Aspis isn't one product. It's three products solving three different problems: 🏦 Secure capital with Vaults 🤖 Execute faster with AI Copilot 🧠 Analyze portfolios with AgentCouncil Our latest article explains why we built them separately and why they work better together. Read it here 👇 https://aspis.medium.com/one-suite-three-ways-to-trade-smarter-0e45b7e8ed89

Channel
Aspis - Announcement channel
@aspis_ann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
17,261subscribers
+5,888 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001710160314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aspis_ann |
| Description | Self-custodial Vaults, an AI Copilot, and multi-agent portfolio analysis in one suite. Chat: https://t.me/aspis_chat Website: https://aspis.finance Twitter: https://twitter.com/AspisProtocol |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aspis_ann |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 17,261 | -104 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 17,365 | -108 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 17,473 | -46 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 17,519 | -81 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 17,600 | -75 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 17,675 | -79 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 17,754 | -190 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 17,944 | +2,396 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 15,548 | +4,461 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 11,087 | -30 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 11,117 | -71 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 11,188 | -25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 11,213 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 11,250 | -83 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 11,333 | -40 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 11,373 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 11,373 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.8%
- avg views ÷ 17,261 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,070
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (9 March 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,070 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 266
- Videos
- 12
- Links
- 216
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Multiple agents. Multiple perspectives. One final report. https://dashboard.agentcouncil.org/
Most users only see the final report. Here’s what happens behind the scenes: 1️⃣ Market intelligence collection 2️⃣ News and evidence analysis 3️⃣ AI agent discussion 4️⃣ Technical & fundamental review 5️⃣ Consensus building 6️⃣ Final recommendations Every analysis goes through multiple validation layers before reaching a conclusion.
Aspis is no longer just one product. We’re building a complete AI-powered trading ecosystem: 🛡️ Vaults 🤖 Copilot 📊 AgentCouncil Three tools. One mission: bring AI into every layer of DeFi. 🚀
What impacts your performance the most?
- A) Overtrading99%
- B) Poor timing0%
- C) Lack of discipline0%
- D) Risk mismanagement0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What impacts your performance the most?
As markets mature, competitive advantage shifts away from information access and toward execution quality and system design. This is where AI-driven tools will play a key role.
Your portfolio has blind spots. Agent Council shows them.
AI in trading is not about replacing decision-making. It’s about: 🔘 structuring data 🔘 reducing noise 🔘 improving consistency Aspis Copilot is built to support exactly that layer.
Most crypto investors track prices. Professionals track risk. With Agent Council, you get: ✅ A clear risk score ✅ Portfolio weaknesses ✅ Actionable rebalancing insights No noise. Just decisions.
🚨 Security Alert: Aave Exposure via KelpDAO Exploit A major DeFi exploit (~$290M) just hit KelpDAO’s rsETH bridge. The attacker used unbacked rsETH as collateral on Aave to borrow real ETH/WETH — creating up to ~$200M in bad debt. Important: • Aave itself was NOT hacked • Affected markets (rsETH) are frozen • Liquidity stress is already visible ⚠️ If you have funds in Aave: – Review your exposure (especially wETH…
Most crypto tools show you data. Agent Council shows you what it actually means. Wallet activity → analyzed by AI agents Patterns → explained Risks → highlighted Next steps → suggested Your wallet finally makes sense.
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @aspis_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What impacts your performance the most?
- A) Overtrading99%
- B) Poor timing0%
- C) Lack of discipline0%
- D) Risk mismanagement0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What would you want AI to analyze about your wallet?
- Risk score38%
- Trading habits20%
- Portfolio diversification14%
- Hidden opportunities28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How often do you actually review your portfolio performance?
- Every day25%
- Once a week21%
- When the market dumps37%
- Never17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aspis - Announcement channel” (@aspis_ann), 17,261 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aspis_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.