Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BehindTheMatrix

@behindthematrix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,522subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185320885
TypeChannel
Username@behindthematrix
Created21 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/behindthematrix

Growth

2,5222,5252,523.56 August 2026 — 2,525 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,525 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,522–2,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:092,522-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:162,525no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:512,525first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 06m
Average length
3m 43s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7120.8%
🤡4814.1%
🤣4613.5%
😁4412.9%
349.97%
💯267.62%
🙈133.81%
🤮133.81%
👌92.64%
👏92.64%
🥰82.35%
🔥41.17%
😈30.88%
🎉20.587%
🏆20.587%
🙏20.587%
🤓20.587%
👎10.293%
👻10.293%
💊10.293%
2 further kinds20.587%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2025, 04:37 UTC≈2,500 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Papst Leo segnet einen Eisblock wegen des Klimawandels 🤷‍♂️

🤡19🙈12😁91🔥1

24 Sept 2025, 15:43 UTC≈2,600 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Tempolimit für saubere Luft - Auch E-Autos sind betroffen 🤷‍♂️ (CHIP)

🤡16😁10👍1

21 Sept 2025, 16:04 UTC≈2,470 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Das Vorbild für unsere Regierung. Der intelligenteste Mensch der Welt (Idiocracy - 2006)

😁14💯5😭1

21 Sept 2025, 08:29 UTC≈5,820 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Kontroverse um Trauerpost für ermordeten Charlie Kirk (Nikolai Binner vs. Philipp Köster)

💯3😈3👏1

14 Sept 2025, 12:57 UTC≈2,940 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ludger K. - Wenn ich Deutschland ruinieren wollte

💯11👍4🏆21👏1

31 Aug 2025, 23:42 UTC≈2,490 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Kosmisches Murmelspiel 😉😎 (Men in Black - 1997)

🥰7😁4👍21👎1👻1

31 Aug 2025, 23:41 UTC≈8,380 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Pharmaindustrie verschweigt massive Nebenwirkungen (ARD Kontraste - 2010) Komplette Reportage: https://odysee.com/@BehindTheMatrix:7/Pharmaindustrie-verschweigt-massive-Nebenwirkungen-(ARD---Kontraste---2010):1 #BehindTheMatrix #BTM #GlaxoSmithKline #Avandia #Nebenwirkungen #Herzinfarkt

👍4👏1

7 Aug 2025, 15:09 UTC≈3,840 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Alpengletscher 8 Mal in 10.000 Jahren abgeschmolzen (ZDF 05.04.2007)

👍195🎉2👏2

30 Jul 2025, 12:45 UTC≈2,970 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Bill Gates: „Für jede Krankheit, für die wir keine Impfstoffe haben, werden wir mRNA ausprobieren“. "Wir müssen nur ein bisschen herumspielen. Es gibt viele Lipid-Nanopartikeln, und einige davon sind sehr selbstorganisierend.”

🤮132

30 Jul 2025, 07:51 UTC≈3,480 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Schöne neue Welt - Brave New World (Julian & Aldous Huxley) "Im Falle einer Wiedergeburt würde ich gerne als ein tödlicher Virus zurückkehren, um etwas zur Lösung des Problems der Überbevölkerung beizutragen." (#PrincePhilip 1988) #SchöneNeueWelt - Julian & Aldous #Huxley #BehindTheMatrix #WWF #Bilderberg #BraveNewWorld #Eugenik #Weltregierung #Huxley #Orwell #HGWells #PrincePhilip #DPA #Propaganda

5👍3

27 Jul 2025, 21:20 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Die können echt gar nix. 😂

🤣162

27 Jul 2025, 17:57 UTC≈2,770 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Sie sagen es durch ihre Filme (Smartphone Version) #BehindTheMatrix #SieSagenEsDurchIhreFilme

👍162🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @behindthematrix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,102,947 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BehindTheMatrix” (@behindthematrix), 2,522 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/behindthematrix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.