Channel
@bfxannouncements
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,454subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001279754341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bfxannouncements |
| Created | 14 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bfxannouncements |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 1,454 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 1,450 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,435 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 1,436 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 1,436 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,606 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
83 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 66.3% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 15.7% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 14.5% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BTC has sat under $68,000 all month. Spot ETFs just posted four straight red sessions into today's Fed decision. Watch the flow data that follows more closely than the rate itself. The key levels that decide the next move. 👇 go.bitfinex.com/AlphaIntel31
❤3
BTC pulled back 4.87% last week as short-term holders sold near breakeven. The cost basis stopped decaying at $68,500. A move above it now needs fresh demand, and the ETF bid has gone. Bitfinex Alpha 215 breaks down what changes the picture. https://go.bitfinex.com/Alpha215
❤3
The largest corporate holder sold $BTC last week and demand answered, breaking a ten-day, $2.73bn ETF outflow streak. With more bitcoin now at a loss than in profit, Bitfinex Alpha asks whether a bottom is forming and what would confirm it 👇 https://blog.bitfinex.com/bitfinex-alpha/bitcoin-corporate-treasury-divestment-sparks-demand/
❤1👍1🔥1
$BTC had its worst June since 2022, falling to $57,803 before reclaiming $60,000. Bitfinex Alpha 212 asks whether ETF demand can return and help confirm the move below $58,000 was a failed breakdown, not another leg lower 👇 https://blog.bitfinex.com/bitfinex-alpha/btc-finds-floor-as-june-selling-fades/
❤1
Two tokenised products can share the same three-letter label and almost nothing else. What you own can differ completely, from the issuer to the claim to how returns are made. Before treating one RWA as comparable to another, look behind the token... https://blog.bitfinex.com/industry-news/tokenised-rwas-access-is-just-the-beginning/
❤1
Interest rate cuts are gone for 2026. The Fed's dot plot erased every cut that had been expected. $BTC ran 13.6% off the lows to $67K, then stalled. The floor is holding for now. https://go.bitfinex.com/BFXAlpha210
❤4
104 trades in a year. Twice a week, every week. Fees paid across all 104? ZERO DCA on Bitfinex. Get exactly what you ordered.
❤5👏1
What is your monthly trading volume costing you in fees? Run the numbers: https://bitfinex.com/zero-fee-trading
❤1
▫️$BTC printed its first sub-$60k level since 2024 ▫️$5.9bn in futures liquidated ▫️$4.3bn drained from ETFs The long positions that drove the cascade have been cleared, and Strategy has re-entered with 1,550 BTC. We look at what comes next ⤵️ https://blog.bitfinex.com/bitfinex-alpha/the-btc-air-gap-closes/
❤2👍1
$BTC hit $65,389 this week, a 21% drawdown and the largest since January 2026. Over $3bn has exited spot ETFs in 10 days. BlackRock's IBIT shed $2.4bn alone. The $72,000 floor is gone. Bitfinex Alpha analyses the breakdown 👇 https://blog.bitfinex.com/bitfinex-alpha/the-floor-that-broke/
❤1👏1
The institutional bid that absorbed every $BTC dip since February has halted. $3bn has flowed out of BTC ETFs in three weeks. Bitfinex Alpha 207 analyses what comes next. https://go.bitfinex.com/BFXAlpha207 https://x.com/bitfinex/status/2061466445578392001?s=20
❤1
Original doesn't just mean first. It means proven under pressure. https://x.com/bitfinex/status/2059949070068678802?s=20
🔥5❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bfxannouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,028,383 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitfinex Announcements” (@bfxannouncements), 1,454 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bfxannouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.