Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

БылоЕСТЬбудет

@biloestbudet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,091subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413240007
TypeChannel
Username@biloestbudet
Created1 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/biloestbudet

Growth

2,0912,0952,0936 August 2026 — 2,095 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,095 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,093 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,091 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,090–2,096 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:022,091-2
9 Aug 2026, 04:212,093-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:222,095no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:472,095first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 2,091 subscribers
Avg views / post
369
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held14 (3 March 20264 August 2026)
Views total369
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

591 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27346.2%
👍17028.8%
🔥8514.4%
👏233.89%
🎉213.55%
👎81.35%
🤔61.02%
🤩30.508%
😁20.338%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 591reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC369 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Фактор англосаксов в нашей истории В наше тревожное время непросто разобраться в причинно-следственных связях событий. Тем не менее, присутствие дестабилизирующего англо-саксонского фактора практически ни у кого не вызывает сомнений. Я задался вопросом – а когда и с каких событий началась эта история. И вот что вспомнилось. Практически по всем затронутым сюжетам у меня были посты. Если нужны подробности, загляните.

👍2113🔥7😁2👎1

14 Jun 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,080 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто что хочет США хотят: Ослабить Россию. Но оставить ее в качестве противовеса Европе, чтобы сковывали друг друга Добиться разочарования Китая в партнёрстве с Россией Выдавить Россию с мировых рынков углеводородов Остановить движение России по всем направлениям Европа хочет: Изнурить Россию затяжной войной с Украиной и попользоваться ресурсами ослабевшей России, восстановив свое прежнее величие Произвести как можно

👍3717🔥9👎4🤔1

14 Jun 2026, 16:39 UTC790 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://max.ru/join/Fj002czAvUft6EO6O3VYRXIZSgtcSk3d60Vahggts1A

👍9👎3🔥1🤩1

14 Jun 2026, 11:28 UTC809 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие друзья, я переместился в Max. Название канала такое же. Приглашаю. Но здесь тоже остаюсь, потому что не все жалуют новый мессенджер. Дело личное. Канал продолжится.

25👏9👍6🤔5

4 Jun 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,160 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍2812🔥8

4 Jun 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,090 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​​Друзья, Перерыв в публикации постов явно затянулся. Не по моей вине. Благодарю всех, кто не отписался. Обычно к Дню Победы я размещал материалы, имеющие своей основой рассказы ветеранов или современников тех событий. Иногда это были мои собственные наблюдения. В этот раз именно такой случай. Кстати, сопряженный с последним постом о Туркменском конном полку. Обычно его всадников называли текинцами, и всем все стан

👍3011🔥10

24 May 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,260 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, пока проблема с Телеграммом не получается размещать посты. Но обязательно вернусь. Обещаю.

48👏14

19 Mar 2026, 11:23 UTC823 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Отчаянные, лихие наездники и рубаки» Недавний пост о Дикой дивизии помимо естественного интереса к не-обычной теме выводит нас на проблему, о которой я писал несколько раз: как царской власти удалось поставить на службу России народы, с которыми еще недавно шла ожесточенная война. Их подвиги в Первой мировой войне (потом в Великую Отечественную) бесспорны. Но ведь совсем недавно отцы героев противостояли русской ар

18👍8

19 Mar 2026, 11:23 UTC620 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вскоре появится Туркменская конная милиция из трехсот всадников. Им был вручен штандарт: на желтом полотнище перекрещиваются две красные полосы и в середине надпись черными буквами "ТРК". Походы, переформирования, приграничная разведка и охрана – это все служба России. В лучшие военно-учебные заведения направляли сыновей элиты. Ораз Берды был сыном Дыкма Сердара, руководившего оборо-ной Геок-Тепе. Сын стал командиро

17👍8

19 Mar 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,120 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Известный военный корреспондент Ф. Купчинский в ноябре 1914 г. в "Петроградском курьере" писал: «В громадных папахах и халатах, на ко-торых так странны погоны и кривые дореформенные сабли, они так по-хожи на каких-то древних монголов-воителей, полудикие на вид, строй-ные, темно-смуглые, на стройных, нервных и сухих лошадях, на седлах с круглыми чепраками красного цвета, вышитыми яркими шелками... Их появление всюду п

17👍7

19 Mar 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,760 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В Брусиловском прорыве текинцы опять отличились. В июне 1916 г. один из корреспондентов центральной газеты "Вечернее время" писал: "Дело произошло 28 мая и считается небывалым в военной истории де-лом …Текинцы давно уже на конях. Насторожились люди и кони. Всад-ники втихомолку вытащили свои кривые клычи и пощупали остро отто-ченные столетние клинки. Убедившись, что все в порядке, замерли, страстно ожидая боя. И вдруг

24🔥16👍10

19 Mar 2026, 11:22 UTC745 viewsread 7 August 2026

Уважаемые читатели, Телеграмм работает плохо, если что не так. Сначала текст, потом иллюстрации

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @biloestbudet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 699,311 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БылоЕСТЬбудет” (@biloestbudet), 2,091 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biloestbudet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.