Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мозг💡Принятие решений

@brain_eremina

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,559subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002081029137
TypeChannel
Username@brain_eremina
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/brain_eremina

Growth

1,55910 Aug 2026, 21:46 — 1,559 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:51 — 1,559 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 21:4611 Aug 2026, 04:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,557–1,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:511,559no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:461,559first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 1,559 subscribers
Avg views / post
267
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (6 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total802
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

329 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14845.0%
9428.6%
😁3711.2%
💯309.12%
👏113.34%
❤‍🔥82.43%
💔10.304%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC274 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Да, действительно, люди с высоким серотонином обычно стоят выше по иерархической лестнице. Ведь этот нейромедиатор напрямую связан с социальным статусом: он снижает уровень тревожности и импульсивности, делая поведение уверенным и спокойным. Высокий серотонин избавляет от суетливости, выпрямляет осанку и транслирует окружающим авторитет. В то время как низкий серотонин запускает режим подчинения, страха и фонового

😁13👏54🔥3💯2

6 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC272 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В саванне случился скандал века. Молодая львица без лишних церемоний запрыгнула на спину вожака и развалилась там, как на дорогом диване. Остальные львицы прайда тут же зашипели снизу: — Ты страх потеряла? Слезь с царя, кошачья твоя морда! Сейчас он тебе устроивит сеанс принудительной субординации! Вожак, вопреки прогнозам, лишь лениво зевнул и даже не пошевелился. Львица ответила: — Девочки, выдыхайте. Учите мат

🔥17😁52

6 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC256 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Если вы хотите быть, как кот из предыдущего поста: спокойным, уверенным и постигшим дзен - у меня для вас посты про серотонин. Сначала притча про льва и львицу и про роль серотонина в социальной иерархии (ага, не знали этого, да?) Потом про нейробиологию серотонина в организме человека. А потом про кулинарную приправу шафран. Это будет самое интересное.

7🔥6

8 Jun 2026, 15:17 UTC821 views85 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Дофамин — это собака: «Мячик?! Где?! Погнали! О, палка! О, белка! О, новый запах! Жизнь — невероятное приключение! Хочу! Дай! Ещё! Быстрее! Как же интересно жить!» Серотонин — это кот: «Я постиг высший уровень дзена. Этот мир мне абсолютно понятен. Вселенная пребывает в равновесии. Солнце греет. Суета бессмысленна. Меня всё устраивает». Или ещё более лаконично: Дофамин — это собака: «Ура! Что-то происходит!» Серото

🔥54😁1512❤‍🔥4

2 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTC865 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Дорогие родители подростков! Вот здесь я писала, что происходит в мозге в пубертатный период, и почему любимый ребенок вдруг стал «весь такой ершистый»… …а сегодня хочу пригласить вас на бесплатный мастер-класс для родителей подростков "Раскрой скрытый талант ". Мастер-класс будет полезен родителям тех подростков, которые к 14–16 годам всё ещё не понимают, кем хотят быть. И все чаще отмахиваются: «Я не знаю», «Мне

10🔥5

28 May 2026, 13:47 UTC751 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @neurocampus2030Photo

😁 Друзья, уже в эту пятницу, 29 мая в 16:00, состоится День открытых дверей магистерских программ Нейрокампуса! Приглашаем вас на День открытых дверей, где мы подробно вам расскажем и покажем то, как протекает научная жизнь студентов Нейрокампуса! Вас ждет: ⏩Экскурсия по ФГБУ “ФЦМН” ФМБА России; ⏩Выступления преподавателей курсов; ⏩Экскурсия по лабораториям и знакомство с текущими исследованиями; ⏩Знакомство с экоси

5

26 May 2026, 14:22 UTC644 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026

(начало выше) Как работает ТМС? Над определённой областью головы размещают катушку, которая создаёт короткие магнитные импульсы. Эти импульсы проходят через кости черепа и вызывают очень слабые электрические токи в поверхностных слоях мозга. Сам мозг электрический орган - нейроны постоянно обмениваются электрическими сигналами, и ТМС как будто слегка «подталкивает» или, наоборот, «успокаивает» активность отдельных н

🔥12👏42❤‍🔥2

26 May 2026, 14:20 UTC416 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Можно ли «перенастроить» мозг? или Будем лечить депрессию магнитом у головы Представьте обычный магнит и рассыпанные на столе металлические скрепки: стоит провести магнитом рядом - и они начинают смещаться, выстраиваться, менять своё положение, хотя вы к ним даже не прикасались. Вот такую аналогию я использую, чтобы рассказать про транскраниальную магнитную стимуляцию мозга (ТМС). Здесь к голове прикладывается кат

🔥53

20 May 2026, 14:37 UTC564 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

И еще два китайских слова, «мэй» и «чоу». Одно означает «красивый», а другое — «уродливый»

  1. «мэй» - уродливый, «чоу» - красивый8%
  2. «мэй» - красивый, «чоу» - уродливый92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 May 2026, 14:29 UTC562 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Вот два китайских слова: «цин» и «джун». Одно означает «легкий», другое - «тяжелый».

  1. «цин» - тяжелый, «джун» - легкий17%
  2. «цин» - легкий, «джун» - тяжелый83%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 May 2026, 14:24 UTC536 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Правильный ответ: «буба» - округлая и слева, «кики» - колючая и справа. Ну что, угадали? Скорее всего, да, потому что 90% опрошенных из совершенно разных уголков земного шара считают именно так. Последние исследования этого эффекта показали, что даже дети в возрасте ~2,5 года (не умеющие читать) показывают аналогичные результаты. Вот такой интересный нейрологический феномен. Называется синестезия. Когда слова букв

🔥12😁42

20 May 2026, 14:23 UTC567 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Где «буба», а где «кики»?

  1. «Буба» слева, а «Кики» справа91%
  2. «Кики» слева, а «Буба» справа9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @brain_eremina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 May 2026, 14:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz177 voters

И еще два китайских слова, «мэй» и «чоу». Одно означает «красивый», а другое — «уродливый»

  1. «мэй» - уродливый, «чоу» - красивый8%
  2. «мэй» - красивый, «чоу» - уродливый92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 May 2026, 14:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz176 voters

Вот два китайских слова: «цин» и «джун». Одно означает «легкий», другое - «тяжелый».

  1. «цин» - тяжелый, «джун» - легкий17%
  2. «цин» - легкий, «джун» - тяжелый83%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 May 2026, 14:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz176 voters

Где «буба», а где «кики»?

  1. «Буба» слева, а «Кики» справа91%
  2. «Кики» слева, а «Буба» справа9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Книги Флибуста 📕 Аудиокниги
@flibustabooks · 151,132
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
Аудиокниги
@AUDIOKNIGI_CHANNEL · 256,850
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мозг💡Принятие решений” (@brain_eremina), 1,559 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brain_eremina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.