Channel
@blockchaincutiesinfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,910subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001273619821 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockchaincutiesinfo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockchaincutiesinfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 7,910 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 7,905 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 7,908 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 7,912 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 7,921 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 7,933 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 7,937 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 7,938 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 7,938 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
88 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 47.7% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 17.0% | |
| 🎄 | 13 | 14.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 7.95% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2023 to 24 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Happy holidays, Cutieneers! 🎅🤶 We hope you all are able to spend the holiday season with the ones you love. 🥰 Hug your loved ones, cheer together, and let's enter the new year with bright lively energy, ready to make it the best year ever! With love, BCU Team 🎄
🎄13👍6😭2
📢 Attention Cutieneers! There are several impersonators running around again sending DMs to everyone in public chats asking for "a favor" and "quick assets for an hour". 🚨 We will never ask people for funds\assets in DMs nor will we send people message out of the blue to ask for favors or any private information. If you are communicating with @Tehnfy regarding any support issue in DMs please doublecheck who you ar…
👍11🔥1
Happy Easter, Cutieneers! 🐣 Did you find all the eggs hidden by the Easter Bunny? How much did ya get?! 👀 We wish everyone to have a wonderful holiday! 🥰
🥰2
Happy Valentine's Day, Cutieneers! 🥰 We hope you're spending it in great company, making long-lasting memories with that special someone in your life ♥️
❤🔥7👍2
The Mini Event is now Live! 🥳 Happy holidays, Cutieneers and Happy hunting! 🙌
🥰2👍1
Heya, Cutieneers 👋 We hope you had a wonderful time with the ones you love basking in the holiday spirit! 🥳 Here's a little bit of info about the mini-event we walked about a few weeks ago. 👀 👉 https://blockchaincutie.medium.com/d7dc735911b3 The event should drop shortly! 🎁 We hope everyone has a wonderful 2024, and may it be the best one yet! 🥰
👍3🔥1
🎃Happy Oidhche Shamhna Cutieneers 🎃 https://twitter.com/BlockchainCutie/status/1719406408813212061
⚡2👍1
Our friends at Polkastarter are running a special event with Omni Network! And it's heating up! This is a brand new experience on Polkastarter and they've got exciting immediate (and future 👀) rewards up for grabs! 🤩 For More details check out the post👇 https://twitter.com/BlockchainCutie/status/1707029698096546178
🔥3👍1
The $BCUG Month 24 Provision is LIVE 👏 Check out all the details in the article below 👇 https://link.medium.com/C91INMpVGCb
We're participating in a MegaSpace with GAMERSE! 🎉 Join in on the conversation! Don't forget to follow the steps in the tweet to get a chance in a raffle from GAMERSE :) https://twitter.com/BlockchainCutie/status/1689620737017942017 Due some technical diff, they've recreated the Space and it can be found using the following link: https://twitter.com/Gamersenft/status/1689670144375640064 See you there! ❤️
👍1🔥1
Hey, Cutieneers 👋 We hope everyone rested very well over the weekend! 🥰 As promised, we've written a small End-of-Season summary for you guys to check out. Enjoy! Report can be found here 👉 https://blockchaincutie.medium.com/season-9-end-summary-f6f7ff853683 Happy Hunting 🏹
🔥3⚡1
🚨ATTENTION🚨 Dear Cutieneers, it has come to our attention that there is a new scam going around. There are people who made a contract on BNB that wants to look like $BCUG. The scam contract can be found here: https://bscscan.com/token/0xb4b44a246e48566985568f718aee4f61a0320d13 It is not a part of the game's ecosystem, nor is it the team's effort to expand to other chains! Please be mindful online, and if you find…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blockchaincutiesinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 627,390 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blockchain Cuties Universe – News” (@blockchaincutiesinfo), 7,910 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockchaincutiesinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.