Channel
@artsywhole
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,264subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001745211480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artsywhole |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artsywhole |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 1,264 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 1,268 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,269 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 1,269 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
207 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 27.1% | |
| 😁 | 45 | 21.7% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 4.83% | |
| 🗿 | 8 | 3.86% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 2.90% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 2.42% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.93% | |
| custom 5285368264623397945 | 2 | 0.966% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.483% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.483% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 22 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
стало любопытно, как относитесь к тестовым заданиям. пишите ваши wild истории в комменты 😏 вот моя — чуваки хотели получить не роадмап исследования, а конкретно конкурентный анализ по одной из компаний конкурентов. удивились, когда были посланы нахуй
😁12❤5🔥4👎1😡1
Какое время на выполнение тестового задания вы были бы готовы потратить?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗿5🔥3🫡3
Куда сходить: Куча Сегодня (20.12) и завтра (21.12) состоится маркет независимых издательств и андеграундного искусства «Куча». Названием отсылает к одноименной акции Андрея Монастырского. В оригинальной версии «Куча» была собрана из предметов, которые оставили 44 участника. Ребята делают «Кучу куч» из 44 столов современных художн_иц и независимых издатель_ниц, представляющих актуальные эксперименты с книгоизданием…
❤6👍2🔥2🫡2
Иногда ругаюсь на Яндекс, как будто это моя бывшая girlfriend, которая меня обидела. Но там, в этой company, работают очень много wonderful people. Поэтому я share этим folder, которые ведут бывшие и current employees этой corporation. Вы можете узнать разные insights про work в IT-сфере, какой у них lifestyle, как они делают fun в своей life. Folder вот тут, советую add к себе.
❤30🔥27😁27🗿2
Куда сходить: Винзавод В силу своей деятельности я часто бываю на разных вернисажах. Решил поделиться с вами. На мой взгляд, Винзавод сейчас предлагает 2 интересных выставки. 1. Персональная выставка «Внутри мягкого золота» Елены Аносовой в галерее Pennlab. Это финальная глава десятилетнего проекта о русско-эвенкийской общине охотников в бассейне Нижней Тунгуски. Выставка объединяет шелкографии на основе речных ру…
❤13🔥6👍5💔1😍1
Небольшой фото-отчёт с открытия нашей с Окоёмом выставки «Архитектура фантазии». Первый опыт подобного масштаба. Было очень тревожно и очень радостно. Спасибо всем, кто пришел! Настоятельно рекомендую посетить, пока есть такая возможность, выставку Якова Чернихова в Еврейском музее и центре толерантности. И если будет желание, наша инсталляция стоим рядышком — на мансарде.
🔥12❤8😍4👍3🗿1🫡1
Эффект зловещей долины — это когда объект почти как человек, но из‑за мелких «сбоев» во внешности или движении он вызывает тревогу и отвращение. Название связано с графиком, который придумал Масахиро Мори: если отложить по оси X «похожесть на человека», а по оси Y — «симпатию», кривая сначала растёт, но затем резко проваливается вниз. Кривая «проваливается вниз», потому что при почти человеческом сходстве мозг заме…
❤7😁6💔3🔥2custom 52853682646233979452
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @artsywhole. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое время на выполнение тестового задания вы были бы готовы потратить?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 22 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кир | UX & other bullshit” (@artsywhole), 1,264 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artsywhole.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.