Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Barbello πŸŽ€

Channel

Barbello πŸŽ€

@barbello_oo1

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

3,173subscribers

-159 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002376353600
TypeChannel
Username@barbello_oo1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/barbello_oo1

Growth

3,1733,3323,252.57 August 2026 β€” 3,332 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 3,332 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 3,329 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 3,311 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 3,294 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 3,269 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 3,246 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 3,229 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 3,212 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 3,200 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 3,194 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 3,173 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,149–3,356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 13:223,173-21
1 Sept 2026, 08:363,194-6
29 Aug 2026, 14:073,200-12
26 Aug 2026, 19:273,212-17
24 Aug 2026, 02:353,229-17
20 Aug 2026, 21:073,246-23
17 Aug 2026, 23:523,269-25
14 Aug 2026, 22:383,294-17
11 Aug 2026, 11:333,311-18
8 Aug 2026, 01:513,329-3
7 Aug 2026, 16:163,332no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:063,332first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 October 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

742 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀36649.3%
🍌22530.3%
πŸ’‹456.06%
πŸ’˜243.23%
πŸ‘233.10%
😁172.29%
πŸ”₯162.16%
πŸ‘Ύ70.943%
🌭50.674%
❀‍πŸ”₯20.27%
πŸŽƒ20.27%
πŸ’―20.27%
😍20.27%
🀣20.27%
πŸ₯°20.27%
πŸ‘10.135%
πŸ’”10.135%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 742 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 7 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
217
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 15 we hold a reading for Β· 33%
Most on one post
206
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @barbello_oo1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 October 2025 to 7 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2025, 04:57 UTCβ‰ˆ23,700 views81 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

ΠšΠ°ΠΉΡ„

❀45🍌27πŸ‘5πŸ’˜4

7 Oct 2025, 04:44 UTCβ‰ˆ23,000 views82 reactions206 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀46πŸ‘16🍌15πŸ’˜5

6 Oct 2025, 12:20 UTCβ‰ˆ19,300 views96 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Π‘Π°Ρ‡ ΡΡ€Π°ΡˆΠΈΠ±ΠΌΠΈ ?

❀51🍌28πŸ‘Ύ7πŸ”₯5πŸŽƒ2😍2πŸ’˜1

5 Oct 2025, 15:01 UTCβ‰ˆ17,900 views101 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀57🍌27πŸ’‹12πŸ’˜5

5 Oct 2025, 11:16 UTCβ‰ˆ13,900 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❀14🍌3

5 Oct 2025, 11:13 UTCβ‰ˆ12,400 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Π‘ΠΎΠ»Π½Ρ‹ΡˆΠΊΠΎ β˜€οΈ

❀17

4 Oct 2025, 18:32 UTCβ‰ˆ12,000 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

πŸ”‰

❀22🍌6πŸ’‹6πŸ”₯4πŸ₯°2πŸ’”1

4 Oct 2025, 16:03 UTCβ‰ˆ10,800 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀15🍌8🌭3πŸ’˜2

4 Oct 2025, 11:35 UTCβ‰ˆ10,200 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΡ‹ Π·Π²ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π² наш ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ хотя Π±Ρ‹ ΠžΠ”ΠΠ ΠšΠΠŸΠ›Π― алкоголя

❀5😁4πŸ’―2

4 Oct 2025, 11:30 UTCβ‰ˆ9,490 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🀣🀣🀣

😁13🍌8❀3

4 Oct 2025, 09:05 UTCβ‰ˆ9,240 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀33🍌33πŸ’‹18πŸ”₯5❀‍πŸ”₯2🌭2πŸ’˜1

4 Oct 2025, 09:02 UTCβ‰ˆ11,800 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❀9πŸ‘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @barbello_oo1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions β€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œBarbello πŸŽ€β€ (@barbello_oo1), 3,173 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barbello_oo1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.