Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بیت آموز | آموزش طراحی سایت، امنیت، سئو، وردپرس

Channel

بیت آموز | آموزش طراحی سایت، امنیت، سئو، وردپرس

@bitamooz_com

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,208subscribers

+953 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002108995154
TypeChannel
Username@bitamooz_com
Description📚 آموزش کاربردی طراحی سایت | سئو | هک | وردپرس | برنامه نویسی ✔️ پروژه های واقعی، نه تئوری! سایت ما: Https://bitamooz.com درباره ما: https://bitamooz.com/about-us ارتباط با ما: @Bitamooz_support @bitamooz_bot @HTHTM_BOT @Abolfazl_Enayati_org
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bitamooz_com

Growth

7,2558,2087,731.56 August 2026 — 7,255 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,271 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,482 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,638 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,831 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,208 subscribers6 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 18 days, net +953. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,112–8,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 07:158,208+249
20 Aug 2026, 07:367,959+128
17 Aug 2026, 09:287,831+193
13 Aug 2026, 08:537,638+156
9 Aug 2026, 23:347,482+211
6 Aug 2026, 13:407,271+16
6 Aug 2026, 09:187,255first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 8,208 subscribers
Avg views / post
882
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held39 (27 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total34,393
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
128
Videos
2
Links
135

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 39 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9081.8%
🔥1210.9%
😍32.73%
👍21.82%
👏21.82%
💯10.909%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC434 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

✅ یک بکاپ مطمئن حداقل باید این ۳ ویژگی رو داشته باشه: ۱. منظم باشه فاصله بین بکاپ‌ها باید با میزان تغییرات سایت هماهنگ باشه. ۲. خارج از هاست اصلی نگهداری بشه اگر فقط روی همون سرور نسخه پشتیبان داری، با از دست رفتن سرور ممکنه بکاپ رو هم از دست بدی. ۳. قابلیت بازیابی اون تست شده باشه حداقل گاهی روی محیط تست بررسی کن که فایل‌ها و دیتابیس واقعاً برمی‌گردن. 📌 قانون ساده بیت‌آموز: بکاپی که هیچ‌وقت بازیابی‌شدنش رو امتحان ن

2

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

25 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC443 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

💾 بکاپ داری؟ خوبه... ولی مطمئنی قابل بازیابیه؟ بیت‌آموزی‌ها، خیلی از مدیرهای سایت با خیال راحت می‌گن: «نگران نیستم، از سایت بکاپ دارم.» اما یک سؤال مهم‌تر وجود داره 👇 آخرین بار کی مطمئن شدی بکاپت واقعاً قابل Restore شدنه؟ داشتن فایل بکاپ به‌تنهایی کافی نیست. ممکنه: ▫️ فایل ناقص ذخیره شده باشه ▫️ دیتابیس داخل بکاپ نباشه ▫️ نسخه خیلی قدیمی باشه ▫️ فایل خراب شده باشه ▫️ یا اصلاً ندونی موقع بحران چطور باید برش گردونی

1👏1

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

24 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC776 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🔥 یه اشتباه ساده که می‌تونه سرعت سایتت رو نابود کنه! خیلی وقت‌ها مشکل سرعت سایت از هاست یا کدنویسی پیچیده نیست؛ از چندتا تصویر سنگین شروع می‌شه که بدون بهینه‌سازی آپلود شدن. مثلاً فرض کن ۱۰ تصویر داری و هرکدوم حدود ۲ مگابایت حجم دارن. یعنی کاربر برای دیدن اون صفحه ممکنه مجبور بشه نزدیک ۲۰ مگابایت تصویر دانلود کنه! 😐 ✅ قبل از آپلود تصویر این ۳ کار رو انجام بده: 1️⃣ ابعاد تصویر رو متناسب با محل نمایش تنظیم کن. تصویر

3

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

23 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC955 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🔍 قبل از انتخاب کلمه کلیدی، یک سؤال مهم‌تر وجود داره: کاربر دقیقاً دنبال چیه؟ 🤔 فرض کن سه نفر این عبارت‌ها رو در گوگل جست‌وجو می‌کنن: HTML چیست آموزش HTML دوره HTML هر سه درباره HTML هستن؛ اما احتمالاً با یک هدف جست‌وجو نکردن. نفر اول می‌خواد مفهوم HTML رو بفهمه. نفر دوم دنبال یادگیری و آموزش مرحله‌به‌مرحله‌ست. نفر سوم احتمالاً داره یک محصول آموزشی رو بررسی می‌کنه. ‼️ اینجاست که مفهوم Search Intent یا هدف جست‌وجو

2💯1

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

22 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC≈1,500 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

📌 قانون بیت‌آموزی‌ها: وقتی JavaScript کار نمی‌کنه، حدس نزن... مرحله‌به‌مرحله بررسی کن. دیباگ کردن خودش بخشی از برنامه‌نویسیه؛ نه نشونه این‌که بد کد زدی. 👌 این پست رو ذخیره کن؛ دفعه بعد که کدت اجرا نشد، از همین چک‌لیست بالا شروع کن. @Bitamooz_Com

