China Whales 🐋🇨🇳📈 pinned a video

Channel
China Whales 🐋🇨🇳📈
@bestchinesegems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,085subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001408991566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bestchinesegems |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bestchinesegems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 16,085 | +984 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 15,101 | -223 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 15,324 | -100 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 15,424 | -93 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 15,517 | -63 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 15,580 | -137 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 15,717 | -103 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 15,820 | -75 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 15,895 | -149 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 16,044 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 16,044 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 60.7%
- avg views ÷ 16,085 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,760
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (6 May 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🚨 项目聚焦:NEXAPUMP ($NXP) 🚀 NEXAPUMP 正在 Solana 上打造一个与众不同的生态——专为 Memecoin 打造的社交层(Social Layer),在这里,代币的发行只是开始。 🚀 发行代币 → Pump.fun 创作者可以通过 NEXAPUMP 直接发行代币,并上线 Pump.fun。 🏠 即时代币社交中心 每个项目上线后,都可以立即拥有自己的社区空间,从第一天开始连接代币、创作者和社区。 ⚔️ Meme Wars 创建 Meme、参与竞争、投票,并不断提升社区热度。 🎙️ NEXA LIVE 为创作者和社区提供实时交流平台。 🌎 AI 实时翻译 打破语言障碍,让全球加密社区能够无障碍交流。 📊 实时代币动态 将社交互动与链上活动整合在同一个平台。 👥 社区 + 项目发现 无需离开生态,即可发现项目、创作者、用户以及最新上线的代币。 而且这一切已经在实际运行中——NEXAPU…
BSC #10u战神,four配合bn发布10u战神挑战活动,起飞的确实flap,尴尬,后续其他账号回复可能会有另外一波叙事 0xd1d9da3a290fa80fdc50e872cae2e70935117777
BSC 🟡🟢🔥 Printed 25x on our private! $ElonCoin ,good 25x, fly, 25x 给出! 0x499c573997a1382f4051ece45b3d6b2f0e317777
🚨 $249K 市值……市场是不是低估了 $KOKOP? 🐨 大多数人只会在K线一路上涨时买入,而真正的长期投资者,往往会在市场热度退去后开始认真研究项目。 Kokopi Koalas 已经经历了最大的回调,但团队并没有停下脚步。 相反,他们仍在持续推出产品、完善 NFT 生态,并不断拓展品牌合作。 ✅ 100% 公平发行(Fair Launch) 🔒 2500 万枚 $KOKOP 已锁仓 🔥 永久关闭增发权限(固定总供应) 🎨 2,222 枚 NFT 全部售罄 🛍️ Silk & Seam Trait Store 已正式上线 🤼 与 Chris Jericho 达成合作 这正是许多长期投资者开始关注项目的时候。 不是因为成功已经确定,而是因为当市场情绪降温后,项目的风险/回报比(Risk/Reward) 往往会变得更加值得关注。 当然,$KOKOP 依然属于 Solana 上的小市值项目(Micro Cap),价格波…
