Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -793. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,137–12,168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 17:40
11,256
-32
15 Sept 2026, 15:57
11,288
-19
14 Sept 2026, 03:15
11,307
-19
12 Sept 2026, 13:01
11,326
-36
10 Sept 2026, 08:56
11,362
-108
7 Sept 2026, 00:59
11,470
-143
4 Sept 2026, 10:38
11,613
-12
3 Sept 2026, 01:28
11,625
-34
1 Sept 2026, 20:16
11,659
-15
31 Aug 2026, 22:18
11,674
-20
30 Aug 2026, 22:34
11,694
-28
29 Aug 2026, 22:58
11,722
-10
28 Aug 2026, 22:18
11,732
-21
27 Aug 2026, 18:54
11,753
-20
26 Aug 2026, 15:29
11,773
-21
25 Aug 2026, 18:27
11,794
-22
24 Aug 2026, 15:27
11,816
-32
22 Aug 2026, 20:29
11,848
-26
21 Aug 2026, 09:35
11,874
-13
20 Aug 2026, 06:23
11,887
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
738 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5238127004506690054
459
62.2%
custom 5235746965559484186
81
11.0%
custom 5235979782851694640
52
7.05%
custom 5235989656981508154
45
6.10%
custom 5237691778290714057
39
5.28%
custom 5235465254359567392
27
3.66%
custom 5235636511885528898
26
3.52%
custom 5235663617424134977
9
1.22%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 738 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @belbet_fest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ноги давно не гудят, а вот флешбэки до сих пор греют душу. Помнишь, как мы тусили на belbet fest? 🪩
Расскажи о своих впечатлениях в опросе по ссылке 👈🏻
Сделаем belbet fest 2027 ещё лучше вместе! 💜
📸 Фотоотчёт с belbet fest готов. Спойлер: ты там просто космос! 💜
План действий на сегодня простой:
🕊️ Найти себя и друзей.
🕊️ Оценить масштаб своего веселья.
🕊️ Забрать лучшие кадры в соцсети.
И пусть все подписчики тебе завидуют! 😂
Осторожно, это видео заряжено на мгновенный выброс эндорфинов! 🎆
Мы упаковали всю безумную атмосферу, любимые треки, зажигательные танцы и ваши невероятные улыбки в один ролик. 📹
Спасибо каждому, кто разделил с нами это грандиозное событие, ведь belbet fest — это в первую очередь вы и ваша любовь. 💜
P.S.: нашёл себя на видео? Отмечайся в комментариях! 👇
SERYABKINA устроила на сцене belbet fest настоящий пожар! 😲
Нереальная энергетика взрывала танцпол, а любимые хиты в один голос пел весь стадион. 🎤
Скорее включай видео, смотри лучшие моменты её выступления и делись своими впечатлениями в комментариях. ⬇️
💔 Потерял что-то на belbet fest? Мы постараемся помочь это вернуть! 🔍
Если ты обнаружил пропажу банковской карточки, ключей или любой другой дорогой твоему сердцу вещи во время фестивального отрыва — не расстраивайся. Напиши в нашу службу поддержки [email protected]. 💌
Постарайся максимально подробно описать пропажу, а мы проверим, находится ли она у нас. 😁
Пусть твоя вещь поскорее найдётся! 💜
😲 belbet fest пролетел, но обещал остаться… в твоём смартфоне! 📱
Пока ты судорожно чистишь память, чтобы обновить приложения, мы ждём контент! Давай устроим самый масштабный фотообмен года прямо здесь. 📸
Отмечай нас в соцсетях с хэштегом #belbetfest и кидай в комментарии свои самые живые, эпичные или даже слегка смазанные кадры с фестиваля. 😀
Посмотрим, кто оторвался круче всех! 😂🎤
Ну как ты там? 😎
До сих пор накрывают флешбэки с belbet fest, ноги просятся обратно на танцпол, а лицо сводит от улыбки? 😀
Давай ещё раз проживём эти эмоции. Голосуй в опросах ниже, а мы соберём твой фидбэк и зарядим следующий фест на полную мощность. 🎆⭐️
Фестиваль закончился. Ноги гудят, уши заложены, а на душе почему-то легко.
Но если вечер хочется продолжить не с кем-то случайным, а с тем, кто реально в твоем вкусе, — ты знаешь, где искать.
SENS не закрывается даже после последнего аккорда.
Хорошего вечера. И удачи там,
SENS 💜
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @belbet_fest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 15 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“belbet fest | 2026” (@belbet_fest), 11,256 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belbet_fest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.