Channel
@big_antropov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,160subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001863232556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @big_antropov |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/big_antropov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 1,160 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 1,159 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 1,158 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 14 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
674 reactions across 10 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 276 | 40.9% | |
| 🔥 | 68 | 10.1% | |
| 🤣 | 66 | 9.79% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 8.61% | |
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 6.68% | |
| 😁 | 45 | 6.68% | |
| ⚡ | 34 | 5.04% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 4.01% | |
| ☃ | 17 | 2.52% | |
| 👨💻 | 13 | 1.93% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 1.04% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 0.593% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.445% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.445% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.297% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.148% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.148% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.148% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.148% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.148% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.148% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 674reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Художник или ценитель? Гид или мастер? Читал сегодня лекцию для лауреатов грантового конкурса "Вклад в поколение" от Т-Банка. Как обычно, вышло немного сумбурно: но по фидбэку придумалось некоторое занятие, может позже выложу. Поделиться хотел снова картинками от нейросети. Последний год мне очень нравится такая аналогия. Увлекаться живописью можно как минимум двумя способами: ходить в картинные галереи или самом…
❤30🔥7👍4🤔1🤣1
18 уток на одну канаву вдоль участка
❤44😍7❤🔥5🤯3🥰1😭1
Когда строгое следование правилам воспринимают как предвзятость В матбоях есть несколько довольно контринтуитивных ситуаций, из-за которых строгое следование правилам легко принять за предвзятость. Проблема в том, что в математике и в матбоях в частности есть принципиальная разница между несколькими вещами: — верное утверждение — очевидное утверждение — доказанное утверждение — принятое оппонентом, жюри или даже са…
👍50❤🔥20❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡34💯27❤15😁3😢2
Нестандартные названия для математических объектов Живу в уверенности, что какая-то эмоциональная подоплёка и названия помогают лучше запоминать олимпиадные идеи. Так, сюжет про sandpile model или chip-firing некоторые подписчики этого канала гораздо лучше помнят под названием «раздача эчпочмаков», а скучную по названию идею «привязать фишку к ребру» — как «надкусить эчпочмак». Для тех, кто не знает. Сюжет такой: …
❤32😁17❤🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣65🔥20❤2❤🔥1
Читал сегодня лекцию на программе повышения квалификации. Говорил о каких-то ошибках в построении работы кружка. Sora нарисовала картинки :) Орфографию нейросети предлагаю простить :) upd. Пояснения: 1. Просто выдать задачи — так себе способ обучения 2. Иногда для занятия нужно что-то уже уметь (сложно заниматься дайвингом без гидрокостюма) 3. Тематика должна соответствовать мероприятиям, в которых участвуют дети (…
❤71🔥39😁24😱1
Итоги года я подводить не буду :) Но у меня есть какого-то рода подарок Мало кто знает, но я стараюсь выкладывать свои занятия на сайте. Он не оперативно обновляется и пока что по нему не очень удобно что-то искать. Это всё в планах на улучшение
❤62☃17❤🔥16👍4🔥2🎄1😁1🆒1
Как вы строите радикальную ось двух окружностей в ГеоГебре? Я сегодня осознал, что если есть окружности c и d, то следующая строчка строит радикальную ось x*(Элемент[Коэффициенты[c],5]-Элемент[Коэффициенты[d],5])+ y*(Элемент[Коэффициенты[c],6]-Элемент[Коэффициенты[d],6])+ (Элемент[Коэффициенты[c],3]-Элемент[Коэффициенты[d],3])=0 Надеялся, конечно, что построит строчка c-d=0. Собственно, именно это и написано выше:…
👨💻13🤨4🙈3❤2
Коллеги, занимающиеся алгеброй, а какой смысл группу чётных перестановок (т.е. знак которых равен 1) называть знакопеременная группа (я понимаю, что Википедия — так себе источник, но в Винберге и Кострикине я не нашёл такое упоминание; но на английском то всё равно alternating group — переменная группа)? Я слегка в шоке и непонимании
❤10
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @big_antropov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 361,400 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Большой муравей” (@big_antropov), 1,160 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/big_antropov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.