Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اصل مطلب‎

Channel

اصل مطلب‎

@aslematlabiha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,295subscribers

+315 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002926450825
TypeChannel
Username@aslematlabiha
Description♟️ درباره کتاب‎های اصل مطلب برای آمادگی در آزمون‌های پره‎انترنی و دستیاری پزشکی 🔻 عرفان شیرمحمدی - رزیدنت چشم شهید بهشتی؛ مدال نقره المپیاد زیست، دانش‌آموخته پزشکی تهران پشتیبانی جهت تهیه کتاب‌ها: 🧤 @AvidMDSup گروه ما: ⛓️ @KamNemiarim
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aslematlabiha

Growth

6,9807,2957,137.57 August 2026 — 6,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,008 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,095 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,212 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,295 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +315. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,933–7,342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:547,295+83
14 Aug 2026, 18:387,212+117
11 Aug 2026, 01:377,095+87
7 Aug 2026, 16:247,008+28
7 Aug 2026, 06:456,980no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:336,980first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.4%
avg views ÷ 7,295 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,900
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held23 (25 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total89,660
Reactions total834
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
207
Videos
20
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

834 reactions across 23 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44453.2%
❤‍🔥14417.3%
👏678.03%
😍566.71%
🔥536.35%
😡425.04%
👌91.08%
🤣60.719%
🥰50.6%
🤔40.48%
👍20.24%
😁20.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC≈1,220 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

نمونه صفحات اصل مطلب نورولوژی

4❤‍🔥4🔥4

17 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,620 views25 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

اصل مطلب نورولوژی (بر مبنای رفرنس جدید آزمون دستیاری و پره‎انترنی) منتشر شد! ♟ واقعا مگر میشد نورولوژی رو بدون تصویر فهمید؟ بیش از صد و پنجاه تصویر برای بیماری‎های مختلف این مبحث ساختیم تا فهم بیماری‎های پیچیده و متنوع این درس ساده‎تر بشه: بیمار میوزیت اینکلوژن بادی چطور میاد به کلینیک یا اورژانس؟ مگر میشه فقط با خوندن چهار تا علامت حفظ کرد که این بیمار چه سناریویی داره؟ اینجا اصل مطلب یه تفاوت جدی برای شما میسازه.

20🔥3❤‍🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈2,080 views50 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

اصل مطلب نورولوژی (رفرنس جدید- امینوف)؛ فردا راس ساعت شش عصر.

😍31❤‍🔥12🔥7

15 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,830 views120 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

شنیدن خبر درگذشت یکی از دوستانمون حین کشیک اینترنی در دانشگاه تهران؛ رمق رو از ما گرفته. دکتر رحمانی عزیز؛ هیچ حرفی نمیشه زد، جز سکوت هر صحبتی گزافه هست. تنها چیزی که میتونیم بگیم این هست اگر به عنوان اینترن/ پزشک / رزیدنت تحت فشار روانی هستید، در یک جو بی‌رحمانه دارید خرد میشید یا در یک محیط مسموم گیر افتادید؛ به ما پیام بدید. گوش میدیم. شرایط اجتماعی و اقتصادی مساعد فروپاشیست، جامعه پزشکی فعلا همراهی جز خودش نداره.

115👌4🤣1

15 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈2,810 views55 reactionsread 18 August 2026

سلام؛ کلید جدید برای آزمون دستیاری امسال مجددا منتشر شد. ۵ سوال جدید حذف شده و ۱ سوال هم مجددا کلیدش تغییر کرده. در مجموع ۱۰ سوال حذف شدن از آزمون امسال. چه کنیم. در سیستمی که تمام اجزاش مثل ساعت اشتباه کار میکنن، اینها طبیعت ماجرا هستن نه یک اتفاق غیر عادی و عجیب. امیدواریم با این تغییرات نتیجه بهتر از پیش برای همه شما شده باشه.

😡4211😁2

12 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈3,980 views119 reactionsread 18 August 2026

دوستان عزیز؛ ترجمه کامل امینوف (رفرنس جدید نورولوژی) به فارسی؛ همزمان با انتشار اصل مطلب آن؛ به رایگان در همین کانال منتشر خواهد شد. شما برای ما «منبع درآمد» نیستید و هدف از این کانال کمک به طی کردن این مسیر است نه ارتزاق از اضطراب نبود منبع مناسب. اگر سبک و سیاق اصل مطلب‎ها را میپسندید؛ که اصل مطلب آن را تهیه کنید. در غیر این صورت میتوانید ترجمه ما از رفرنس (همراه با شکل‎هایش!) را به رایگان از همین کانال مطالعه کرده

👏5649❤‍🔥14

12 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈3,970 views26 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

از اصل مطلب نورولوژی (به زودی)؛ خیلی از مطالب بیماری‌های مختلف در کتاب امینوف به صورت پراکنده در فصول مختلف ذکر شدن؛ ما تمام این مطالب رو جمع‌بندی کردیم و یکجا در سناریو و توضیحات بیماری آوردیم.

19🥰5😍2

11 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈4,170 views32 reactionsread 18 August 2026

آیا اصل مطلب برای داوطلبان دستیاری، پره‌انترنی و استاجرها واقعا میتونه مفید باشه؟ مسئله‌ای که همیشه با انتشار یک رفرنس جدید دغدغه هست؛ آیا این کتاب واقعا به‌ اندازه‌ای که ادعا میکنه خوب و قابل اتکا هست؟ یا این فقط یک کیسه‌ای هست که عده‌ای برای جیب ما پهن کردن؟ اصلا چرا باید به کتاب‌هایی که جدید منتشر میشن، اعتماد کرد؟ چه کسی تضمین میکنه با خوندن این کتاب‌ها نتیجه میگیریم؟ به نظر میرسه با جدی‌تر شدن مسئله آموزش پزش

24❤‍🔥4🔥4

10 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈4,210 views33 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

مسئله فقط خلاصه کردن یک رفرنس نیست.

🔥1910🤔4

9 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈4,160 views34 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Voice message

چه خبر از اصل مطلب‌های جدید؟ اخبار خوب خیلی زود!

❤‍🔥23🔥6👌5

4 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈5,970 views32 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

اصل مطلب نورولوژی، به زودی ...

21❤‍🔥7😍4

1 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈6,720 views41 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

اصل مطلب نورولوژی بر اساس رفرنس جدید دستیاری و پره‌انترنی‌های پیش رو (امینف)، به زودی با همان سبک همیشگی اصل مطلب به دستتان خواهد رسید. با وجود افزایش هزینه‌ها، تاکنون تمام تلاشمان را کردیم تا قیمت‌ها ثابت بماند؛ اما برای حفظ و ارتقای کیفیت خدمات، پس از انتشار کتاب نورولوژی ناچار به افزایش قیمت مجموعه‌های تدریس و کتاب‌ها در سال جدید هستیم؛ تغییری که کاملاً برخلاف میل و روند اصل مطلب خواهد بود اما ناچار به انجام آن د

20😍15❤‍🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @aslematlabiha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,479,877 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اصل مطلب‎” (@aslematlabiha), 7,295 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aslematlabiha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.