Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В чём сила?!

Channel

В чём сила?!

@bratpravda

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

27,711subscribers

+9,844 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002966560481
TypeChannel
Username@bratpravda
DescriptionСила в тебе👊🏼 Подпишись! Слушать Радио: https://brat2.page.radio/ Сайт: https://vchemsila.org/ ТikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@bratcode2 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BratCode2 ВК:https://vk.com/club240232793 По сотрудничеству пишите @bratcode4
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 October 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/bratpravda

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

70.3 average views per post against 27,711 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.254%. Across the 6,403 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,168–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.57% and 23.8%, with a median of 11.8%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 September 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Posts measured55 of 55 published in the window (55 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,866
Mature posts only0.26% over 53 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers27,711 measured 16 October 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 6,403 channels · p10 2.70% · p25 5.57% · p50 11.8% · p75 23.8% · p90 48.1%
Position in cohort0.469th percentile · 1/45 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 17 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

17,72232,11624,9196 August 2026 — 17,867 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,862 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,843 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,829 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,813 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,803 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,794 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,786 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,771 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,742 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,731 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,730 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,722 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,869 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,848 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,809 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,971 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,969 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,954 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,948 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,939 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,920 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,904 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,898 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,885 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,855 subscribers5 September 2026 — 20,842 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,787 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,737 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,714 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,685 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,657 subscribers18 September 2026 — 26,375 subscribers25 September 2026 — 26,227 subscribers3 October 2026 — 32,116 subscribers8 October 2026 — 31,979 subscribers12 October 2026 — 27,771 subscribers14 October 2026 — 27,753 subscribers15 October 2026 — 27,730 subscribers16 October 2026 — 27,711 subscribers27,7116 August 202616 October 2026
40 measurements spanning 71 days, net +9,844. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,563–34,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Oct 2026, 10:0727,711-19
15 Oct 2026, 10:1827,730-23
14 Oct 2026, 09:4027,753-18
12 Oct 2026, 20:1027,771-4,208
8 Oct 2026, 06:4031,979-137
3 Oct 2026, 20:3732,116+5,889
25 Sept 2026, 03:5626,227-148
18 Sept 2026, 18:2026,375+5,718
16 Sept 2026, 13:2020,657-28
14 Sept 2026, 15:0020,685-29
12 Sept 2026, 23:2220,714-23
11 Sept 2026, 00:5620,737-50
8 Sept 2026, 01:3620,787-55
5 Sept 2026, 00:4020,842-13
3 Sept 2026, 11:0120,855-30
2 Sept 2026, 06:1420,885-13
1 Sept 2026, 04:1820,898-6
31 Aug 2026, 06:1820,904-16
30 Aug 2026, 03:0420,920-19
29 Aug 2026, 02:4420,939first reading

Engagement

137 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.254%
avg views ÷ 27,711 subscribers
Avg views / post
70.3
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 137 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held137 (31 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total3,866
Reactions total268
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Oct 2026, 19:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
728
Videos
258
Links
328

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3h 08m
Average length
3m 03s

Measured directly from 62 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

682 reactions across 120 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤29242.8%
🔥13319.5%
👍527.62%
❤‍🔥416.01%
🥰375.43%
😁304.40%
😢263.81%
👏243.52%
🕊121.76%
😭91.32%
🙏91.32%
🤬71.03%
⚡30.44%
🙉30.44%
🗿20.293%
💯10.147%
🤔10.147%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 137 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 682 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2026, 15:23 UTC16 viewsread 16 October 2026
Video

👐🏼 Рубрика "По факту". Сводка новостей: В поисках правды 👐🏼 Более подробно о новостях мира слушайте на радио "Брат-2" или смотрите полный выпуск:https://youtu.be/nVO0aS3u3DI Сила — в правде. Держимся вместе и остаемся на связи! ❤️

16 Oct 2026, 09:53 UTC29 views6 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

«— А это кто? — Свой. — Свой? «Свой своему поневоле брат» — народная фашистская поговорка. Фашист. — Данила. Немец? — Русский. — Вообще-то у меня дед на войне погиб. — Бывает...»

👍4❤2

14 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTC38 viewsread 16 October 2026
Video

👐🏼 Рубрика "По факту". Сводка новостей: В поисках правды 👐🏼 Более подробно о новостях мира слушайте на радио "Брат-2" или смотрите полный выпуск:https://youtu.be/h5S-lyJH3Ys Сила — в правде. Держимся вместе и остаемся на связи! ❤️

13 Oct 2026, 09:43 UTC50 views6 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

«— Тебя как звать-то? — Мерилин. — А это по-русски как? — Даша.»

❤4🕊2

12 Oct 2026, 20:20 UTC51 viewsread 16 October 2026
Video

👐🏼 Рубрика "По факту". Сводка новостей: В поисках правды 👐🏼 Более подробно о новостях мира слушайте на радио "Брат-2" или смотрите полный выпуск:https://youtu.be/G-A0VJdbcEw Сила — в правде. Держимся вместе и остаемся на связи! ❤️

12 Oct 2026, 12:34 UTC54 views6 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

легендарный момент

❤‍🔥5❤1

9 Oct 2026, 21:53 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

👐🏼 Рубрика "По факту". Сводка новостей: В поисках правды 👐🏼 Более подробно о новостях мира слушайте на радио "Брат-2" или смотрите полный выпуск:https://youtu.be/7DdDQ6xpVvc Сила — в правде. Держимся вместе и остаемся на связи! ❤️

❤3

9 Oct 2026, 08:28 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

«— Подождёшь пять минут, я за товарищем зайду? — Таких придурков даже бабы не ждут.»

😁6❤‍🔥1

8 Oct 2026, 16:41 UTC78 viewsread 16 October 2026
Video

👐🏼 Рубрика "По факту". Сводка новостей: В поисках правды 👐🏼 Более подробно о новостях мира слушайте на радио "Брат-2" или смотрите полный выпуск:https://youtu.be/OKkL6mZjqp4 Сила — в правде. Держимся вместе и остаемся на связи! ❤️

Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @bratpravda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bratpravda edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTCAnonymous Quiz30 voters

Что Данила сказал негру-сутенеру, когда забирал Дашу (Мэрилин) перед вылетом на Родину?

  1. 🔘 «Мы заберем своё»27%
  2. 🔘 «Мальчик, водочки нам принеси, мы домой летим»3%
  3. 🔘 «Вы мне гады еще за Севастополь ответите!»13%
  4. 🔘 «Узнал меня?»57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В чём сила?!” (@bratpravda), 27,711 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bratpravda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.