The algorithms tell is when and where price stops. First TP hit then rest stopped in profit after a deep retracement followed by consolidation around the opening price. $NQ Long 7th of August 2026
π₯6

Channel
@broxmmxm
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
2,062subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002635483005 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @broxmmxm |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/broxmmxm |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 2,062 | +4 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 2,058 | -5 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 2,063 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 2,065 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 2,071 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:03 | 2,072 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 2,077 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 2,081 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 2,087 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 2,081 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 2,083 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 2,084 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 2,085 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 2,086 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
287 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 134 | 46.7% | |
| β€ | 123 | 42.9% | |
| π | 20 | 6.97% | |
| π | 4 | 1.39% | |
| π€© | 4 | 1.39% | |
| π | 1 | 0.348% | |
| π€― | 1 | 0.348% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 287 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The algorithms tell is when and where price stops. First TP hit then rest stopped in profit after a deep retracement followed by consolidation around the opening price. $NQ Long 7th of August 2026
π₯6
Anything price related is derived from specific time based grids. 56 to 14 confirming the retracement back towards 50% of the macro range. Key levels are only key because of time. $NQ Short 4th of August 2026
π₯9β€6π1
New month new trading opportunities. 47 high to a 50 retracement into the NYO. Rejection of the level and immediate rebalance entry according to the Codex. $NQ Long 3rd of August 2026
β€9π₯5
Todayβs reversal points being called out to the tick an hour in advance. Same model resulting in same results for todayβs setup. That is what being in sync is all about.
π₯16β€7π3π€―1
Liquidity matters not because of the place it formed, but at which time it formed. Notice the low that was put in prior to the run higher, then at what time the candle that took out the previous days high formed at. This is an algo reset. $NQ Short 30th of July 2026
β€11π₯8π2
Immediate rebalance candles are one of the visually strongest signs of upcoming expansion. Midpoint of AOI being reached at CE time. That's what provided the signal to watch for a potential setup. $NQ Long 29th of July 2026
π₯15β€3π1
If you were to look into the first imbalance that gets created from every expansion you'd be amazed. Trading a subtraction 35 low knowing CE would likely deliver. $NQ Long 23rd of July 2026
π₯16β€5π3π1
The reason you wait for a liquidity sweep is to either confirm a previous reference point or get a new one. Calling the low (11) of the session then holding for the high. $NQ Long 21st of July 2026
β€15π₯4π1
Just released a video on my personal prop firm payout strategy. Hopefully this is insightful to those still striving for that first payout or trying to be more consistent, as adapting this strategy/mindset helped me a lot
β€24π₯7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnnqZk5sXbc
β€19π€©4π2
Time is not random, it has an adjusted buffer for added "randomness". Study the time of the high and see why the reversal from the long decided it was a 14 and not 17. $NQ Short 16th of July 2026
π₯16β€2π1
Two sells taken using the exact same model. That's the Codex. Price opens provide the framework, while time projects every swing. Simple as that when you know what to look for. $NQ Shorts 15th of July 2026
β€15π₯6π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @broxmmxm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBROX π§ͺβ (@broxmmxm), 2,062 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/broxmmxm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.