Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Breaches

Channel

Breaches

@breaches

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,643subscribers

-1,667 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003468046329
TypeChannel
Username@breaches
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/breaches

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8130,73915,4109 August 2026 — 3,310 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,288 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,458 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,739 subscribers17 August 2026 — 81 subscribers24 August 2026 — 429 subscribers1 September 2026 — 605 subscribers10 September 2026 — 780 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,188 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,314 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,462 subscribers15 October 2026 — 1,497 subscribers18 October 2026 — 1,530 subscribers22 October 2026 — 1,600 subscribers25 October 2026 — 1,643 subscribers1,6439 August 202625 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 77 days, net -1,667. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 03:181,643+43
22 Oct 2026, 07:581,600+70
18 Oct 2026, 23:461,530+33
15 Oct 2026, 13:141,497+35
12 Oct 2026, 13:561,462+148
6 Oct 2026, 00:411,314+126
28 Sept 2026, 12:361,188+408
10 Sept 2026, 20:22780+175
1 Sept 2026, 05:35605+176
24 Aug 2026, 06:46429+348
17 Aug 2026, 13:0881-30,658
16 Aug 2026, 02:3630,739+27,281
12 Aug 2026, 20:373,458+170
10 Aug 2026, 03:403,288-22
9 Aug 2026, 04:163,310first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 58 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC209 viewsread 16 August 2026

2k for LiteLLM and Trivy, 5k for CheckMarx and Miasma each

Signed HasanBroker

16 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC244 viewsread 16 August 2026

Selling logs from the following supply chain attacks: 1. Trivy & LiteLLM 2. Checkmarx 3. Miasma: the spreading blight

Signed HasanBroker

16 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC265 viewsread 16 August 2026
Poll

Should we let diencracked back on the forum?

  1. Yes41%
  2. No59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed HasanBroker

16 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC50 viewsread 16 August 2026

Major Update 🚨 We’ve received some complaints that the channel would occasionally get spammed with multiple price updates. We’ve identified the issue in the code and made a major update to fix it. The bot has been improved to prevent duplicate/spam messages and keep the updates running on the correct schedule. ⏱ We’ve also updated the message format to make it cleaner: 🪙 $409.96 @xmrprice 🔽 🪙 $410.17 @xmrprice 🔼 …

Signed Monero Price

15 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC480 viewsread 16 August 2026

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I confirm this is diencracked, the official operator of dien.pw. I am announcing my permanent retirement on all channels, I no longer am with any type of BreachForums, including Breached, or other versions. This name, diencracked, will be retired along, and i can confirm i am no longer involved with any type of activities For your information, the breached[.]su datab…

Signed R

15 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC328 viewsread 16 August 2026

I will just post things in @bredox from here nobody cares about this

Signed HasanBroker

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @breaches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTCAnonymous Poll54 voters

Should we let diencracked back on the forum?

  1. Yes41%
  2. No59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTCAnonymous Poll51 voters

Do you want a discord server?

  1. Yes47%
  2. No53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Breaches” (@breaches), 1,643 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breaches.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.