1/2 первый ордер в 00:00 ботом success, все что после 9 секунд (или около того) фейл на байбите, в том числе мой ручной ордер на 6 минуте) похоже все же надо было заносить побольше
❤3👍1

Channel
@artemmdaily
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,389subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001716848224 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artemmdaily |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artemmdaily |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 2,389 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 2,396 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 2,398 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 2,403 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 2,403 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
192 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 90 | 46.9% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 18.8% | |
| 🤗 | 11 | 5.73% | |
| 🎄 | 10 | 5.21% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 4.69% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 4.17% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 3.65% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.56% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.521% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.521% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.521% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.521% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.521% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.521% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2024 to 12 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artemmdaily. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 February 2024 to 12 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
1/2 первый ордер в 00:00 ботом success, все что после 9 секунд (или около того) фейл на байбите, в том числе мой ручной ордер на 6 минуте) похоже все же надо было заносить побольше
❤3👍1
на байбите кстати все еще Pending даже для первых 100 ордеров, лишь бы не рефнули
👍4😁1
#21 orderId дай бог площадка для рагов не рагнет
❤2🐳1🔥1
Уволился из EU крипто компании? Последний год помимо традиционной крипты я работал фуллтайм девом в eu крипто стартапе/команде, но решил что больше не хочу брать на себя просто роль разработчика, даже со всеми бонусами которые есть и могли бы быть. Конечно, для снг майндсета я получал неплохие доп деньги, и даже на каких-нибудь патриках я был бы eligible в отношении ебанутых запросов женщин (aka "сколько должен зар…
❤23🐳4👍4🙈1
Сегодня мне исполнилось 22 года, 2024 вышел заебись, но дальше лучше, 5x за год к банку (+1x только за сегодня). Это все хорошо, конечно, но было непросто и я все еще полный лузер в плане новых эмоций, что мне обязательно нужно исправлять. Больше путешествий, больше знакомств, больше движа, больше проектов. 2025 bullish vibes, с наступающим! ❤️
❤21🎄8☃5
2021 передаёт привет, оказывается Bluefin дали 1600 $BLUE бейз дроп (600$ по текущим) за Trader Alliance и Firefly Pioneer NFT, затраты на акки не помню, но вроде < 50$. Плюс баночка икры к нг, если забыли про этот дроп, но заклеймить сейчас можно только 50% токенов. https://trade.bluefin.io/airdrop
❤8☃1🎄1
На всякий случай, спросил я в саппорте OKX насчет нового закона о регуляции от ЕС (faq от OKX тут), что ж, к ru/ua все это не относится пока что, так что хилимся, живем. Чуть подробнее об этом ещё написал Имуна в своем посте.
❤6👍2☃1🎄1
Вообще было бы конечно супер, если они бы ещё дропнули хотя бы по 100 $ALEO за каждый деплой контракта, которых у нас в дорого было мб где-то 15к, но они решили этого не делать (зато выделили миллионы $ на Coinbase Quests). В целом, мой пост вышел слишком большой, сюда же ещё можно добавить парочку небольших приколов, по типу того, что CEO в ручную проверяет kyc'ы, но да ладно. Думаю того, что есть сейчас в посте до…
❤3🦄1😁1
Лок в алео = миф Мало кто знает, но у алео на самом деле нет никаких локов на дроп, он вообще unimplemented! в чейне. И делать с токенами ты можешь что угодно, хоть продать их сразу же (что сейчас и делают). Лок условный, ты соглашаешься на него перед клеймом и несешь "юридическую" ответственность за несоблюдение условий клиффа. Не буду ничего утверждать наверняка, но, скорее всего, тебе ничего не будет за нарушен…
❤10🔥2❤🔥1👍1🤷♀1
Если контрибьютили в веб3 проекты, можете посмотреть свой дроп. На отс предложений особо нет. https://claim.fluence.network/
🤗7❤2👻1
OKX dao кормит стабильно 🫡 и теперь ещё Паша Дуров будет.
👍4❤2🤗1
Тем временем в parcl 🤓 из всех дефи помоек я закинул меньше всего. Поздно или нет, но будто бы еще можно пофармить, так что делаю. Кстати, уже через 2 часа новый окх джампстарт (лучше закидывать в самом начале). Участвовал во всех прошлых и буду участвовать во всех будущих. OKX dao 🫡
👍6❤3🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artemmdaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,038,780 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@artemmdaily named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артем бака печатает...” (@artemmdaily), 2,389 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemmdaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.