Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Base da Conversa (@igorgadioli)

Channel

Base da Conversa (@igorgadioli)

@basedaconversa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

4,747subscribers

-62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001412620822
TypeChannel
Username@basedaconversa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/basedaconversa

Growth

4,7474,8094,7787 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,806 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,795 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,787 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,777 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,763 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,753 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,747 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,738–4,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 19:584,747-6
24 Aug 2026, 14:374,753-10
21 Aug 2026, 02:284,763-14
17 Aug 2026, 18:194,777-10
14 Aug 2026, 14:484,787-8
10 Aug 2026, 22:314,795-11
8 Aug 2026, 08:014,806-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:304,809no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:224,809first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,767 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,18779.0%
👍34612.5%
👏1776.40%
🤯381.37%
🔥120.434%
🎉70.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,767reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2022 to 2 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2023, 22:23 UTC≈11,400 views145 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️ #117 Julgamento Vs. Conexão

119👍16👏10

14 Apr 2023, 21:47 UTC≈13,500 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️ #116 Negar vs. Negociar

102👍13👏7

17 Mar 2023, 21:04 UTC≈15,200 views175 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️ #115 Lidando com críticas

144👍17👏14

5 Mar 2023, 22:55 UTC≈15,900 views131 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️#114 O poder da concisão na comunicação

103👍14👏14

24 Feb 2023, 20:58 UTC≈15,600 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️#113 Discursos motivacionais não são a melhor solução

99👍10👏10🤯10

2 Feb 2023, 15:13 UTC≈15,800 views107 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️ #112 Existe algum risco em sermos assertivos?

84👍12👏6🤯5

11 Dec 2022, 20:29 UTC≈18,300 views203 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️#111 Sobre o poder da decisão

162👍23🤯11👏6🔥1

13 Nov 2022, 18:18 UTC≈18,600 views238 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️ #110 Não seja uma vítima da sua sensibilidade

198👍24👏12🤯4

6 Nov 2022, 19:27 UTC≈18,100 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️ #109 Consciência corporal e comunicação assertiva

100👍18👏3🔥1

16 Oct 2022, 22:17 UTC≈17,500 views175 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️ #108 como gerar interesse e clareza ao me comunicar?

132👍31👏9🔥3

4 Oct 2022, 16:50 UTC≈17,100 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

☝️#107 As pessoas não querem ser agradadas

141👍26👏18🎉2

30 Sept 2022, 13:13 UTC≈16,100 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💡Hoje é o último dia de inscrições no Conectar-se 🙇

👍1110

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @basedaconversa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Base da Conversa (@igorgadioli)” (@basedaconversa), 4,747 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/basedaconversa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.