2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,271–1,273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 22:47
1,272
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:24
1,272
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 1,272 subscribers
Avg views / post
247
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
19 (31 December 2025 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
494
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
69
Videos
15
Links
14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
20m 29s
Average length
6m 50s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
271 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
107
39.5%
🔥
68
25.1%
❤
24
8.86%
👍
23
8.49%
🤣
23
8.49%
🆒
7
2.58%
💯
6
2.21%
😢
6
2.21%
custom 5429197991992899022
2
0.738%
🤬
2
0.738%
👎
1
0.369%
🤔
1
0.369%
🫡
1
0.369%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌄 Код ИБ ПРОФИ — выездной интенсив по кибербезопасности в формате «три дня учебы, три дня приключений».
🗓 9-13 сентября 2026
📍 Сочи, курорт «Роза Хутор»
Что ждет участников?
• Практические мастер-классы от CISO Сбербанка, Яндекса, VK, Билайна, Озон Банка, Райффайзенбанка и других ведущих компаний. Эксперты разберут реальные кейсы и подходы, которые редко обсуждаются публично.
• Киберучения в штабе и на киберполиг…
Если трудовые будни😶
превратились в день сурка😳
И не радуют вас больше
Умных блогеров посты,😎
Нужно срочно принять меры
Сейф открыть и изучить,😼
Что осталось с того года,
Не допитым в уголке.🍾
Ну а если это тоже,
Вам совсем не помогло,😰
Поезжайте в Розу Хутор,⛷️
В сентябре опять там движ.🤩
Вас посадят на каное,🚣
Выдадут модель угроз,📚
Для растопки у палатки
Под шашлык костра большого.🔥
И расскажут на ночь глядя,
Вам …
Если ваш наследник👦 летом,
Тупо долбит мячом в стенку ⛹️♂️, Отвлекая от просмотра битв за кубок золотой⚽️.
Есть прекрасное местечко🏕,
Где его полезным делом🖥,
Увлекут, займут, научат,
И покажут, что к чему🧘♂️.
В сентябре, вернувшись в школу, будет очень популярным✅,
ведь легко кого угодно,
Вычислит он по айпи🤩.
________
Мои друзья из МГТУ им. Баумана❤️ замутили шикарную штуку. Летний лагерь для школьников 7-11 клас…
`
Залипая над скрижалью,
С мутной схемой сетевой,
Что до вавилонской башни,
Была создана в ИТ.
Ты махни на это дело,
Нужно разом все решать,
Найди кабель самый толстый,
Подпили его немножко...
Пусть побегают потом.
_______
А если вы хотите точно знать, что ваши сетевые схемы не времен Моисея, и хотите правильно составить модель угроз, опираясь только на актуальную информацию, наши друзья из netopia.pro (NETOPIA)
раз…
Говорят, ИИ создали,
Уязвимости находит,
Так, что самый лучший хакер,
Просто как обычный школьник.
В общем, сильно не старайся,
Программируй, как пойдет,
Ведь в конце концов ИИшка,
Место и твое займет!
Собираясь харакири,
После инцидента сделать,
Не забудь отчет подробный,
Маркетологу послать.
Ведь когда ты отказался,
Отмахнувшись от страшилок,
Повнедрять крутые штуки,
Тихо плакал он в углу.
_____________________________________________
А еще у меня есть классный стишок от подписчицы, у которой свой канал (t.me/cyberbez_pmm) про маркетинг ИБ). На мой взгляд, эта область ИБ не заслуженно в тени.
Маркетолог кибербе…
Проектируя систему,
Экономьте свой бюджет,
Не нужны тебе бэкапы,
И затраты на ИБ.
Все тупые документы,
Запихай скорее в шкаф,
Ведь задача основная,
Выполнить свой KPI.
Ну а если вдруг случится,
Очень страшный инцидент,
Или просто шифровальщик,
Уничтожит бизнес весь,
Поскорее собирайся,
Обновляй-ка резюме,
Добавляя в него строчку,
«Трансформация ИТ».
А если вы хотите узнать больше, что же делать в таких случаях, у ко…
😁18❤6👍5custom 54291979919928990222
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @badofis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Думаю пора задать этот вопрос... Переносить канал в МАХ?
Да12%
Нет56%
Дублировать32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вредные советы по ИБ ❄️☃️” (@badofis), 1,272 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/badofis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
