Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 66 days, net +857. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 765–1,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 11:57
1,759
-40
5 Oct 2026, 21:01
1,799
-14
28 Sept 2026, 03:18
1,813
+221
18 Sept 2026, 22:00
1,592
+22
14 Sept 2026, 04:18
1,570
+40
10 Sept 2026, 15:55
1,530
+44
5 Sept 2026, 19:58
1,486
+40
2 Sept 2026, 05:04
1,446
-20
29 Aug 2026, 20:24
1,466
-16
26 Aug 2026, 20:34
1,482
-20
24 Aug 2026, 02:09
1,502
-11
20 Aug 2026, 00:22
1,513
+85
16 Aug 2026, 19:46
1,428
+480
8 Aug 2026, 11:48
948
+46
8 Aug 2026, 01:03
902
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:40
902
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,009 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
351
34.8%
🔥
274
27.2%
🤣
211
20.9%
💘
172
17.0%
😱
1
0.099%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,009 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @base_min. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Меня ещё удивляет, как быстро женщину называют меркантильной.
Захотела, чтобы мужчина заплатил за ужин - меркантильная. Спросила про планы и работу - меркантильная. Не хочет жить с человеком, который пять лет «ищет себя» - вообще продажная.
При этом от неё спокойно ждут бесплатный быт, поддержку, секс, верность, красоту и терпение))
Если мужчина видит меркантильность в любом женском ожидании, возможно, он просто з…
Я вообще не понимаю, как работает мужская математика в некоторых семьях.
Оба работают восемь часов. Оба приходят домой уставшие. Но мужчина после работы отдыхает, потому что он работал, а женщина начинает готовить, мыть, стирать и разбираться со всем остальным, потому что это почему-то «само собой».
А потом он один раз помыл посуду и ходит с лицом человека, который лично спас брак😂
Самое интересное начинается, ког…
Сейчас многие мужчины жалуются, что женщины стали холодными и не хотят «поддерживать мужчину в трудный период».
Только под трудным периодом иногда подразумевается пять лет лежать на диване, ненавидеть работу, ничего не менять и каждый вечер вываливать всё это на девушку.
Она должна выслушать, успокоить, вдохновить, вернуть веру в себя, придумать план действий и желательно ещё не выглядеть уставшей. А когда однажды …
Почему-то после измены женщины часто первым делом начинают сравнивать себя с другой. Что у неё лучше, лицо, тело, характер, секс, фиг знает что ещё. Хотя мужики изменяют и красивым, и умным, и заботливым, и вообще кому угодно)
Измена чаще говорит о человеке, который изменил, чем о том, кому изменили. Поэтому не надо разбирать себя по частям из-за чужой неспособности держать штаны застёгнутыми🤷♂️
Иногда складывается ощущение, что некоторым людям намного легче обидеться в ответ, чем просто сказать:
«Да, здесь я был неправ»
Сначала человек делает откровенную херню, пропадает, врёт, грубит, не держит слово, а потом начинается: «Ну и чего ты так реагируешь?», «Опять начинаешь», «Можно было нормально сказать». И в какой-то момент вы уже обсуждаете не то, что произошло, а то, что партнер слишком эмоционально на э…
Есть одна фраза, которую некоторые мужчины используют слишком часто:
«Я же не обязан.»
Не обязан писать. Не обязан предупреждать. Не обязан дарить цветы. Не обязан помогать. Не обязан объяснять.
Вообще-то правда. Не обязан.
Но тогда и ты не обязана оставаться рядом с человеком, который всё время живёт по принципу «не обязан»)
🔥42💯11💘4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @base_min. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“базовый минимум” (@base_min), 1,759 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/base_min.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.