Josele. Al jefe. Pero, sobre todo, a mi maestro. Él me enseñó —y también me obligó— a contar la verdad sin regalarle a nadie la oportunidad de silenciarme en los tribunales. Me enseñó a investigar, a contrastar, a sostener cada palabra y a comprender que no basta con saber: hay que saber demostrar. Josele nos mostró a todos una de las verdades más turbias de nuestro mundo. La misma verdad que, d

27🙏17👍6

11 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,670 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Cuenta muertos. Sigue al dinero. Porque no son los que dicen y están pasando cosas extrañas a tu alrededor. No las verás si pierdes el tiempo viendo la tele.

9

11 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Los datos oficiales... Hay que pensar que se está muriendo mucha gente

9 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,640 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/T_3ICPhM340?si=PGYrCedgjj0opnfK *🕊️ ANIVERSARIO DE DAVID LAFOZ* Hoy recordamos a *David Lafoz*, un hombre que hizo del compromiso con el campo una forma de vida. 🚜 Un ejemplo de *valentía, solidaridad y espíritu de lucha.* 🌾 Un agricultor que nunca se resignó ante las injusticias que sufría el Sector Primario. 🤝 Un compañero que entendió que solo la unión y la defensa de nuestros derechos podían as

21🙏9👍1

8 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A ver quién puede ir. Difundirlo a familia y amigos. Hay copa después.

👍4

8 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,240 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.miciudadreal.es/2026/07/07/chamorro-vox-mantiene-una-reunion-de-trabajo-en-las-cortes-valencianas/ Chamorro (Vox) mantiene una reunión de trabajo en las Cortes Valencianas _*🌾 DAR CARACTER JURÍDICO A LA PREFERENCIA COMUNITARIA*_ 🚜 *ALIVE y ALIV* han redactado una Petición Europea para que en la UE se haga una Ley que le dé carácter Jurídico al Principio Fundacional de la UE de la *Preferencia Comunitari

👍61👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @canaljoselesanchez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LA RESISTENCIA de Josele Sánchez 📻 🎙️ PERIODISMO DE COMBATE” (@canaljoselesanchez), 6,146 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canaljoselesanchez.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.