Channel
Bad(er)buzz
@baderbuzz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,964subscribers
-197 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001260121284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baderbuzz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baderbuzz |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 6,964 | -11 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:37 | 6,975 | -18 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 6,993 | -40 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 7,033 | -23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 7,056 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 7,072 | -17 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 7,089 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 7,103 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 7,115 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 7,131 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 7,142 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 7,142 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 7,159 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 7,161 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@eclaireurinfo · 33,130
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 4 September 2026
@snp_intel · 103,494
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
@iamshad78 · 35,986
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 1 September 2026
@lazoneinterdite_off · 36,183
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bad(er)buzz” (@baderbuzz), 6,964 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baderbuzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.