Channel
@botenfejar_bom3
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,145subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002782956238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @botenfejar_bom3 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/botenfejar_bom3 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @robat_enfejar_ais/26616 Jun 2026, 16:53 UTC | @botenfejar_bom3/18 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 16:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @robat_enfejar_ais/26716 Jun 2026, 16:53 UTC | @botenfejar_bom3/19 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 16:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @botenfejar_bom3/23 · this entry18 Jun 2026, 18:59 UTC | @robat_enfejar_ais/27218 Jun 2026, 19:01 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @robat_enfejar_ais/27318 Jun 2026, 19:04 UTC | @botenfejar_bom3/24 · this entry18 Jun 2026, 19:04 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @robat_enfejar_ais/27420 Jun 2026, 18:12 UTC | @botenfejar_bom3/25 · this entry20 Jun 2026, 18:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @robat_enfejar_ais/27521 Jun 2026, 18:34 UTC | @botenfejar_bom3/26 · this entry21 Jun 2026, 18:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @robat_enfejar_ais | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @robat_enfejar_ais (12–3) |
| @botenfejar_bom | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @botenfejar_bom (13–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 23 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 June 2026 to 3 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @botenfejar_bom. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 2,145 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 2,165 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 2,165 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 2,166 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ونوس 100 % جمعه های طلایی بت 212 شروع شد ◀️برای هر واریز خود بصورت دلاری و ریالی بدون محدودیت واریز بونوس 100% دریافت کنید ⏪برداشت اتوماتیک 10 دقیقه الی 3 ساعت واقعی حتی روزهای تعطیل 🔞این فرصت استثنایی رو از دست ندید لینک سایت 212 حتما ثبت نام کنید https://h1.nu/Bet212net ربات ها در سایت بالا میتوانند اجرا شوند📍 کانال های ما: @botenfejar_bom @robat_enfejar_ais @botenfejar_bom3
راند بعدی رو تا خونه سوم رفتم و ۲۵۰ تبدیل به ۸۰۰ شد پوپ خیلی بازی راحتیه فقط باید تمرکز و البته مقدار کمی شانس داشته باشید
ربات انفجار رایگان pinned «آموزش نصب ربات⬇️ https://t.me/botenfejar_bom/876 مرورگر مورد نیاز برای نصب ربات⬇️ https://t.me/botenfejar_bom/825 سایت مورد نیاز برای کارکرد بهتر ربات💲⬇️ https://h1.nu/Bet212net»
آموزش نصب ربات⬇️ https://t.me/botenfejar_bom/876 مرورگر مورد نیاز برای نصب ربات⬇️ https://t.me/botenfejar_bom/825 سایت مورد نیاز برای کارکرد بهتر ربات💲⬇️ https://h1.nu/Bet212net
نسخه سالم مرورگر قدیمی کیوی Kiwi
💩ربات پوپ برای سایت 212 ساخته شد💩 دوستان این ربات رو سعی کنید بیشتر صبح ها استفاده کنید چون صبح ها هم سایت خلوته و هم ربات بهتر تشخیص میده 🫶 تا خونه دوم تشخیص میده و هر ۴ الی ۶ دست یک دست خطا داره مواظب باشید❤️ ❗️از سمت چپ به راست باید بخونید یعنی اگه داد 3|||4 ، باید اول خونه ۴ و راند بعد خونه ۳ رو انتخاب کنید❗️ و طبق همیشه برای بار nام میگم که فقط تو سایت 212 استفاده کنید نه سایت دیگه⭐️ 💩برای دریافت ربات کل…
💣13 ضریب آخر سایت رو hash و md5 اون رو چک میکنه و بر اساس اون ضریب میده هرچقدر بیشتر تو بازی بمونه بیشتر امنتره⭐️ اینه فرق ربات های کانال ما با کانال های دیگه لینک سایت 212 حتما ثبت نام کنید https://h1.nu/Bet212net ربات ها در سایت بالا میتوانند اجرا شوند📍 کانال های ما: @botenfejar_bom @robat_enfejar_ais @botenfejar_bom3
ربات بعدی تحلیلگره💣 ⭐️ببینید دوستان این ربات رو وقتی وارد بازی شدید حداقل ۵ دست بازی نکنید تا ربات تحلیل کنه ضرایب رو و بعد هم فقط طبق ضریب پیشنهادی ربات جلو برید و پشت سر هم بازی نکنید❗️ این ربات ضرایب سایت 212 رو تحلیل میکنه و با هوش مصنوعی کد سایت 212 رو ادغام کد های دیگه کرده پس شاید برای سایت های دیگه هم ضریب بده ولی قابل اطمینان نیست👍 💣برای دریافت ربات کلیک کنید💣 لینک سایت 212 حتما ثبت نام کنید https://h1…
اگر سوالی درباره سایت یا بازی انفجار داشتید پیام بدید👇 @A_BEB1 موفق باشید
💸عکس رو کامل نگاه کنید💸 فقط تو 212 میشه همچین سودی کرد حالا فکر کنید به این ریتم یه ربات هم بزنی😅 لینک سایت 212 حتما ثبت نام کنید https://h1.nu/Bet212net ربات ها در سایت بالا میتوانند اجرا شوند📍 کانال های ما: @botenfejar_bom @robat_enfejar_ais @botenfejar_bom3
و حالا...💣 😎درحال مشاهده قدرتمندترین ربات انفجار تشخیص ضریب هستید🫡 رباتی که طی کدگذاری های پیچیده از طریق شکستن hash در بازی ، ضریب احتمالی را قبل از شروع راند تشخیص میده💣 🧨رباتی که اختصاصی متعلق به شما اعضای کانال انفجاربوم هست 🧬برای دریافت ربات کلیک کنید💣 ❗️تذکر: اکیدا توصیه میشود ربات های کانال رو فقط درسایتی که معرفی میشود تست کنید نه سایت دیگه،چون مطلقا میبازید !! 🔗لینک سایت 212 حتما ثبت نام کنید👇 http…
برای اطمینان از یکی بودن سرور های سایت آیسان و 212... ربات قبلی با موفیقت رو سایت 212 تست شد و نتیجه یک دست خطا و چهار دست تشخیص صحیح✅ البته من همیشه گفتم پشت سر هم بازی نکنید ولی برای اینکه خودم تست کنم باید پشت سر هم بازی میکردم وگرنه همون یک دست خطا رو هم نمیداد دوستان با ربات های ما میتونید روزانه حداقل ۲ میلیون برداشت داشته باشید💸 💣برای دریافت ربات کلیک کنید💣 آموزش نصب ربات سنجاق هست به زودی ویدیو جدید دربا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @botenfejar_bom3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 83,654 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ربات انفجار رایگان” (@botenfejar_bom3), 2,145 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/botenfejar_bom3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.