Channel
fastege.ru | Биофак Биология ЕГЭ
@biofakege
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,505subscribers
-274 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002134654594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biofakege |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biofakege |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 2,505 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 2,509 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 2,509 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 2,516 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 2,517 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 2,532 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 2,547 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 2,564 | -37 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 2,601 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 2,617 | -32 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 2,649 | -96 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 2,745 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 2,754 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 2,772 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 2,779 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@napolskaya_ege · 41,744
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@marklamarkdays · 69,949
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
@chemist_msu · 88,905
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
@bio_boom · 40,093
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
@biofamily_ege · 85,753
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@biowithbear · 52,595
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
@chemfamily · 27,825
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
@kazanZkaya · 72,110
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@konspekty_ege · 93,211
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
@stopointerschool · 44,063
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
@ege100_rus · 147,769
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fastege.ru | Биофак Биология ЕГЭ” (@biofakege), 2,505 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biofakege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.