Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 美美的宝贝们

Channel

美美的宝贝们

@beibeia022

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

772subscribers

+347 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003612405986
TypeChannel
Username@beibeia022
Created28 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/beibeia022

Growth

425772598.523 Aug 2026, 03:45 — 425 subscribers24 Aug 2026, 08:18 — 772 subscribers23 Aug 2026, 03:4524 Aug 2026, 08:18
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +347. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 373–824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 08:18772+347
23 Aug 2026, 03:45425first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.3%
avg views ÷ 772 subscribers
Avg views / post
388
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.229%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held10 (28 March 202623 August 2026)
Views total2,717
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC182 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🎰 贤时局白嫖抽奖第二十波 📮 参与条件: 🎫 加入-软绵绵频道 🎫 加入-言言的频道💗 🎫 加入-美美的宝贝们 🎫 加入-重庆贤者时间规划局 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 1 条 🎫 加入-丫丫的小🏘️ 🎫 加入-雾都逼友の谈 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 丫丫1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 柳夏美1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 言言1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 软绵绵1P白嫖劵 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 贤时局白嫖抽奖第二十波 总计77个自营老师已参与,感谢支持 1.老师生理期不同,中奖后在3个开课日兑奖;过期不侯,不得买卖、转让! 2.退出频道、炸号,不予兑换。 3.中奖后凭获奖信息自行联系老师兑奖,要求反馈评价,以报告或锐评形式给出。 4.如遇兑奖过期、炸号等状况,经老师确认后,老师的白嫖劵流入群内活跃度抽奖,按相应规定即时抽出。 言言 @Piki698 丫丫 @syayaa01 软绵绵 @rmm9968 柳夏美 @meimeia

1

22 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC261 viewsread 23 August 2026

🔥封神榜出击报告: 老师花名:柳夏美,验车留名:Ast 老师联系方式:@meimeia111 颜值:9分,身材:9分 服务:9分,态度:9分 重庆封神榜:https://t.me/FSB666Bot?start=join_tpTx9HvBe3hlODlh 详细体验:八月的第二个工兵柳美夏老师,因为下周要出差,所以果断就约了。 🅐初见而知风貌:身高165+,体重90+,🐻C-圆润饱满,真假不清楚,皮肤白皙滑嫩,可以和我媲美,年龄26,可能因为抽烟,声线较粗,本人很漂亮,较照片飒爽一些,一袭黑色短纱裙露出两条圆润笔直的腿。 🅑细品方见性情:第一天开准备不足,老师外卖水和纸,我们边等边聊天,老师先从后面抱着我撒娇,而后又顺势躺我腿上,边揉捏酥胸边聊天,聊了接近半个小时直到外卖送到,才进行下一步,女友感拉满。 🅒细论可察风情:有陪洗,当然不要求可能没有,b面按肩背、全身过水,ab面👅滑、🐻滑,就不细说了,再说说日感吧,水多,应该很敏感,

22 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC281 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

听取接纳哥哥们的意见,价格调整p6 pp11。喜欢服务好的哥哥可以找我呦

22 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC293 viewsread 23 August 2026

💯 车评系统 | 评价模版 当前模版 【时间】:2026-08-22 【老师】:柳夏美 @meimeia111 【留名】:闪电侠 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9.5 【态度】:9.5 【环境】:9 【报告出处】:重庆封神榜:https://t.me/fsbbyq666 【过程】:昨晚有幸抽到新老师柳夏美的工兵,今早就约了柳老师的头课,看了老师的频道,肤白貌美服务型御姐,正好符合我的偏好,甚是期待。按时到达,进门就见一高挑御姐站在门后,身材确实不错,皮肤看起白皙细腻,长相略带点风骚,确实有日像,聊了聊感觉老师性格很开朗,态度也好,老师江苏人,之前在高端会所做过,后面上岸自己做生意,今天才第一天在重庆开课,这种老师一般服务都很好,后面发现确实如此。共浴后上床开始服务,b面按摩指划漫游都做的不错,可惜屋里没有杯子,没做上毒龙,要做毒龙的建议带个杯子去。a面吹箫也很舒服,无齿感,时间也长,感觉到了老师主动女上,

22 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC372 viewsread 23 August 2026
Video

新人开课,服务型大长腿!人照一致,欢迎宝宝🍼们过来体验💋

20 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTCviews —

美美的宝贝们 pinned «🌸 艺名:柳夏美 本人比视频好看 👗年龄: 00 👠身高:168 👛体重: 46KG 👙胸围: 36C真🐻 ☔️介绍:🌱性格开朗。 肤白貌美 上粉下嫩 私处紧密☃️敏感型易高潮高度配合💦 上课内容:🐍蛇纹 69互舔:陪🛀🏻:口爆: 亲咪咪:调情:丝袜:情趣:制服诱惑: 配合各种姿势不过分的要求都🉑满足。服务控 自带课室 小区房:进出方便 好停车🅿️ 课费: 一次p600 (45分钟) 二次pp1100 (90分钟) 外出pp起哦 先付来回车费 🈲无套拔套 三通 嗑药 暴力 辱骂无素质 打桩机勿扰…»

20 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC638 viewsread 23 August 2026

🌸 艺名:柳夏美 本人比视频好看 👗年龄: 00 👠身高:168 👛体重: 46KG 👙胸围: 36C真🐻 ☔️介绍:🌱性格开朗。 肤白貌美 上粉下嫩 私处紧密☃️敏感型易高潮高度配合💦 上课内容:🐍蛇纹 69互舔:陪🛀🏻:口爆: 亲咪咪:调情:丝袜:情趣:制服诱惑: 配合各种姿势不过分的要求都🉑满足。服务控 自带课室 小区房:进出方便 好停车🅿️ 课费: 一次p600 (45分钟) 二次pp1100 (90分钟) 外出pp起哦 先付来回车费 🈲无套拔套 三通 嗑药 暴力 辱骂无素质 打桩机勿扰 私聊:@meimeia111 双向机器人🤖:@xiaxuea1BOT

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @beibeia022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,600,911 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“美美的宝贝们” (@beibeia022), 772 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beibeia022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.