Channel
@bjthb88
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,831subscribers
-271 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002224615814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bjthb88 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bjthb88 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 6,831 | -40 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 6,871 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 6,864 | -79 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 6,943 | -55 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 6,998 | -101 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 7,099 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 7,102 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 7,102 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
坐标 ： #广州95Spa #会所 #口爆 #真毒龙 #69互舔 #全果 #海珠 #琶洲 #万胜围 #新港东 #御姐 #嫩妹 店名：#海珠高端公寓式95会所 地址：琶洲店 @Ym229yp 双向机器人@linsb21bot QQ:1637004657 与你：gzym9958 频道：https://t.me/Yuemny #更多详情请直接联系咨询 备注：自备现金最好哦 ⌚️营业时间 中午12：00—凌晨2：00 1️⃣600 手2️⃣ 2️⃣800全裸👄1️⃣手1️⃣ Ps：主打高质量莞式会所服务。严格把控服务质量，老师定制化服务，情绪价值高。欢迎到店体验。
❤1
😀 #98场 #广州天河 #质量场 荐 #模式选妃 广州天河 # # 首家 海选98(高档型) 特色优点服务：沐浴放松，水中箫，指划，舌尖漫游， 69互动，各种姿势爱爱，丝袜情趣制服，性格温柔开朗，热情奔放，服务周到， 800一次50分钟 1400二次80分钟 不语音，不视频不闲聊，喝酒吃药不接谢谢理解，你若约定不会让你失望，绝不含糊，照片真实，面付，面付。 🪨联系薇：naixi1133 🌐联系扣：3231019359 🚀电报联系: @anw133 🙂优选频道: @gfhncjkchd
#广州增城 #增城 #增城新塘 #新塘 #永和 #95场 #98场 #永宁 #黄埔 #00后 #东莞中堂 项目一：增城永和永宁高端95会所 营业时间：中午2点~凌晨5点 原价（659）预约价（499）口爆一次60分钟 原价（759）预约价（599）口爆两次80分钟 项目二：增城新塘白江公寓 （95后）（400）一次（30分） （95后）（800）两次（60分） 项目三：增城新塘永荟广场永旺公寓 营业时间：下午3点~凌晨2点 大量05后预约可发真人真图 （00-05后）（600）一次（40分） （00-05后）（1100）两次（90分） 项目四：增城新塘汇美（白江）一条龙公寓 （90后）（600）一次（50分） （90后）（1000）两次（80分） 项目五：中高端全套外围上门 没有工作室，配送费先付，车费看位置近远，大概50-100 年龄：16-28岁，学生妹，清纯少女，气质御姐，风韵少妇，无帽嫩妹皆有。 上门范围：主…
❤3
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @bjthb88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,619,682 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“霸王茶姬会所推荐” (@bjthb88), 6,831 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bjthb88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.