Channel
@bowod
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,349subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001282009569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bowod |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bowod |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @zpmods | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @zpmods (11–1) |
| @skkkxx | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 March 2025 to 23 April 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @zpmods. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 1,349 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 1,346 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 1,346 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 37.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 23 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 رسم بمبلغ 25 دولار! 🎉 أعزائي المشتركين! 🌟 يسعدنا أن نعلن عن سحبنا الجديد حيث لديك فرصة للفوز بـ 250 دولارًا! 💵 شروط المشاركة: - اشترك في قناة شركائنا 📰 - أعجبك هذا المنشور ❤️ - سيختار الروبوت الفائزين تلقائيًا في الأول من الشهر 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 🤖✅💸 https://t.me/Crypto_Tethers_Bot 🤖✅💸 https://t.me/Crypto_Tethers_Bot 🤖✅💸 https://t.me/Crypto_Tethers_Bot 🤖✅💸 https://t.me/Crypto_Tethers_Bot
👍3❤2
Signed 45
--- *إلى الإخوة المشتركين:* بما أن المسابقة رمزية، قررنا ما يلي 👇🏼 نظرًا لإمكانياتكم الشعبية البسيطة، وضعنا لكم مهلة لإنهاء المسابقة. هذه المهلة تنتهي يوم *الثلاثاء القادم*. الفائز هو من يحصل على *أكبر عدد من المشاركات*. وكلنا أمنياتنا لكم بالفوز. 🎁 الجوائز: 🥇 المركز الأول: 3 أرقام وهمية + 3000 ريال كاش + 4 جيجا فورجي + باقة مزايا 🥈 المركز الثاني: 2 رقم وهمي + 1500 ريال كاش + 2 جيجا إنترنت + مزايا أسبوعية 🥉 المرك…
❤1
Signed AZIP
📢 🔴 مسابقة التحدي الأكبر برعاية الهائل للمفروشات! 🔴 🏆 اربح جوائز قيمة! 🔹 طريقة المشاركة: 1️⃣ أرسل اسمك وعُمرك والجروب المشارك منه. 2️⃣ اجمع أكبر عدد من الإعجابات على مشاركتك للفوز! 🎁 الجوائز: 🥇 المركز الأول: 3 أرقام وهمية + 3000 ريال كاش + 4 جيجا فورجي + باقة مزايا 🥈 المركز الثاني: 2 رقم وهمي + 1500 ريال كاش + 2 جيجا إنترنت + مزايا أسبوعية 🥉 المركز الثالث: رقم وهمي + 500 ريال كاش + باقة نت أسبوعية + مزايا أسبوعية …
Signed AZIP
الي مافهم المسابقه بتكون هكذا اكثر اسم ياخد عدد اعجابات يفوز فالي يشتي يشارك يرسل اسمه 📨 أرسل مشاركتك عبر: ✅ wa: +967774076863 ✅ te: @abdullahazip
👏1
Signed AZIP
📢 🔴 مسابقة التحدي الأكبر برعاية الهائل للمفروشات! 🔴 🎁 جوائز خرافية بانتظارك – شارك واربح الآن! 🎉 برعاية الهائل للمفروشات، نقدم لكم فرصة ذهبية للفوز بجوائز قيمة! 💰✨ 🔹 آلية المسابقة: شارك الآن واحصل على أكبر عدد من الإعجابات (اللايكات) على مشاركتك، والفائز هو من يجمع أكثر عدد منها! 🏆 الجوائز المقدمة من الهائل للمفروشات: 🥇 المركز الأول: ✅ 3 أرقام وهمية ✅ 3000 ريال كاش ✅ 4 جيجا فورجي ✅ باقة مزايا 🥈 المركز الثاني: ✅ …
Signed AZIP
حصلنا الاجابه عظّمه الله: بأن خلقه وجعله وسيلة للركوب وحمل الأثقال. أنكره وذمه: في قوله تعالى: "إِنَّ أَنكَرَ الْأَصْوَاتِ لَصَوْتُ الْحَمِيرِ" (لقمان: 19).
Signed AZIP
📢 مسابقة رمضان – تحدي الصائمين! 🎁🔥 🔹 السؤال: ❓ ما هو الشيء الذي خلقه الله وعظّمه، ثم أنكره؟ 🎯 طريقة المشاركة: 📩 أرسل إجابتك بهذه الطريقة: 1️⃣ اسمك 2️⃣ عمرك 3️⃣ الجروب المشارك منه 4️⃣ إجابتك 📨 أرسل إجابتك عبر: ✅ WA: +967774076863 ✅ TE: @abdullahazip 🏆 الجائزة: ✅ رقم وهمي للواتساب مجانًا! 🔥 أول إجابة صحيحة تفوز – لا تضيع الفرصة! 🔥
Signed AZIP
لنا لقاء ان شاء الله بمسابقه جديده في القناه عالواتس اب خليكم متابعين هناك ييكون في مسابقه كبيره ومبلغ كبير😉 جوائز توزع لاضحاي المراكز الاول والثاني والثالث اشتركو بالقناه الخاصه بالمسابقات عالواتس اب https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9iTwV7dmeZXWuUOJ3V/127
Signed AZIP
لقينا الحل هو العين
Signed AZIP
بيتم طرح السوال بقناتنا عالواتس اب والفائزه بنختار مم الواتس 3:30 نرسل السوال بعد ما نشوف نهايه التصويت اشتركو بالقناه الخاصه بالمسابقات عالواتس اب https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9iTwV7dmeZXWuUOJ3V/127
Signed AZIP
عشان المصداقيه صوتو هنا والي بيطلع اكثر تصويت نسويه https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9iTwV7dmeZXWuUOJ3V/127
Signed AZIP
اختارو نسوي جائزه رقم وهمي ام باقه نت شهريه ام باقه نت 4 جيجا يمن موبيل فور جي الكل يرسل اختياره ونختار الاكثر اختيارا رسلو لهنا @abdullahazip
Signed AZIP
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bowod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 673,103 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bowod named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“متجر Play” (@bowod), 1,349 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bowod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.