Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Birzhanashim🤡

Channel

Birzhanashim🤡

@birzhanashim1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,037subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706644595
TypeChannel
Username@birzhanashim1
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/birzhanashim1

Growth

12,03712,07412,055.56 August 2026 — 12,074 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,071 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,067 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,065 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,061 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,056 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,054 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,049 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,044 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,037 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,031–12,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 21:1712,037-7
16 Aug 2026, 18:2712,044-5
13 Aug 2026, 23:3412,049-5
12 Aug 2026, 19:1312,054-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:0512,056-5
9 Aug 2026, 22:3112,061-4
8 Aug 2026, 23:0212,065-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:1012,067-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:0212,071-3
6 Aug 2026, 16:0212,074first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,965 reactions across 18 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,03122.7%
🤡2,00922.4%
1,29114.4%
😁5205.80%
💔5065.64%
👍3283.66%
🌭2332.60%
❤‍🔥2262.52%
😍1681.87%
😢1661.85%
🤮1611.80%
😭1461.63%
🫡1291.44%
😱1061.18%
🔥901.00%
🤪901.00%
🗿820.915%
👾790.881%
💩750.837%
🤯720.803%
28 further kinds4575.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,965reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2024 to 9 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2024, 15:26 UTC≈25,100 views334 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Так ребят. Я глянул человеческую многоножку, бивень, свадебную вазу, есть еще какие-нибудь фильмы с сильной драматургией и захватывающим сюжетом ?

🤮161109😁42👍8🤬8💘3🔥3

9 Mar 2024, 07:14 UTC≈26,100 views349 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Я знаю, что тут у меня большинство девушек, и для вас эти слова будут непонятны, но я испытал дикое удовольствие от того, как Джошуа отпиздил Нганну. Всем хорошего дня 😁

😁198🤣7332👍16🔥9🤔9❤‍🔥5🤡5

8 Mar 2024, 05:34 UTC≈26,400 views563 reactionsread 17 August 2026

С Днем Рождения милые дамы ! Валар Моргулис , Авада Кедавра, Каге Буншин Но Джитсу❤️ UPD. Ой с 8 марта Пххахахахаххаха

391🤣118😁12🥰10🔥8🍓5🥴5👍4

7 Mar 2024, 07:28 UTC≈20,800 views187 reactionsread 17 August 2026

У меня в преддверии 8 марта к вам 2 вопроса: 1. Девчонки, какой по вашему подарок является самым кринжовым и хуевым (ответ любой подарок хорош и главное внимание, не принимается ) 2. Пацаны - как вы выходили (выходите) из ситуации, когда бабок нет, а подарок дарить надо ?

🤣13534🔥8❤‍🔥4👍2👾2🍓1👏1

6 Mar 2024, 18:38 UTC≈20,700 views300 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

А это один из тех, кто активничает в чате. Ты блять сколько качался, для такой формы ?😩😩😩😩😩

🤣21731🔥18😁14👍11🍓6🤯2❤‍🔥1

6 Mar 2024, 18:28 UTC≈18,000 views226 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, смотрите че у меня есть😁 Завтра, думаю, сниму на них обзор

😍164👍2519👀9🔥5🍓2👾2

6 Mar 2024, 18:08 UTC≈17,600 views234 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Меллстрой. UPD. Оказывается он стримил не на твиче, а на Кике (впервые слышу о таком сервисе😩)

😁12541🤣34🤯15👍6🤡5❤‍🔥4🍓3

6 Mar 2024, 07:46 UTC≈18,200 views135 reactionsread 17 August 2026

В телеге, я заметил, пиздец угарные стикеры. Скиньте в комментарии ниже свой любимый (только без трупов плз). Мне надо сохранить на случай важных переговоров😁👇🏾

👍83😁2015🍓8🔥3🖕3🤣3

5 Mar 2024, 16:58 UTC≈18,900 views552 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Инста заработала, походу кабеля соединили 😩😩😩 Не забудьте въебать лайк и коммент под мое последнее видео в инсте, я вам не бесплатно здесь площадку для развлечения предоставлял

🤣43655😁29💩12😈8👍6💘6

5 Mar 2024, 15:59 UTC≈20,800 views223 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Не хочу быть пиздаболом, но вот одна из версий от подписчика, хотите верьте, хотите нет. Я помню, кто-то грозился их перерезать, и если теория правда - значит воплотили в жизнь 😩👇🏾 «В Красном море перерезали кабели глобального интернета, - Sky News. Затронуто 25% трафика, проходящего через Красное море по линиям, передающим данные в Африку, Азию и на Ближний Восток.»

🫡118🤣55🤨1613🤡6😢6👨‍💻5👍4

5 Mar 2024, 15:49 UTC≈18,000 views444 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Гляньте тут, че как вам ? 😩

❤‍🔥212🤣170👍2211🔥10💯5👎4😍4

5 Mar 2024, 15:48 UTC≈16,800 views169 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Инста сломалась, потому что я видос выгрузил

88🤣50😁17🤡5👍4😈2😐2😇1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @birzhanashim1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 945,394 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Birzhanashim🤡” (@birzhanashim1), 12,037 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/birzhanashim1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.