Возбудились?
👍123🌭55❤16🤣15🍌8💋6💊4💯3

Channel
@bezboltenko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
1,758subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001607224016 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bezboltenko |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bezboltenko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 1,758 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 1,756 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 1,755 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 1,752 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 1,751 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 1,747 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 1,748 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 1,748 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,365 reactions across 18 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 303 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 192 | 14.1% | |
| 😭 | 159 | 11.6% | |
| 🤬 | 131 | 9.60% | |
| 😁 | 121 | 8.86% | |
| 🥰 | 103 | 7.55% | |
| 🤯 | 87 | 6.37% | |
| 🌭 | 55 | 4.03% | |
| 🔥 | 48 | 3.52% | |
| 😢 | 45 | 3.30% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 1.17% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 0.806% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 0.733% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 0.659% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 0.659% | |
| 🍌 | 8 | 0.586% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 0.513% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 0.513% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 0.44% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 0.366% | |
| 16 further kinds | 33 | 2.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,365reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2025 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bezboltenko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2025 to 1 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Возбудились?
👍123🌭55❤16🤣15🍌8💋6💊4💯3
Найдена древняя разработка из 2019го youtube.com/watch?v=zQQ1GnjKPeo&feature=youtu.be
❤73👌11😍6🔥3🦄1
Сегодня в 19-35 по Софии (через час) будет стрим на ютубе после полугодовалого перерыва Будет околоразговорный, будут телек, нейрогости и под конец джекбокс.
🤯64🥰20❤10
Лол откуда тут автодубляж взялся https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jke4EAY_2zo
😁62⚡3😱3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g61PHwyLzYo
❤31
Хоть с задержкой, но как обещал - сегодня в 19:00 по Даугавпилсу премьера нового киномэшапа на твиче. https://www.twitch.tv/bezboltenko Шоу Долгоносиков vs Игра в Кальмара (оставил только сцены на самом острове)
❤32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoyyZvcj3TE&feature=youtu.be
❤31😍4🤡2👍1
Сегодня в 20-00 по Таллину (через час) после долгого перерыва будет стрим на ютубе. Будет микс джекбокс+общение+нейрообщение, так как давно не стримил (джекбокс будет в начале) А ещё на этой неделе планируется новый киномэшап уже на твиче, пока спойлерить сурсы не буду, но получится очень экспериментальный.
❤41🤗4🫡4🤡1
Перезалив, нашёл оригинальный файл.
🥰77❤6🔥5💔2🫡1
Хотите прикол века? Видео с ОНЕЖНИТЕЛЕМ удалили из-за нарушений принципов сообщества. (Но тут хоть указали сцену, поэтому в теории можно вернуть, но сам факт, конечно, сильный)
🤬93🤯14😭8💔5❤2🍓1🍾1🎉1
Давайте завтра на ютубе соберемся лучше, даже если найдем альтернативу для такого формата.
👍40🫡4
Увы, обосрамс вышел( Хорошо, что заранее не объявлял хоть, а то б совсем неудобно было. 5 раз подряд стрим отрубали (это не с моей стороны явно), просто EBU уже совсем в край, спасибо, хоть без бана канала. Кто-то знает платформу (кроме ВК), где за копирайт не трогают? Если найдем нормальную альтернативу, то хоть завтра в записи тогда первый пф посмотрим, чтоб компенсировать. (И настрою всё получше)
😢42💩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bezboltenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bezboltenko LTD” (@bezboltenko), 1,758 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bezboltenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.