7 Apr 2022, 08:58 UTC106 viewsread 22 August 2026
"Public" hey jangan jadi alergi fakta deh disitu udah jelas lu bilang " siapa cepat dia dapat"
Channel
BUKTI.
@buktiweel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001719721191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @buktiweel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 7 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/buktiweel |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 5
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
7 Apr 2022, 08:55 UTC106 viewsread 22 August 2026
Ga percaya lu bisa cek ig @ofcweskal
7 Apr 2022, 08:55 UTC106 viewsread 22 August 2026
Siapa cepat dia dapat kan? Ya ini gua lebih unggul 14 minggu daripada kalian
7 Apr 2022, 08:22 UTC113 viewsread 22 August 2026
Dan itu udah jadi tanda kita mau nge lock. logika aja orang nanya berarti ada maksud tertentu.
7 Apr 2022, 08:22 UTC110 viewsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @bocahweskal
166 gada yang lock sok tau l bel
7 Apr 2022, 08:22 UTC109 viewsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @bocahweskal
166 gd yg lock kan?
7 Apr 2022, 08:22 UTC110 viewsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @bocahweskal
gada
7 Apr 2022, 08:21 UTC112 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo
ini ga ada kata locked tapi bisa di lihat siapa yang duluan make 166 trimakasih.
7 Apr 2022, 05:06 UTC108 viewsread 22 August 2026
masih kurang lagi hum?
7 Apr 2022, 05:06 UTCviews —
BUKTI. pinned «BUKA MATA BAIK BAIK.»
7 Apr 2022, 05:04 UTC108 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo
jejak digital gak akan pernah hilang bahkan tanggal 21 feb tepatnya jam 8:37 weel pertama kali promote open link di lpm send bio,bisa lu cari awal awal dn 166 di lpm ini .
7 Apr 2022, 05:01 UTC104 viewsread 22 August 2026
dan 1 lagi kita nge locked udah dari https://t.me/ofcweskal/79 agustus 2021 kalo lu bilang itu di edited berarti lu harus liat pemakaian 166 udah dari kapan https://t.me/buktiweel/6 balik lagi kesini.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @buktiweel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,117,164 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“BUKTI.” (@buktiweel). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buktiweel.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.