6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,591–2,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 17:16
2,713
+3
14 Aug 2026, 14:06
2,710
+16
11 Aug 2026, 08:23
2,694
+78
8 Aug 2026, 14:51
2,616
+9
7 Aug 2026, 18:47
2,607
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:29
2,607
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 2,713 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.939%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (13 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
5,322
Reactions total
50
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
212 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
74
34.9%
🔥
56
26.4%
👍
55
25.9%
🙏
17
8.02%
👌
10
4.72%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beliy_import. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Импорт Apple станет дороже. С 10 августа меняются правила сертификации.
С 10 августа вступают в силу изменения, которые затронут практически всех импортёров электроники. В первую очередь — подтверждение соответствия продукции.
——————————
Что изменится для импортёров Apple?
Для устройств, на которые оформляется декларация о соответствии (прежде всего iPhone), глобально ничего не меняется. Как и раньше, декларация …
За последний год, как и предполагалось, игроки с рынка продажи смартфонов активно уходят в другие — зачастую смежные — направления.
Потребительский спрос падает. Маркетплейсы через кросс-бординг забирают огромную долю рынка у ритейла — магазины не имеют должной выручки. Плюс постоянные конфискации товара на внутренних рейсах делают этот бизнес для многих нецелесообразным.
Уйдут ещё многие. Спрос продолжает падать, …
Офлайн или опт? Сколько можно зарабатывать на небольшом опте?
Раньше было время ритейла. Те, кто имел десятки офлайн-магазинов в проходных местах, были на коне.
Сейчас рынок изменился.
На мой взгляд, сегодня оптимальная модель — один город, один сильный магазин в хорошей локации, удобной для покупателей. Далее этот магазин усиливается:
• трафиком со всех рекламных каналов;
• отделом обработки заявок;
• сильными пр…
📱 Смартфоны «нон грата»?
Компания Apple объявила о приостановке официальных продаж и поставок своей продукции в Россию еще в марте 2022 года.
Последней линейкой, которая официально поставлялась в Россию, стала iPhone 13. Продажи стартовали 24 сентября 2021 года, а производство завершилось в сентябре 2022 года.
Линейки iPhone 14, 15, 16 и 17 официально в Россию с согласия Apple не поставлялись. Соответственно, комп…
Самая большая нерегулированная чёрная зона на маркетплейсах WB и Яндекс
На российских маркетплейсах по классике два типа продавцов — из РФ и из-за рубежа. И у каждого типа есть своя тёмная сторона.
——————————
🇷🇺 Российские селлеры
Белые — официально завезённый товар, все документы в порядке. Все налоги в полном обьеме, пошлины все очень благородно. Таких меньшинство.
Альтернативные — товар завезён в контрабанду,…
Как промаркировать остатки айфонов в системе Честный знак?
Разберём ситуацию по двум видам товара — потому что многие думают, что процедура одна и та же. Это не так, и разница принципиальная.
— — —
Вид 1: Товар ввезён легально до 1 мая 2026 года
Если у вас есть УПД с прописанным номером ДТ, и этот номер реальный — процедура простая. Заходите в систему Честный знак, следуете инструкции, получаете КИЗы и маркируете…
Первые 3 шага к закупке электроники из-за рубежа
Большинство начинают не с того. Пишут поставщикам если они у них есть, как правило через знакомых пару контактов найти можно, спрашивают цены, получают "назовите объём" — и заходят в тупик. Потому что не понимают базовых вещей.
Вот с чего реально надо начинать:
— — —
Шаг 1: Узнайте, по каким ценам работает рынок
Поставщики в DAFZA не публикуют цены открыто. Только…
Авито, Яндекс Карты, 2GIS: налоговая нашла, где вы прятали продажи
Годами продавали дёшево, чтобы обойти систему. Теперь система пришла за своим.
Схема простая. Берётся ваш профиль на Авито или карточка на Яндекс Картах. Считаются отзывы. Налоговая делает расчёт — столько-то продаж, столько-то выручки. Дальше официальный запрос в Авито: предоставьте данные по этому профилю. Авито предоставляет.
Юрлицо или ИП — све…
Бедные продавцы Apple: покупатели научились их нагибать на ровном месте
Продавец просто не дал чек. Мелочь, казалось бы. А дальше начинается ад.
Покупатель достаёт телефон прямо у кассы, открывает "Проверку чеков" — приложение ФНС. И говорит спокойно: либо чек, либо жалоба прямо сейчас.
Магазин в этот момент быстро вспоминает матчасть: неприменение ККТ — это ч. 2 ст. 14.5 КоАП РФ. Штраф для юрлица — от 75% до 100%…
Пока вы думаете — что будет, как будет, стоит ли — кто-то уже сделал.
Ростов. Пенза. Москва. Калининград. Минск.
В каждом из этих городов уже есть те, кто просто не думает о белом импорте — строит инфраструктуру:
— Изучил Честный знак и разрешительную документацию
— Открыл организацию по НДС 22%
— Разобрал таможенную процедуру от А до Я
— Собрал команду под каждый этап поставки
И всё это — не за месяц.
Постро…
👍4❤2👌2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @beliy_import. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 606,863 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Старинин | Белый импорт” (@beliy_import), 2,713 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beliy_import.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.