Its Back On ROKUU!!
👍6❤2🎉2🔥1

Channel
@boomtapes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,523subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001224818034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boomtapes |
| Created | 8 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boomtapes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 2,523 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 2,529 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 2,535 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,536 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 2,536 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
104 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 32.7% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 26.9% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 17.3% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 11.5% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2025 to 17 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Its Back On ROKUU!!
👍6❤2🎉2🔥1
Evil Control Over Everything - Did you know corporate buyouts can bankrupt your childhood memories and your lifeforce itself? There's a disturbing connection between private equity and the demise of beloved brands like Toys R Us. This isn't your typical business downturn; it's a strategy called asset stripping. Imagine a private equity firm swooping in, using borrowed money to buy a company, then transferring the de…
❤4🔥2😱2
Map Camps Come Out of the Wood - Ever feel uneasy about the connections lurking beneath progressive activism? There's a disturbing trend where some groups advocating for acceptance seem to harbor those who push for normalizing dangerous ideologies, such as MAPs or "minor-attracted persons," which many view as a rebranding of pedophilia. This network cleverly cloaks itself in the language of inclusion and diversity, …
❤3🤬1
Dueling Creation Angle Could the spiritual narratives in ancient texts harbor more than myth? Dive into the dual creation stories of Genesis that hint at different divine agencies. The intriguing etymology of 'soul' points to maritime origins, suggesting that our souls might be bound to worldly realms by cosmic contracts. Ever pondered the symbolism of layering in myth with spheres like those discussed in the seven…
🔥3
Illegal Deportation Alarms Could President-ordered deportations really include U.S. citizens? Imagine getting an email stating your parole is terminated and you must leave the U.S. The twist? You are an American citizen, never convicted of a crime. This isn't fiction—a Wisconsin citizen experienced this, and others might be next. Surprisingly, regional “mega-regions” are being formed, possibly ignoring national and…
❤3😁3
Fake Skies Compilation Is It Illegal for NASA to Deceive the Public? 🚀 Officially, yes. NASA is a U.S. government agency, so intentionally deceiving or misinforming the public violates several laws: Federal False Statements Act (18 U.S.C. § 1001): It is illegal for federal agencies or employees to deliberately falsify, conceal, or knowingly deceive with false statements or representations. Freedom of Information …
👍8❤3
The Katy Perry Space Psyop Did you know: NASA even admits several cases where popular content considered real is edited or enhanced: Blue Marble: Not one photo; composites from satellite data stitched over months. Moon Photos: Apollo images adjusted for brightness, contrast, clarity. Mars Rover Pics: Colors digitally enhanced, not natural human-eye views. Space Sounds: Actually electromagnetic signals converted,…
👍2❤1🔥1
🎬 (13m) The American Idol Psyop (Civil War) Anyone allowed to have a voice or that was once on the team is most likely still on the team. Just remember, half their game is telling you what they are doing but in a reverse roundabout way. Trust yourself as you were made by the creator and if you're scared, go to church. — This video is fair use — Please share Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIR76uih-57/?igsh=MWh…
🔥2👍1
🎬 (6m) Former Spy: Ghislaine Was Epstein's Handler!? This Jewish man was a Mossad Agent as he claims and has deep insight into children honey pots and Epstein in particular. He explains that Israel was behind 911, other false flags and the Epstein Child Trafficking Ring. Robert Maxwell was a powerful media mogul and a direct Mossad asset, using his newspapers to steer public opinion for Israeli interests. His daugh…
👍2🔥2❤1
So Where Was the True Origin of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW)? I have a feeling I know... Disclosure Hub Clip Compilation Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DICT1T8PLvk/?igsh=MWVybGRiaG56YTNnNQ==
🔥4👍1
AI is getting out of hand.. Imagine where we will be in 20 years.. Disclosure Hub Clip Compilation Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH7Nor0siy3/?igsh=b2ptNWFhb2Z6anZi
🔥3
🎬 💥 Save The Youth BEFORE WE CANT! - 15m Disclosure Hub Clip Compilation Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHxA0ZGsbVE/?igsh=bjJiZzloanYwY2Zp
🤬5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @boomtapes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 834,632 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Boom Tapes” (@boomtapes), 2,523 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boomtapes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.