Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bondar Studio: Пирсинг и украшения СПб/Питер

Channel

Bondar Studio: Пирсинг и украшения СПб/Питер

@bondarstudio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

749subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562433774
TypeChannel
Username@bondarstudio
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bondarstudio

Growth

749754751.58 August 2026 — 754 subscribers8 August 2026 — 754 subscribers17 August 2026 — 749 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 748–755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:56749-5
8 Aug 2026, 21:03754no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:01754first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 749 subscribers
Avg views / post
257
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held8 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,802
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2652.0%
🙏714.0%
🔥510.0%
48.00%
❤‍🔥36.00%
💯24.00%
🥰24.00%
🏆12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTCviews —

Bondar Studio: Пирсинг и украшения СПб/Питер pinned a photo

5 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC182 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Самая классная фишка, которую можно получить от анодирования украшений🎨 И это, смена цвета вашего любимого изделия, с которым вы не расстаетесь изо дня в день. Если, например, ваше колечко было синим и успело вам надоесть, вы можете его переанодировать в золотой или зелёный (процесс идет в сторону увеличения напряжения). А еще анодирование — это: ✔️Градиенты и узоры: Мастер может сделать украшение с плавным перех

64🙏2

2 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC258 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы уезжаем за знаниями и эксклюзивами! 📅С 13 по 17 августа наши мастера будут отсутствовать в студии. Причина — самое главное событие года в нашей сфере: масштабная конференция по пирсингу РуАПП, которая пройдёт с 14 по 16 августа! 🔥 Зачем мы туда едем? ⤵️ Каждый год наша команда отправляется на РуАПП, и для нас это не просто поездка — это возможность впитать самые свежие знания, перенять передовые техники, изучи

3❤‍🔥3💯2🏆1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC249 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Где кликеры смотрятся наиболее эффектно?🩵💍💎 Первым в этом списке идет, конечно, «королевский» дейс! В самом центре ушка он притягивает все взгляды, особенно если выбрать пышный, фактурный или сияющий кликер. Но кликеры прекрасны своей универсальностью! Они хороши и для других проколов: 😍Конч: кольцо мягко огибает хрящик, создавая эффект акцентного каффа. 😍Септум/Хеликс/Руук: от тонких изящных капель до дерзких ду

5

27 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC330 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ищем моделей на сложные и интересные проколы: бридж, козелок, соски, установка микродермала и другие виды пирсинга💜👁️‍🗨️ Дорогие подписчики, у нас крутая новость для вас! В эту пятницу, 31 июля (в первой половине дня), в нашей студии пройдёт Модельный день. Наш талантливый мастер-стажёр с опытом работы 4 года будет выполнять процедуру под присмотром директора студии, так что безопасность и безупречное качество гар

2

26 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC290 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пирсинг и ретиноиды: совместимый ли тандем?🛑 Если вы принимаете системные ретиноиды от акне, ваш организм находится в режиме глобальной перестройки. Кожа обновляется изнутри, а работа сальных желез практически останавливается. Для лечения кожи это плюс, но для заживления пирсинга — огромный минус. Вот как ретиноиды разрушают ваш заживающий прокол шаг за шагом: ▪️Ткани рвутся, а не прокалываются: из-за сильной сух

7🙏5

26 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC223 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто-нибудь из вас в данный момент принимает ретиноиды?💊

  1. Нет, и не собираюсь82%
  2. Да, начала0%
  3. Да, уже 2 недели0%
  4. Да, уже месяц6%
  5. Планирую начать12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC270 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Секрет стильного пирсинг-проекта — в разнообразии форм🤫⤵️ Если вы хотите обновить свой сет или планируете новый прокол, это поступление — ваш знак от вселенной! К нам приехали премиальные титановые пины и топы от Industrial Strength в самых желанных дизайнах: ➡️Лапки и Бабочки — для тех, кто хочет добавить образу легкой игривости и кокетства. Прекрасно подходят для акцентов в проколах мочки или трагусе. ➡️Цветочк

🔥43🥰2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @bondarstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

Кто-нибудь из вас в данный момент принимает ретиноиды?💊

  1. Нет, и не собираюсь82%
  2. Да, начала0%
  3. Да, уже 2 недели0%
  4. Да, уже месяц6%
  5. Планирую начать12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 375,843 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bondar Studio: Пирсинг и украшения СПб/Питер” (@bondarstudio), 749 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bondarstudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.