Channel
@bjheiche
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,837subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001932521627 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bjheiche |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bjheiche |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 1,837 | -5 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 1,842 | +4 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 1,838 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 1,843 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 1,842 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:04 | 1,840 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 1,841 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,841 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 1 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
86 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 55 | 64.0% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 26.7% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#体验 #妞妞 【验证地点】:大郊亭 【联系方式】:体验领取 【修车水费】:7折体验价 【定金情况】:无定金 【照片相似度】:7.5，p得比较厉害，本人没那么白； 【身材评价】:身高168左右，体重应该不到90斤，很瘦，麻杆似的，前不凸后不翘，多处纹身，尤其两腿最为显著； 【目测年龄】：可能不到20。 【胸器罩杯】：最多A cup。 【我有话说】: 非常差的一次工兵体验，差到我现在回想起来还肝疼： 1.高度疑似代聊，tg上沟通和见面之后说话的态度语气明显不是同一个人。 2.态度非常差差劲。单元门有门禁，妹子下来接的人，进电梯上楼全程冷脸，一眼不看一言不发，到这为止还可以理解，有监控的场合装陌生人，当时还暗赞安全意识真好。等到进了屋关上门，满以为回头就是一个甜笑和拥抱，结果看见的是更加冰冷的面孔，苦大仇深得还以为债主上门了似的，别说客套话了，连一句话都没有，搞得我站也不是坐也不是，然后妹妹去袋里拿了瓶水，还以为是给我的，结果她…
❤3🫡3
楚楚 ，群主这个我昨天去的，还是赶快下架吧，跟她之前频道的不是一个人，简直太垃圾了，花钱碰上这么个玩意，又机车态度又差，跟本人不一致，脸胖，身材差，肚子一圈赘肉 刚进门交完钱就说得快点，待会有事，然后让我自己去洗，我洗完还他妈在抽烟，出来发现很胖，一肚子赘肉，上床之后就随便亲了两下没任何服务，刚做了有五分钟就开始催，然后就说要用手，说我迟到40分钟，事情真相是本来之前说好八点，我说提前十几分我就能到，她说她可能赶不上让我慢点八点20到，我就晚走结果堵车八点35到她那，她楼下接上楼八点40，即使我算八点40到的，也他妈有20分钟，才不到八点50就撵人？之后我强压怒火，好说歹说，搬聊天记录，终于认可8点20开始，让她继续配合，结果差不多刚过五分钟，又开始说要用手，别耽误了她事，态度极其蛮横，搞得我没状态都硬不起来了，想想算了，刚用手搞出来。又开始催着赶紧走，态度还是恶劣，我真火了，一共才十几分钟，颠倒是非，蛮横无理，态度恶劣，真把我…
🫡2❤1
#体验 #妞妞 【验证地点】:大郊亭 【联系方式】:小哥 【修车水费】:11 【定金情况】:无 【照片相似度】:6分 【身材评价】:162左右，45kg左右 【目测年龄】:25 【胸器罩杯】:b 【我有话说】: 第一次这么不想写报告，因为是体验还是简单写两句吧。 拿到体验约时间很顺利，电报聊的也不错，位置是著名小区离地铁站很近。公共出行很方便。 第一次见ls是在门口，见到面全程无交流，因为ls面无表情，全程板着脸。 工作室凌乱，吃完的外卖也没收拾，床上也是乱作一堆。我真的想抽身走，但是这ls又先收费，没办法硬着头皮上吧。 洗澡不py又不满意我自己洗，觉得我个人洗的不感觉，非又给我小弟弟搓两下。 床上就那两下聊胜于无，先是拿干纸巾给小弟弟擦来擦去，然后刚口了两下就干呕了，我尼玛第一次对我自己的卫生产生了怀疑。 那就算了直接戴套上吧，没两下就喊疼，辛苦我也是123门口蹭两下结束算完吧。还好我先观ls下面外表确实没啥问题。最后懒得再…
❤1
本人属于电报新手，25年刚接触电报，一开始就进了北京各种总群，顺着各位水友前辈趟出来的路，沿着非常规范的各种老师榜单和新手指引，从来没有踩过坑。可能一开始吃得太好了，远远低估了人性险恶的程度，导致我最近踩了两个坑，可以说是交学费，体验了两次最典型的电报骗局，应该说是把目前主要的骗钱手段都涵盖了。 前段时间公司出差去了趟四川，不是成都，如果是成都能很好的找到组织，也就无所谓了。后来发现整个四川，除了成都，其余所有城市都是电报禁区。所有城市都是被各类鸡头或者代聊或者中介牢牢把持，这是后话。总之，除了成都，其余地方环境都无比恶劣，我甚至怀疑如果有老师真的个人出来干，早就被这些中介和鸡头举报和赶走了。当然，这是最后才总结出来的。 到了出差地，通过机器人搜了一遍地名，发现有一个大群，就进去了。按照学习群的经验，找了一圈，发现首先没有榜，然后各种老师在群里滴滴，由于没有榜，所以只能想着自己擦亮双眼。一开始试探性的聊了一个内容丰富，每天发日常…
👍55❤18👏2❤🔥1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @bjheiche. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北京黑车榜” (@bjheiche), 1,837 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bjheiche.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.