2

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

22 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC≈1,220 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🧯 JavaScript کار نمی‌کنه؟ قبل از هر چیزی این ۷ مورد رو چک کن بیت‌آموزی‌ها، وقتی یک کد JavaScript اجرا نمی‌شه، لازم نیست از همون اول کل کد رو زیرورو کنی. خیلی وقت‌ها مشکل از یکی از همین چند مورد ساده‌ست 👇 🔹 ۱. Selector درسته؟ document.querySelector('.menu-btn') کلاس یا id دقیقاً همون چیزیه که داخل HTML نوشتی؟ 🔹 ۲. خروجی null نیست؟ console.log(element); اگر null دیدی، یعنی عنصر پیدا نشده. 🔹 ۳. اسکریپت زودتر از HTML

3😍1

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

20 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🔥 مهم‌ترین تغییرات WordPress 7.1 📱 طراحی ریسپانسیو داخل Site Editor حالا کنترل بیشتری برای استایل‌دهی در اندازه‌های مختلف صفحه دارید و بخشی از کارهایی که قبلاً به CSS نیاز داشتند، مستقیم از ویرایشگر قابل انجام‌اند. 🖼 ویرایش بهتر تصاویر ابزار Media امکانات بیشتری برای Crop، تغییر نسبت تصویر، Flip، چرخش دقیق و ویرایش اطلاعات فایل در اختیار شما می‌گذاره. 📝 بخش Notes کاربردی‌تر شده یادداشت‌ها دیگه فقط محدود به سطح Blo

2🔥2

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

20 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC944 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🚨 وردپرس 7.1 رسماً منتشر شد؛ چه چیزهایی تغییر کرده؟ بیت‌آموزی‌ها، وردپرس 7.1 در تاریخ ۱۹ آگوست ۲۰۲۶ منتشر شد و این آپدیت فقط مجموعه‌ای از باگ‌فیکس‌ها نیست؛ چند تغییر کاربردی برای طراحی، مدیریت محتوا و عملکرد سایت همراه خودش آورده. 👇 @BitAmooz_com

3

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

19 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC862 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🧠 تفاوت اصلی اینجاست: ▫️ event.target عنصریه که کلیک واقعاً از همون‌جا شروع شده ▫️ event.currentTarget عنصریه که Event Listener روی اون ثبت شده یعنی در مثال بالا، کلیک از span شروع شده؛ اما Listener روی button قرار داره. 📌 قانون ساده امروز اگر می‌خوای بدونی کاربر دقیقاً روی چه عنصری کلیک کرده: event.target اگر می‌خوای به عنصری دسترسی داشته باشی که Listener روی اون ثبت شده: event.currentTarget این تفاوت مخصوصاً وقتی

2

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

19 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC770 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🎯 سوال: event.target و event.currentTarget چه فرقی دارن؟ بیت‌آموزی‌ها، این یکی از اون تفاوت‌هاییه که تا وقتی به Eventها نخوری، شاید اصلاً بهش دقت نکنی. فرض کن این HTML رو داریم: <button class="buy-btn"> <span>خرید محصول</span> </button> و این JavaScript: const button = document.querySelector('.buy-btn'); button.addEventListener('click', function (event) { console.log(event.target); console.log(event.currentT

4

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

17 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC904 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🧠 سوال: "querySelector" دقیقاً چی پیدا می‌کنه؟ وقتی می‌نویسی: const button = document.querySelector('.btn'); ممکنه فکر کنی JavaScript تمام عنصرهایی که کلاس ".btn" دارن رو پیدا می‌کنه. اما نه. 👇 "querySelector()" فقط اولین عنصری رو برمی‌گردونه که با Selector تو مطابقت داشته باشه. مثلاً اگر این HTML رو داشته باشیم: <button class="btn">دکمه اول</button> <button class="btn">دکمه دوم</button> و بنویسیم: const button =

4

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

16 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC977 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🎯 چک‌لیست CSS قبل از تحویل پروژه بیت‌آموزی‌ها، قبل از اینکه بگی «تموم شد!» یک‌بار این موارد رو چک کن 👇 ▫️ صفحه روی موبایل اسکرول افقی نداره؟ ▫️ از box-sizing: border-box استفاده کردی؟ ▫️ فاصله‌های Flex و Grid با gap مدیریت شدن؟ ▫️ عرض‌های ثابت، ریسپانسیو بودن صفحه رو خراب نکردن؟ ▫️ z-indexهای عجیب مثل 99999 بدون دلیل نداری؟ ▫️ استایل‌های تکراری و بلااستفاده پاک شدن؟ ▫️ صفحه رو در چند عرض مختلف تست کردی؟ 📌 یک پروژه

🔥21

Signed ابوالفضل عنایتی | Abolfazl Enayati

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @bitamooz_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 316,450 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بیت آموز | آموزش طراحی سایت، امنیت، سئو، وردپرس” (@bitamooz_com), 8,208 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitamooz_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.