👀 什么样的项目,才能真正脱颖而出,而不仅仅是一枚普通代币? 对于许多长期投资者来说,答案很简单:透明度。 🔍 🐨 Kokopi Koalas 的 $KOKOP 采用 100% Fair Launch(公平发行) 模式,没有任何团队预留代币(Team Allocation),从源头杜绝了团队提前囤币、砸盘套现的风险,让每位参与者都站在同一起跑线上。🤝 📌 CA: ENcwYGVhRsEqKpH4SzRH4mcYSGc9Cb6s4WJGS9ojpump 💳 创始人钱包目前仅持有约 2% 的代币供应量,同时 Mint Authority(增发权限)已永久关闭,意味着 $KOKOP 永远不会再增发新币,总供应量完全固定。🔒 ⏳ 为了进一步展现长期发展的决心,团队还将 2500 万枚 $KOKOP 锁仓至 Streamflow,锁定期限长达 1 年。 💯 这些并不是空口承诺,而是链上可公开验证的数据。 项目目前已经取得了多…
🚨 大多数 Solana 项目都是高开低走,热度一过就销声匿迹。 这种情况你一定见过:代币上线后,KOL 疯狂宣传、价格快速拉升,早期持有者获利离场,短短几周后,社区成员却只能被套牢。 Kokopi Koalas 🐨💎 正在走一条完全不同的道路。 与其追逐短期炒作,Kokopi 更专注于打造一个能够在上线后持续成长的生态系统。 越来越多长期投资者关注 Kokopi,其中一个重要原因就是它的发行方式: ✅ 在 Pump.fun 100% 公平发行(Fair Launch) ✅ 团队零预留代币(No Team Allocation) ✅ 没有内幕钱包(No Insider Wallets) ✅ Mint Authority 已永久放弃(Revoked) ✅ 永久固定总供应量(Fixed Supply) 项目上线仅 10 天,团队便将 2,500 万枚 $KOKOP(占总供应量 2.5%) 锁仓至 Streamflow,锁…
🏏 SIXR 私募轮已在 AlphaMind 正式开启! 全球拥有 25 亿+ 板球粉丝。 SIXR 正在构建一个链上生态系统,将全球板球爱好者带入链游、赛事预测、数字藏品(NFT)和粉丝共创经济。 ⚡ 287K+ PowerPlay 用户 🎯 240 万+ 已完成互动任务 👥 791K+ 社区成员 ⭐ 来自 13 个国家 的 30+ 位板球明星 📣 球星累计覆盖 2.3 亿+ 粉丝 🌐 接入 Bongo 超 3.77 亿 媒体网络 AlphaMind 私募轮详情: 📊 $SIXR 售价:0.04 美元/枚 📊 本轮 FDV:4,000 万美元 📊 较计划上市价格 0.08 美元优惠 50% 🏏 属于 SIXR 的精彩篇章已经开启! 👉 立即抢占您的认购额度: https://app.alphamind.co/ido/6a1c20249436f7876e97dc81 ⚠️ 参与投资存在风险,请务必做好自己的研究(DY
China Whales 🐋🇨🇳📈 pinned a photo
🚀🔥 XRP 超级周期已经开启! 🔥🚀 🌊 $XRPS 正在加密社区掀起巨大浪潮,并吸引着全球 XRP 支持者的关注! 📈 Dex 热榜排名 第2!已覆盖所有主流 DEX,并已收录于 Binance、Coinbase、Bitget、OKX、Gate、KuCoin 等平台。 🧠 由 @yhbryankimiq 创建,世界最高 IQ(276)纪录保持者,并获得 世界记忆锦标赛(World Memory Championships) 官方认证。⚡ 📍 合约地址: 7XLu71Wvq7zuNU7TP5qjYY8kqg9zxtrsb7sJEEF6pump 💎 为什么社区都在关注 $XRPS? 🚀 社区规模快速增长 🔥 在加密圈持续获得更多曝光 🌊 强大的 XRP 叙事加持 💰 早期布局机会 📈 市场热度与动能持续攀升,每天都在增强!
China Whales 🐋🇨🇳📈 pinned a photo
🚀 BENXCHAIN($DC)—— Web3 财富增长的新机遇 正在寻找一个专注于长期可持续发展、质押收益、NFT 实用价值以及社区驱动增长的项目吗? 🌟 BENXCHAIN($DC) 是一个基于 Solana 生态构建的创新项目,通过质押奖励、NFT 增益、推荐激励以及社区治理,为持有者打造多元化的收益模式。 为什么越来越多投资者关注 $DC? ✅ 基于高速、低手续费的 Solana 网络 ✅ 质押年化收益率(APY)最高可达 35% ✅ NFT 可提升质押收益,创造更多价值 ✅ 推荐奖励机制,最高可获得 5% 奖励 ✅ 社区治理参与权,共同推动生态发展 ✅ 专注于透明度、长期激励与生态建设 💎 生态亮点 🔹 质押奖励 • 30 天锁仓:10% APY • 90 天锁仓:20% APY • 180 天锁仓:35% APY 🔹 NFT 赋能 • Silver NFT:提升质押收益率 • Gold NFT:更高 A…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @bestchinesegems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 345,457 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“China Whales 🐋🇨🇳📈” (@bestchinesegems), 16,085 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bestchinesegems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.