Channel
@bx667777
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,647subscribers
-1,153 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002265590459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bx667777 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bx667777 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 2,647 | -54 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 2,701 | -123 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 2,824 | -90 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 2,914 | -303 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 3,217 | -135 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 3,352 | -225 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 3,577 | -199 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 3,776 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 3,800 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#小姐姐投稿：这个越南女人叫贝贝， 在木牌ktv 上班，三番两次和我男朋友要钱 知道他有女朋友的情况下还在勾搭他 ，要和他见面 ，你们越南女孩都是这样吗 ？看见道德底线都不要了？你还是他兄弟的前女友，逼逼那么痒吗？要不要姐姐买个自慰棒给你寄过去啊？那么喜欢抢男人 那你也挑个好点的抢吧 我和问他你不知道他有女朋友吗？叫我和他说话小声一点，现在做小三的都这么正大光明了吗？你很骚诶：谈完他兄弟 又找我男朋友，逼黏的都挂水了吧 我不是针对这个女生 ，我这个男朋友也有问题，不过现在已经分手了 ，你这样的行为真的很给越南女孩子丢脸 很给越南人减分， 你作为一个小三说话还理直气壮的 我叫你来找我你也不来找我，真的是欠操的话就去卖啊。 别想着不处理，或者这件事就这么了了。搞我就要接受被曝光，你不让我好过我就让你身败名裂，我把你之前发给我男朋友的裸体照和跟我开视频我录屏下来的都曝光能让更多人擦亮眼睛，不要再被“假感情”骗走真金白银。 📣 …
ps：大家出门在外一定要管好男朋友
#网友投稿：西港南海后面振兴大厦又被围起来了，上次已经围过一次了，在附近的注意了。 📣 关注东南亚华人（吃瓜）分享 ↓ 🔗 @bx667777 ➡️ 投稿联系： @beuchi001😅
柬警方要求私营保安人员积极举报网络诈骗 今天下午，柬埔寨国家警察总署私营安保管理局局长林苏卡拉斯美在第87期私营安保人员培训班闭幕式上指示，全体私营安保人员须密切配合警方，严厉打击网络诈骗。 林苏卡拉斯美指出，凡是外国人大量聚集、囤积大量电脑和手机且行为隐秘的地点均属可疑窝点，安保人员需立即上报。他严厉警告，安保人员绝不可与电诈分子勾结，严禁为其提供看守、庇护或充当“内鬼”监视警方执法。 他强调，政府已出台相关法令开展全国专项行动，誓将网诈彻底清除。安保行业作为维护社会治安的重要辅助力量，必须提升专业素质，共同落实“安全村社”政策，保障国家利益与安全。 保安：哎呀马呀， 那还能找到工作吗？？ 📣 关注东南亚华人（吃瓜）分享 ↓ 🔗 @bx667777 ➡️ 投稿联系： @beuchi001😅
#群友反馈：越南平新郡今晚有警察地毯式搜查，酒店，街上，私人住房会检查，公司已经通知全部撤离，准备跑路河内。 📣 关注东南亚华人（吃瓜）分享 ↓ 🔗 @bx667777 ➡️ 投稿联系： @beuchi001😅
#群友投稿：来柬埔寨一年，钱还没赚到，大半年都是在严打。本来还有个吃饭睡觉的地方，公司现在搬到胡志明去，我没护照，不能坐飞机，给了二百美金遣散费，让我自己找下家。 现在钱也花没了，刚买了1美金的本地鸡腿饭、0.25美金的矿泉水，和本地柬埔寨大妈一起躺在路边挂B，睡觉的毯子都没有一个。这波严打真是给我们底层狗推坑惨了，有时候我真的在想，是不是被抓了都比我现在的日子舒服些。。。。。。。。。。 📣 关注东南亚华人（吃瓜）分享 ↓ 🔗 @bx667777 ➡️ 投稿联系： @beuchi001😅
#越南资讯：胡志明市庆会坊加强外国人住宿检查 17套公寓未申报暂住登记遭处罚 为持续推进为期45天的社会治安专项整治行动，并落实建设“无毒品社区”目标，2026年6月24日晚，胡志明市庆会坊（Khánh Hội）警方联合相关执法力量，对辖区外国人住宿管理情况开展集中检查，重点排查外国人聚集居住场所及可能存在违法行为的区域。 此次行动共出动50余名公安干部和警员，以及40名基层治安维护人员，组成9个专项工作组，对辖区内住宿场所开展出入境管理及行政执法检查。 其中，位于庆会坊云屯码头街151至155号的RiverGate Residence公寓，因长期有大量外国人居住，被列为本次行动的重点检查对象。警方认为，该区域存在一定社会治安风险隐患，因此进行了全面排查。 执法过程中，警方共检查110套公寓，发现其中17套公寓未按越南法律规定为外国住客办理暂住登记手续，相关责任人依法受到行政处罚。 警方表示，此次行动再次彰显越南执法部…
#马来西亚资讯：马六甲警方捣毁跨国股票投资诈骗集团 31名中韩籍嫌疑人落网 马来西亚马六甲警方成功捣毁一个专门针对中国及韩国民众实施股票投资诈骗的跨国犯罪集团，行动中共逮捕31名外籍嫌疑人，包括1名韩国籍女子及30名中国籍男子，并查获大批电脑、手机等涉案设备。 马六甲州总警长拿督祖凯里慕克达于6月25日召开新闻发布会表示，此次行动由马六甲商业罪案调查组联合中央县刑事罪案调查组展开。执法人员于6月22日下午4时30分，突击搜查位于吉里望（Klebang）一处单层独立洋房，成功捣毁该诈骗窝点。 警方介绍，被捕的31名嫌疑人年龄介于20岁至40岁之间，均持旅游签证入境马来西亚，已在马六甲活动约两个月。目前，所有嫌疑人已被延长扣留至6月26日，以协助进一步调查。 调查显示，该诈骗集团主要锁定中国及韩国民众作案。他们先邀请受害者加入Telegram投资交流群，在群内发布高回报股票投资广告，并诱导受害者下载名为“HANWHA”的投资…
汇旺又在搞登记，要不要去？ 你不是秒赚百万，反正现在生意不好，如果是官方的登记，当然可以去，死马当活马医，人生总要有点希望不是吗？ 如果登记还要钱，坚决不要给，柬埔寨处处都是盘，这叫汇旺登记盘，横竖有人赚。 没记错的话，4个多月前，柬央行也搞过登记，登记的那些人，都领到钱了吗？有希望是好事，但别太过于沉迷这份希望，生活还得继续。 去年凭空搞出个H-Pay，就是汇旺金蝉脱壳，剥离烂账准备另外起盘，所以开了H-Pay。可后来形势急转直下，H-Pay怕是也玩不下去了。 所以，汇旺的单算，还是绑着H-Pay一起算，都只是概念问题。 要找就找to哥，敢和to哥拼一拼吗？ 📣 关注东南亚华人（吃瓜）分享 ↓ 🔗 @bx667777 ➡️ 投稿联系： @wenrou456😅
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bx667777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 494,572 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bx667777 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件丨央视新闻丨日报联播” (@bx667777), 2,647 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bx667777.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.