Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aspis - Announcement channel

Channel

Aspis - Announcement channel

@aspis_ann

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

17,261subscribers

+5,888 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710160314
TypeChannel
Username@aspis_ann
DescriptionSelf-custodial Vaults, an AI Copilot, and multi-agent portfolio analysis in one suite. Chat: https://t.me/aspis_chat Website: https://aspis.finance Twitter: https://twitter.com/AspisProtocol
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aspis_ann

Growth

11,08717,94414,515.57 August 2026 — 11,373 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,373 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,333 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,213 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,188 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,117 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,548 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,944 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,754 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,675 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,600 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,519 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,473 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,365 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,261 subscribers17,2617 August 202623 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net +5,888. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,058–18,973 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 14:1617,261-104
22 Aug 2026, 00:3717,365-108
20 Aug 2026, 19:5817,473-46
19 Aug 2026, 21:3517,519-81
18 Aug 2026, 21:1517,600-75
17 Aug 2026, 23:1517,675-79
16 Aug 2026, 21:4217,754-190
15 Aug 2026, 17:0417,944+2,396
14 Aug 2026, 05:1715,548+4,461
13 Aug 2026, 00:1511,087-30
11 Aug 2026, 22:3211,117-71
10 Aug 2026, 21:4211,188-25
10 Aug 2026, 00:4311,213-37
8 Aug 2026, 23:3011,250-83
7 Aug 2026, 23:0511,333-40
7 Aug 2026, 09:0011,373no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:5611,373first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 9 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 17,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (9 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,070
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
266
Videos
12
Links
216

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,070 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Aspis isn't one product. It's three products solving three different problems: 🏦 Secure capital with Vaults 🤖 Execute faster with AI Copilot 🧠 Analyze portfolios with AgentCouncil Our latest article explains why we built them separately and why they work better together. Read it here 👇 https://aspis.medium.com/one-suite-three-ways-to-trade-smarter-0e45b7e8ed89

22 Jun 2026, 15:06 UTC≈8,970 viewsread 23 August 2026
Video

Multiple agents. Multiple perspectives. One final report. https://dashboard.agentcouncil.org/

5 Jun 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,900 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @AgentCouncilPhoto

Most users only see the final report. Here’s what happens behind the scenes: 1️⃣ Market intelligence collection 2️⃣ News and evidence analysis 3️⃣ AI agent discussion 4️⃣ Technical & fundamental review 5️⃣ Consensus building 6️⃣ Final recommendations Every analysis goes through multiple validation layers before reaching a conclusion.

20 May 2026, 18:11 UTC≈4,290 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Aspis is no longer just one product. We’re building a complete AI-powered trading ecosystem: 🛡️ Vaults 🤖 Copilot 📊 AgentCouncil Three tools. One mission: bring AI into every layer of DeFi. 🚀

12 May 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,930 viewsread 23 August 2026
Poll

What impacts your performance the most?

  1. A) Overtrading99%
  2. B) Poor timing0%
  3. C) Lack of discipline0%
  4. D) Risk mismanagement0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 May 2026, 18:40 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

As markets mature, competitive advantage shifts away from information access and toward execution quality and system design. This is where AI-driven tools will play a key role.

29 Apr 2026, 12:34 UTC≈2,610 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @AgentCouncilPhoto

Your portfolio has blind spots. Agent Council shows them.

26 Apr 2026, 02:40 UTC894 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

AI in trading is not about replacing decision-making. It’s about: 🔘 structuring data 🔘 reducing noise 🔘 improving consistency Aspis Copilot is built to support exactly that layer.

22 Apr 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @AgentCouncilPhoto

Most crypto investors track prices. Professionals track risk. With Agent Council, you get: ✅ A clear risk score ✅ Portfolio weaknesses ✅ Actionable rebalancing insights No noise. Just decisions.

19 Apr 2026, 15:16 UTC907 viewsread 23 August 2026

🚨 Security Alert: Aave Exposure via KelpDAO Exploit A major DeFi exploit (~$290M) just hit KelpDAO’s rsETH bridge. The attacker used unbacked rsETH as collateral on Aave to borrow real ETH/WETH — creating up to ~$200M in bad debt. Important: • Aave itself was NOT hacked • Affected markets (rsETH) are frozen • Liquidity stress is already visible ⚠️ If you have funds in Aave: – Review your exposure (especially wETH

18 Apr 2026, 15:57 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @AgentCouncilPhoto

Most crypto tools show you data. Agent Council shows you what it actually means. Wallet activity → analyzed by AI agents Patterns → explained Risks → highlighted Next steps → suggested Your wallet finally makes sense.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @aspis_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 May 2026, 15:12 UTCAnonymous Poll548 voters

What impacts your performance the most?

  1. A) Overtrading99%
  2. B) Poor timing0%
  3. C) Lack of discipline0%
  4. D) Risk mismanagement0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Apr 2026, 16:50 UTCAnonymous Poll545 voters

What would you want AI to analyze about your wallet?

  1. Risk score38%
  2. Trading habits20%
  3. Portfolio diversification14%
  4. Hidden opportunities28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Mar 2026, 19:12 UTCAnonymous Poll270 voters

How often do you actually review your portfolio performance?

  1. Every day25%
  2. Once a week21%
  3. When the market dumps37%
  4. Never17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aspis - Announcement channel” (@aspis_ann), 17,261 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aspis_ann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.