Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BMN Trading

Channel

BMN Trading

@bmntrading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,429subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003643387600
TypeChannel
Username@bmntrading
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bmntrading

Growth

2,4292,4412,4357 August 2026 — 2,441 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,440 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,438 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,429 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,427–2,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:262,429-9
10 Aug 2026, 16:362,438-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:582,440-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:032,441first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.5%
avg views ÷ 2,429 subscribers
Avg views / post
936
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total19,647
Reactions total281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15856.2%
👍8229.2%
🔥3412.1%
👏41.42%
🤣20.712%
🤔10.356%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC243 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

📊 How was your trading week?

  1. 😱 Terrible (-5% or more)25%
  2. 🥶 Bad (-1% to -5%)18%
  3. 🥺Breakeven (0% or close)15%
  4. 👍 Good (+1% to +5%)28%
  5. 🤯 Amazing (+5% or more)15%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC450 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️US NFP RESULTS⚠️ 🇺🇸 Non-Farm Employment Change: 🔴 Actual -23K 🟠 Expected +85K 🟠 Previous +20K 🇺🇸 Unemployment Rate: 🟢 Actual 4.1% 🟠 Expected 4.1% 🟠 Previous 4.1%

8

7 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC565 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Friday · August 07 · Morning Edition US labor market faces critical test today. Markets brace for NFP data. The US Labor Department releases July’s Non-Farm Payrolls report at 12:30 UTC. Analysts surveyed by Reuters expect a cooling to 80k additions, down from June’s print. This data serves as the final major gauge for the Fed’s September rate decision, impacting the dollar’s recent moves. 📊 What to expect on t

6

6 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC795 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥇 XAUUSD Gold has completed a Head & Shoulders pattern on the local timeframe, with the Left Shoulder, Head, and Right Shoulder now clearly formed after the rally lost momentum Price is currently consolidating just above the neckline near 4224-4236, testing this zone as support before any potential move lower ⬇️ If the price breaks and holds below the 4224-4236 neckline zone, confirming the Head & Shoulders breakd

25🔥4👍3🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC853 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✔️Gold ✔️ Target reached

👍211

6 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC859 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Thursday · August 06 · Morning Edition US Labor Market and Gold in Focus Investors are shifting their focus to the US labor market today as Initial Jobless Claims data looms. With no major central bank meetings on the calendar, sentiment remains tied to upcoming economic indicators and potential policy shifts in the fall. Gold prices continue to hover near record highs, supported by ongoing geopolitical uncerta

11👍1

5 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC844 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤑 This is how July went in the VIP group 📈Portfolio Return: +30% 🎯 Win Rate: 60% 💪 One of the strongest months we've had. The market gave us a lot of opportunities and we took them together with our VIPs 👉 You can check the full journal yourself here 👈 ⚠️ Reminder: the private group is still closed, but you can now 👉join the waitlist in our bot. When we open it, spots will be limited and the waitlist goes first

🔥115

5 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC871 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍫 XAUUSD The asset continues to move higher, with each successive high and low forming above the previous ones. Locally, the price remains in a clear uptrend. Gold has also broken above the local symmetrical triangle and is now testing the upper boundary of the broader consolidation range. ⬆️ If the price breaks and holds above the 4200 resistance level, confirming a breakout from the consolidation, the bullish mo

11👍7

5 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC833 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌅 Wednesday · August 05 · Morning Edition Private payrolls and ISM Services data take center stage as traders seek clues for Friday’s NFP. The ISM services sector is expected to show continued expansion with a 54.5 forecast. ADP estimates suggest a modest 68K gain. Strong prints would likely bolster the dollar’s recovery. 📊 What to expect on the charts today 💵 DXY — dollar steady ahead of key US economic data. 🥇 X

👍6

4 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC854 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💸 EURUSD, Daily EURUSD is pressing right into the descending trendline that's been in play since the April high at 1.1850. 🔍 What the chart shows: Price is currently at 1.1527, just bouncing off the FVG zone (1.1400–1.1540) Below — a second uncovered FVG (1420), a key support zone 📊 Scenario: If price fails to break the 1.1540–1.1580 zone and the trendline, I'm looking for a pullback down to the lower FVG at 1.1

15👍5🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC843 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Tuesday · August 04 · Morning Edition Eyes on US JOLTS: Can the labor market stay resilient? Investors shift focus to today’s US JOLTS Job Openings report, seeking clues on the Fed’s rate path. A drop in vacancies would support the case for cooling labor demand and potential rate cuts, while resilient data could boost the dollar. This report is critical for gauging the health of the US economy. 📊 What to expect

👍85

3 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC869 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#USDCAD shows signs of a reversal. The price breaks above the inverted head-and-shoulders pattern and faces the 100-MA. 🎯 Target 1.4090 on a break above the 1.4050. Join our profile on X to get more insights! @bmntrading

👍103🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @bmntrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTCAnonymous Poll80 voters

📊 How was your trading week?

  1. 😱 Terrible (-5% or more)25%
  2. 🥶 Bad (-1% to -5%)18%
  3. 🥺Breakeven (0% or close)15%
  4. 👍 Good (+1% to +5%)28%
  5. 🤯 Amazing (+5% or more)15%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

📊 How did July treat you?

  1. 😭 I lost a lot (-5% and more)29%
  2. 🥲 I lost some (-1% to -5%)22%
  3. 😳 Breakeven (0% or close)15%
  4. 😝I made some (+1% to +5%)18%
  5. 😏 I nailed it (+5% and more)16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 42,771 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BMN Trading” (@bmntrading), 2,429 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bmntrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.