Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 北京外围 北京上门

Channel

北京外围 北京上门

@beijingw1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,431subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001609518943
TypeChannel
Username@beijingw1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/beijingw1

Growth

5,4315,4915,4617 August 2026 — 5,491 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,490 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,476 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,471 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,462 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,450 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,441 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,431 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,422–5,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 01:375,431-10
24 Aug 2026, 09:185,441-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:435,450-12
17 Aug 2026, 16:385,462-9
14 Aug 2026, 02:055,471-5
11 Aug 2026, 00:245,476-14
8 Aug 2026, 03:205,490-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:465,491first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 19 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2024 to 26 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Nov 2025, 13:25 UTC607 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🏅在其他包养平台入会过的或者安排过的,凭聊天记录截图和付款截图可以在我们这里免费入会! 👏现在入会首单8折 🌏 地区频道导航 客服 @baoyang51bot

5 Jul 2025, 04:22 UTC975 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

包养平台新交流群 https://t.me/+BoukV0CxLvM2OTc0

19 Dec 2024, 09:32 UTC≈2,090 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Beijing 司藤小姐🏠朝阳 硬5 金涵 真人平面模特 高173 D 99年 • 肤白如雪 S型前凸后翘 细长美腿 • 皮肤紧致 嫩滑 沙漏型身材 • 高素质 女友feel上得厅堂 下得厨房 #硬5 #好评

1

19 Dec 2024, 09:32 UTC≈1,320 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

北京司藤小姐🏠硬5 𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙨 ₩ • 细腰 无任何风尘味 人民日报实习生 Gentle clean and fresh natural gentle and graceful high sense of love at first sight first love is a short-term part-time 温柔 乾淨 清新自然、溫柔優雅 落落大方高級感十足、一見鍾情 短期兼職最美首映46kg 175D 零二年女生敏感體質條件俱佳 證實資料 見後便見分曉

2

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @beijingw1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,391,417 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“北京外围 北京上门” (@beijingw1), 5,431 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beijingw1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.