Channel
@blacklist_of_reddington
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,090subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001888325387 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blacklist_of_reddington |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 6 July 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blacklist_of_reddington |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 2,090 | +2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 16:22 | 2,088 | +12 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 2,076 | +20 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 2,056 | +24 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 2,032 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 2,035 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 2,042 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 2,051 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 2,054 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 2,056 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 2,059 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 2,061 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 2,064 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 2,063 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 2,063 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 6 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
242 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 151 | 62.4% | |
| 😇 | 19 | 7.85% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 7.02% | |
| 🤓 | 17 | 7.02% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 4.13% | |
| 😈 | 9 | 3.72% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 2.07% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 2.07% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 1.65% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.65% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.413% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2023 to 3 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
How they say it? “Reklama” 😉 🤝
😇19👍14👏9😈8🫡6🤓3
Наши коллеги из BlackList поправили российское вранье запустив правильную видео трансляцию на самом крупном телеканале Татарстана. https://t.me/blacklist_of_reddington/23
👍17👏4🤓2👌1
Video, posted without a caption
👍30👌2
Today we will share a result of a good job of UA-cyberactors and the most popular channel in Tatarstan, Efir. Thanks to the "powerful protection system", residents of Tatarstan could watch Russian anti-propaganda for 2 hours without interruption, truthful information about the slave status of Tatarstan residents, the lost right of the peoples of Russia to self-determination and Moscow's use of small peoples for its a…
👍17👏4🤝4🫡4
File, posted without a caption
👍38🤓3👌2
Today we are going to reveal some data about Rostov city and Rostov govemment. We suppose that after the new Wagners administration left your mood is slightly down these days, but it doesn't mean that you should stop properly maintaining your critical cybersecurity systems, indoor-CCTV, VM systems, document exchange service, etc. We couldn’t help but decided to "optimize" your network by deleting excessive IT-infrast…
👍18🤓9😈1
Today we are going to reveal some info about administration of Glazov. As usual cybersecurity is on a really poor level, so we decided to simply disable it, anyway the software do not have any attention from your “cybersecurity professionals”. Passwords on desktops, simple access to 1C, webmail - flash royal to us :) But the most disappointing is not a stupidity of your admins, but the the calls of your employees to …
👍17🤡5🏆4🗿1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @blacklist_of_reddington. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Black List from Raymond Reddington for HackYourMom” (@blacklist_of_reddington), 2,090 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blacklist_of_reddington.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.