#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 少萝/少萝宝宝/磕炮/白虎/ASMR 📢 反差母狗1v1盯射寸止阿黑颜 📢 熟女海角少妇 📢 网红主播精神反差 | 抖音快手自拍 18+ 📢 精选 麻豆 剧情 国产 反差 视频 📢 国产看片小电影 📢 大学生爆操视频AV福利 📢 熟女少妇探花系列 📢 台州选美 📢 宜都红粉汇 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

Channel
bobo直播精彩回放
@bobojingcai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
30,503subscribers
+207 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002574198099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bobojingcai |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bobojingcai |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 30,503 | +28 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 30,475 | +29 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 30,446 | +45 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 30,401 | +26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 30,375 | +27 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 30,348 | +31 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 30,317 | +18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:10 | 30,299 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 30,296 | first reading |
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.6%
- avg views ÷ 30,503 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,380
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.036%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (27 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 215,347 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 528
- Videos
- 260
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4h 42m
- Average length
- 10m 06s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 59.6% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 31.9% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 8.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 葡萄回放 #回放 #直播回放 #葡萄 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十三 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码G8BSUWZt 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
❤1👍1
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 九九回放 #回放 #直播回放 #九九 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十三 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码il84MOoN 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
👍4
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 猫咪回放 #回放 #直播回放 #猫咪 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十三 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码R2J27uCW 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
👍1
订阅僵尸粉过多 正在一键清理僵尸粉 (之前验证过的这次就不用了) 未验证的会被自动踢出频道 👇👇👇点击下方按钮,进行验证
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 歌歌回放 #回放 #直播回放 #歌歌 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十二 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码Add7z3SS 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
订阅僵尸粉过多 正在一键清理僵尸粉 (之前验证过的这次就不用了) 未验证的会被自动踢出频道 👇👇👇点击下方按钮,进行验证
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 饱饱回放 #回放 #直播回放 #饱饱 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十一 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码GS1AS4ek 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 心灵回放 #回放 #直播回放 #心灵 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十一 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码rrSnfNmc 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
❤1
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 猫咪回放 #回放 #直播回放 #猫咪 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十一 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码vXDeQh6C 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
订阅僵尸粉过多 正在一键清理僵尸粉 (之前验证过的这次就不用了) 未验证的会被自动踢出频道 👇👇👇点击下方按钮,进行验证
👍2
直播回放 CCAV 回放 直播回放 茶茶回放 #回放 #直播回放 #茶茶 #娇喘 #自慰 #嫩穴 #美乳 #诱惑 #娇喘 #回放 #bobo直播精彩回放 #美乳 #人妻 #八月十 #诱惑 #女优 机器人防丢码tzCkDBxo 👇👇👇点击评论区查看完整版资源👇👇👇
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @bobojingcai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bobojingcai edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 14 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 662,508 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bobo直播精彩回放” (@bobojingcai), 30,503 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bobojingcai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.