Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brashop.ru

Channel

Brashop.ru

@brashop_ru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

27,938subscribers

-316 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001350023415
TypeChannel
Username@brashop_ru
DescriptionBrashop.ru Шоу-рум белья и купальников больших размеров: обзоры, советы, фото и видео отзывы клиентов. @brashop_support - онлайн консультации Ресурс внесён в перечень Роскомнадзора: https://clck.ru/3J62CV.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/brashop_ru

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

27,93828,25428,0967 August 2026 — 28,254 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,245 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,232 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,226 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,223 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,221 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,205 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,192 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,185 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,174 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,160 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,157 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,144 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,122 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,112 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,105 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,100 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,087 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,079 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,081 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,079 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,067 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,057 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,082 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,081 subscribers7 September 2026 — 28,061 subscribers10 September 2026 — 28,055 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28,042 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,032 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,028 subscribers1 October 2026 — 27,969 subscribers6 October 2026 — 27,944 subscribers10 October 2026 — 27,938 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 64 days, net -316. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,891–28,301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 15:1527,938-6
6 Oct 2026, 11:1827,944-25
1 Oct 2026, 12:5527,969-59
18 Sept 2026, 07:2228,028-4
16 Sept 2026, 00:1828,032-10
12 Sept 2026, 19:1528,042-13
10 Sept 2026, 19:4128,055-6
7 Sept 2026, 19:5928,061-20
4 Sept 2026, 21:5928,081-1
3 Sept 2026, 06:5728,082+25
1 Sept 2026, 21:5428,057-10
31 Aug 2026, 19:4828,067-12
30 Aug 2026, 19:1328,079-2
29 Aug 2026, 17:1828,081+2
28 Aug 2026, 17:4328,079-8
27 Aug 2026, 19:0428,087-3
26 Aug 2026, 17:2328,090-10
25 Aug 2026, 17:1628,100-5
24 Aug 2026, 20:0928,105-7
23 Aug 2026, 03:5828,112first reading

Engagement

117 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 27,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,830
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 117 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held117 (24 July 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total164,828
Reactions total3,569
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,500
Videos
≈1,680
Links
≈2,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
56m 42s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,895 reactions across 116 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5,38149.4%
❤2,41322.1%
👍9408.63%
😍8748.02%
❤‍🔥4534.16%
👏3112.85%
😢1681.54%
😁1581.45%
🥰870.799%
👎850.78%
🙏250.229%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,895 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 116 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brashop_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 117 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 14:56 UTC998 views33 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

И НЕ СКАЖЕШЬ что это домашний комплект, а это домашний 😉 CURVY KATE ZEN теперь банановый в ярком сочном красном ❤️❤️❤️

😍15🔥11❤4❤‍🔥2😁1

12 Oct 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,780 views32 reactionsread 12 October 2026

АТАКА НА БЮСТГАЛЬТЕРЫ На дата-центры Яндекса идут атаки — уже третий ЦОД за неделю. Это крупнейший сбой в рунете за последнее время, задело десятки сервисов. Задело и нас. Что это значит для вас прямо сейчас: • Письма с подтверждением заказа могут не приходить — рассылки временно приостановлены, подключаем запасной канал. При этом заказ оформляется — это мы уже починили. Просто не ждите письма, оно придёт позже • …

❤28😢3👍1

11 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈2,520 views60 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥39❤12❤‍🔥5👎3😍1

11 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈2,420 views8 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Scantilly Laced Up - очень 🔥

👍6❤2

11 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,570 views60 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥37👍14❤5❤‍🔥2👎2

11 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,520 views12 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Новый яркий домашний Curvy Kate Zen 😍😍😍

❤9👍3

11 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,550 views93 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥62❤16👍10👎2👏2❤‍🔥1

11 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,470 views10 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Съемочного вайба вам в ленту 😍 Лиана, Настя и новинка - боди Scantilly Swerve 🔥

❤10

10 Oct 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,850 views86 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

КРУГЛЯШ ПРЯМ 🔥 #ВАУ_ЛЮДА и наш сегодняшний небанальный базовый ELOMI KINTAI Как всегда все весело, честно, подробно, наглядно 😍

🔥60❤‍🔥11❤7👍5👏3

10 Oct 2026, 12:16 UTC≈2,810 views55 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Впервые мы решили не разбивать видео отзывы на отдельные посты - ну зачем спамить количеством сообщений, если можно за один раз показать все отзывы и создать полноценное мнение о бюстгальтере сразу 😉 ELOMI KINTAI

❤34🔥17👍3❤‍🔥1

10 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC≈2,950 views74 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

СЕКСУАЛЬНЫЙ БРОНЕЖИЛЕТ Суббота, ваши отзывы, но не только. Мы как обычно сняли очередной сюжет #ВАУ_ЛЮДА в Elomi Kintai и вчера в чате прилетел комментарии на старое видео Оли в Kintai Вот этот хочу! Что за модель? И правильно делаете, что хотите, потому что его нельзя не хотеть - он шикарен во всем - небанальная база (дизайн), самые мягкие ткани, отличная поддержка и форма груди. Кроме того - этот бюстгальтер как…

🔥42❤22👏5👍4❤‍🔥1

9 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC≈3,120 views124 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

СПИНА ПОМНИТ Это видео набрало больше двух миллионов просмотров в запрещенной сети. Два миллиона. Для ролика про бельё без белья в кадре — это не «завирусилось», это попало в нерв. А суть там одна фраза: — Ты носишь оверсайз, чтобы скрыть объёмы? — Нет. Для этого я горблюсь. Два миллиона просмотров — потому что миллионы женщин узнали себя в этих словах. И почти никто не называет это вслух. Девочка растёт. Грудь п…

❤88🔥24👍8😁3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @brashop_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@brashop_ru edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brashop.ru” (@brashop_ru), 27,938 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brashop_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.