Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 翡翠 股票 菠菜 证券全网数据聚合平台 33群

Supergroup

翡翠 股票 菠菜 证券全网数据聚合平台 33群

@bocai33

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

2,380members

+226 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

6 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318465905
TypeSupergroup
Username@bocai33
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/bocai33

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1382,3802,25915 August 2026 — 2,154 members16 August 2026 — 2,153 members18 August 2026 — 2,138 members22 August 2026 — 2,146 members25 August 2026 — 2,164 members28 August 2026 — 2,180 members31 August 2026 — 2,177 members3 September 2026 — 2,200 members8 September 2026 — 2,221 members12 September 2026 — 2,217 members17 September 2026 — 2,250 members18 September 2026 — 2,250 members25 September 2026 — 2,291 members4 October 2026 — 2,361 members10 October 2026 — 2,380 members15 August 202610 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 57 days, net +226. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,102–2,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
10 Oct 2026, 23:012,380+19
4 Oct 2026, 21:222,361+70
25 Sept 2026, 12:172,291+41
18 Sept 2026, 01:242,250no change
17 Sept 2026, 05:012,250+33
12 Sept 2026, 23:422,217-4
8 Sept 2026, 21:422,221+21
3 Sept 2026, 22:012,200+23
31 Aug 2026, 08:042,177-3
28 Aug 2026, 01:082,180+16
25 Aug 2026, 10:372,164+18
22 Aug 2026, 15:442,146+8
18 Aug 2026, 22:592,138-15
16 Aug 2026, 08:262,153-1
15 Aug 2026, 04:332,154first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“翡翠 股票 菠菜 证券全网数据聚合平台 33群” (@bocai33), 2,380 members as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bocai33.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.