Education โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@bac2027_combattrejusqualafin was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today โ only that this channel no longer does.
@bac2027_combattrejusqualafin held 8 August 2026 โ 8 August 2026
Growth
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net -385. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 19,362โ20,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:01
19,637
-13
15 Sept 2026, 19:56
19,650
-2
14 Sept 2026, 04:37
19,652
+40
12 Sept 2026, 09:19
19,612
+35
10 Sept 2026, 05:40
19,577
+81
6 Sept 2026, 19:58
19,496
+12
4 Sept 2026, 04:41
19,484
+28
3 Sept 2026, 01:45
19,456
no change
3 Sept 2026, 01:30
19,456
+8
2 Sept 2026, 01:58
19,448
-36
1 Sept 2026, 03:35
19,484
+4
31 Aug 2026, 04:28
19,480
-1
30 Aug 2026, 02:33
19,481
-22
28 Aug 2026, 23:25
19,503
-23
27 Aug 2026, 23:56
19,526
-17
26 Aug 2026, 22:56
19,543
-40
25 Aug 2026, 21:14
19,583
-18
24 Aug 2026, 20:27
19,601
-45
23 Aug 2026, 07:02
19,646
-47
21 Aug 2026, 16:15
19,693
first reading
Engagement
104 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
1.05%
avg views รท 19,637 subscribers
Avg views / post
207
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 104 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
104 (3 August 2026 โ 2 September 2026)
Views total
7,240
Reactions total
190
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
2m 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
703 reactions across 88 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
497
70.7%
๐ญ
52
7.40%
๐ฅ
34
4.84%
๐
22
3.13%
๐
21
2.99%
๐
19
2.70%
๐คฉ
12
1.71%
๐
10
1.42%
๐
8
1.14%
โคโ๐ฅ
7
0.996%
๐
5
0.711%
๐ค
5
0.711%
๐
3
0.427%
๐
3
0.427%
๐
3
0.427%
๐ฏ
2
0.284%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 703 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 100 we hold a reading for ยท 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @bac2027_combattrejusqualafin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 104 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed ๐งธ๐ ุฃูููููููููููููููููุดู ๐
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @bac2027_combattrejusqualafin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@bac2027_combattrejusqualafin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
@chadanadji named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 โ 25 August 2026
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
AYA AYA 897 (BAC) @AYA_AYA_897_bac ยท 22,665 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 20 September 2026
๐ฆ๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ณ @rraaaayhh ยท 25,327 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here โ alongside 78 others โ read 15 September 2026
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐ฌ๐ง๐ @bacwithselsabilez ยท 29,858 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 10 September 2026
ุฃุณุทูุฑุฉ ุงูุจุงู DZ ๐ฉ๐ฟ๐ @bac_bac_dz ยท 28,055 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 13 September 2026
ุฃุณุชุงุฐุฉ ุงูุฃุฏุจ ุงูุนุฑุจู @profnourbac2025 ยท 26,261 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 13 September 2026
Study Guide๐ฅ @studyguide13 ยท 23,319 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 18 September 2026
ANYA BAC 2027๐๐ @studywithanyaaa ยท 32,047 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 5 September 2026
ููุงุฉ ุงูุฃุณุชุงุฐ ู ุญู ุฏ ูุนุฑูู ุจูุงููุฑูุง @profmohamedlarouk ยท 25,356 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 14 September 2026
๐ฉ๐จ๐ช ๐ฐ๐บ ๐ฌ๐จ๐บ๐ ๐ง @Is_easyy ยท 29,449 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 9 September 2026
ุจูุงููุฑูุง BAC DZ TOP @bac_dztop ยท 50,873 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here โ alongside 75 others โ read 28 August 2026
BAC WITH NOUUR ๐ฉ๐ปโ๐ป! @NOURCHANNE ยท 21,045 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 25 September 2026
๐๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ง๐๐โ๏ธ | ุณุจูุทุงุฑ @hopitalbatman ยท 44,327 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here โ alongside 70 others โ read 28 August 2026
BAC AUDEN | 2026 @bacauden ยท 21,429 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 23 September 2026
๐ฆ๐ง๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ง @studyhard_dz ยท 23,094 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 19 September 2026
ุฃุณุชุงุฐ ุงูููุณูุฉ ุฃูุฑู ุบุณุงู @akramghassanphilo2023 ยท 55,437 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here โ alongside 73 others โ read 28 August 2026
Cours DZ Bac2026/2027 ุจูุงููุฑูุง _) (_ุนูุจุฉ ุจู ูุงูุน _ุงูุงุณุชุงุฐ ููุฑ ุงูุฏูู ) ๐ฉบ๐โค๐ @bacavec20 ยท 40,973 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 30 August 2026
ุนูุจุฉ ุจู ูุงูุน - ุงูุงู ุชูุงุฒ ูู ุงูุจูุงููุฑูุง - ู ุณุงุฑ ุนูู ู๐ @nafi3_bac_dz_1954 ยท 195,810 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 28 August 2026
ุงูุฃุณุชุงุฐ ูุนุฌุงู ุดุงูุฑ - ุนููู ููุฒูุงุฆูุฉ @Prof_LaadjalChaher ยท 30,647 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 7 September 2026
ุงูุฃุณุชุงุฐุฉ ูุชูู ุดุฑูู ุฒููุฉ๐ฆุจูุงููุฑูุง @profketficherif ยท 146,784 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 28 August 2026
ููุงุฉ ุงูุฃุณุชุงุฐ ุนุจุฏ ุงูุจุงุณุท @bassetprof ยท 78,293 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฉ๐จ๐ช๐ฝ๐ฌ๐๐บ๐ฌ | ๐ป๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ช ๐โ (@bac2027_combattrejusqualafin), 19,637 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BACVERSE_theuniverseofbac.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.