Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for B2BINPAY

Channel

B2BINPAY

@b2binpay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,723subscribers

-159 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001463483726
TypeChannel
Username@b2binpay
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/b2binpay

Growth

6,7236,8826,802.57 August 2026 — 6,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,882 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,860 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,821 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,792 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,771 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,736 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,723 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,699–6,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 22:376,723-13
24 Aug 2026, 05:356,736-35
20 Aug 2026, 12:376,771-21
17 Aug 2026, 11:136,792-29
14 Aug 2026, 00:596,821-39
10 Aug 2026, 12:246,860-22
7 Aug 2026, 09:266,882no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:036,882first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.06%
avg views ÷ 6,723 subscribers
Avg views / post
542
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held21 (15 May 202617 August 2026)
Views total1,084
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,417 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
77932.2%
👍63326.2%
🔥37215.4%
👌29112.0%
🐳2098.65%
❤‍🔥823.39%
361.49%
💯150.621%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,417reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @b2binpay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC434 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

The most useful line in any release notes is the one that says something stopped happening. B2BINPAY 26.2.14 is four releases’ worth of exactly that. 🔸 Deposits stopped sitting in Created for half an hour after a brief infrastructure blip. 🔸 The anonymous rates list, about 367,000 requests a day, stopped taking ~700 ms. It answers in about 6 on a cache hit, and the cache refreshes the moment quotes do. 🔸 Approval

10👍10👌6🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC650 views34 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

You should not have to ask anyone to know your fees tier. Until v26.2.10 release, B2BINPAY account owners did. The rate, the turnover behind it, the distance to the next tier: all of it lived with an account manager. Today v26.2.10 puts it in the Client UI. The new Commissions tab shows your current turnover, your tier and your rate, the full ladder above and below you, the minimum blockchain fee for every network,

11🐳10👍73🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC805 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026

B2BINPAY Product Update. Version 26.2.4 is LIVE! A withdrawal approval that times out mid-review means restarting the whole confirmation flow and a support ticket to sort it out. B2BINPAY version 26.2.6 now removes the 15-minute expiry on same-currency withdrawal approvals for Enterprise and Merchant accounts. Conversion payouts still run on a timer, but now the countdown is visible in your dashboard and ours. Also

👍138🔥7👌5💯1

14 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,080 views44 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

B2BINPAY 26.2.4 is LIVE! 🚨 The most expensive payout is the one that fails. 🚫 Your end user did everything right. The withdrawal request lands. And the operational wallet has quietly run dry, so the platform says “No”, and a routine transaction becomes a support case. 🟠 B2BINPAY 26.2.4 removes that scenario. Every wallet now has its own low-balance threshold: the balance drops below it, you get notified, you top

👍16🐳9🔥87👌4

7 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,160 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🛠 Want to Offer Crypto Wallets Without Building From Scratch? Wallet-as-a-Service gives businesses ready-made wallet creation, key management, transaction processing, and balance tracking through APIs and SDKs. 💰 WaaS can cut costs and save months of development work for exchanges, brokers, marketplaces, iGaming platforms, and e-commerce businesses 🤔 How to start? Learn from our article: 🧩 How WaaS removes the ne

24👍9🔥6🐳2👌1

3 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,440 views48 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🌍 Global Payments Need More Than a Card-First Processor Many businesses find that traditional payment processors weren’t designed for global crypto-native operations — limited asset support, slower cross-border settlements, and restrictions that don't fit modern digital commerce. ✨ A crypto payment gateway built specifically for digital assets can open payment flows that card-first infrastructure simply can't suppo

👌21👍98🐳5🔥5

1 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,310 views46 reactionsread 20 August 2026

⚙️ Still Processing Payouts Manually? As soon as your database moves from dozens to hundreds — spreadsheets, copied wallet addresses, and manual approvals become operational risks. Automate approvals ➡️ Fast payouts ➡️ better accuracy, control, and scale. 💡 Our article explains: ⚙️ How crypto payout automation reduces manual work 🌍 Why stablecoins are useful for global payroll, affiliates, suppliers 🔁 How automat

👌14👍14🔥8🐳64

29 Jun 2026, 09:08 UTC≈2,230 views142 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🛒 For E-commerce, Every Percentage Point in Costs Matters. Card fees, chargebacks, settlement holds, and reconciliation work can quietly reduce margins — especially as transaction volume grows. 💡 Here's what our article explains: 💸 How card processing fees affect online store profitability 🚫 Why crypto payments can remove card-style chargebacks ⚡️ How APIs, plugins, and hosted checkout make adoption easier Crypto

👌55👍4231🔥7🐳5💯2

25 Jun 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,440 views332 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🧩 A Crypto Payment API Does More Than Connecting Payments At scale, the wrong API can create failed webhooks, reconciliation issues, settlement delays, and compliance gaps. 🧠 The right API structure becomes the backbone of your payment infrastructure. Here's what you'll learn in our guide 💡 🔁 Why webhook reliability and idempotency matter 🧾 How unique deposit addresses improve reconciliation 🛡 Why AML and KYT sho

👍197❤‍🔥62👌3625🐳12

23 Jun 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,830 views161 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🎰 Stable, Reliable iGaming Payments Infrastructure For operators, the real cost of traditional processing goes far beyond transaction fees: rolling reserves, chargebacks, account freezes, delayed settlements, and compliance pressure can all impact cash flow. 💡 This article breaks down: ⚖️ Why licensing and KYT matter for iGaming operators 🌐 Which blockchains fit different gaming payment flows 💵 How stablecoin sett

93👌32👍18🐳12❤‍🔥4🔥2

17 Jun 2026, 09:27 UTC≈5,130 views346 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

💸 Crypto Payments Without the Bank Cuts — B2BINPAY FIAT-traditional processors take 2.5–3.5% per transaction, freeze a percentage of your revenue as rolling reserve, and hit you with chargebacks at the worst possible moments. 💳 B2BINPAY accepts crypto and settles to fiat without any of those costs. No hidden cuts, just a transparent processing fee that shrinks as your volume grows. We offer you: 🟠 Tiered processi

🔥134122👍63🐳21👌6

11 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC≈4,710 views309 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🚀 B2BINPAY is heading to iFX EXPO International 2026! 🇨🇾 We are excited to connect with the global fintech and online trading community at one of the year's biggest industry events. Ready to upgrade your payment infrastructure? We've got you covered. 📅 Dates: 16–18 June, 2026 📍 Location: City of Dreams Mediterranean, Limassol, Cyprus 🔥 Booth: #2 Our Chief Commercial Officer, Oleksandr Ryzhkin, will be at the bo

135🔥76👍52👌36🐳5❤‍🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @b2binpay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 709,590 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Banking by Rojgar With Ankit™🎖️
@bankingbyrojgarwithAnkit · 58,982
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“B2BINPAY” (@b2binpay), 6,723 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b2binpay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.