Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Артем бака печатает...

Channel

Артем бака печатает...

@artemmdaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,389subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716848224
TypeChannel
Username@artemmdaily
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artemmdaily

Growth

2,3892,4032,3966 August 2026 — 2,403 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,403 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,398 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,396 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,389 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,387–2,405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:512,389-7
12 Aug 2026, 18:272,396-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:012,398-5
6 Aug 2026, 17:312,403no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:182,403first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9046.9%
👍3618.8%
🤗115.73%
🎄105.21%
🔥94.69%
🐳84.17%
73.65%
🏆42.08%
😁42.08%
🕊31.56%
21.04%
🍾21.04%
❤‍🔥10.521%
👻10.521%
🗿10.521%
🙈10.521%
🤷‍♀10.521%
🦄10.521%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2024 to 12 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artemmdaily. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 February 2024 to 12 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2025, 17:41 UTC≈1,730 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1/2 первый ордер в 00:00 ботом success, все что после 9 секунд (или около того) фейл на байбите, в том числе мой ручной ордер на 6 минуте) похоже все же надо было заносить побольше

3👍1

12 Jul 2025, 14:09 UTC≈2,880 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

на байбите кстати все еще Pending даже для первых 100 ордеров, лишь бы не рефнули

👍4😁1

12 Jul 2025, 14:01 UTC≈2,170 views4 reactions8 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#21 orderId дай бог площадка для рагов не рагнет

2🐳1🔥1

12 Jan 2025, 12:45 UTC≈3,090 views32 reactions40 Starsread 7 August 2026

Уволился из EU крипто компании? Последний год помимо традиционной крипты я работал фуллтайм девом в eu крипто стартапе/команде, но решил что больше не хочу брать на себя просто роль разработчика, даже со всеми бонусами которые есть и могли бы быть. Конечно, для снг майндсета я получал неплохие доп деньги, и даже на каких-нибудь патриках я был бы eligible в отношении ебанутых запросов женщин (aka "сколько должен зар

23🐳4👍4🙈1

31 Dec 2024, 15:52 UTC≈2,740 views34 reactions14 Starsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня мне исполнилось 22 года, 2024 вышел заебись, но дальше лучше, 5x за год к банку (+1x только за сегодня). Это все хорошо, конечно, но было непросто и я все еще полный лузер в плане новых эмоций, что мне обязательно нужно исправлять. Больше путешествий, больше знакомств, больше движа, больше проектов. 2025 bullish vibes, с наступающим! ❤️

21🎄85

28 Dec 2024, 00:03 UTC≈4,170 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2021 передаёт привет, оказывается Bluefin дали 1600 $BLUE бейз дроп (600$ по текущим) за Trader Alliance и Firefly Pioneer NFT, затраты на акки не помню, но вроде < 50$. Плюс баночка икры к нг, если забыли про этот дроп, но заклеймить сейчас можно только 50% токенов. https://trade.bluefin.io/airdrop

81🎄1

27 Dec 2024, 20:11 UTC≈3,740 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На всякий случай, спросил я в саппорте OKX насчет нового закона о регуляции от ЕС (faq от OKX тут), что ж, к ru/ua все это не относится пока что, так что хилимся, живем. Чуть подробнее об этом ещё написал Имуна в своем посте.

6👍21🎄1

22 Dec 2024, 13:50 UTC≈3,840 views5 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

Вообще было бы конечно супер, если они бы ещё дропнули хотя бы по 100 $ALEO за каждый деплой контракта, которых у нас в дорого было мб где-то 15к, но они решили этого не делать (зато выделили миллионы $ на Coinbase Quests). В целом, мой пост вышел слишком большой, сюда же ещё можно добавить парочку небольших приколов, по типу того, что CEO в ручную проверяет kyc'ы, но да ладно. Думаю того, что есть сейчас в посте до

3🦄1😁1

2 Oct 2024, 18:47 UTC≈5,780 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лок в алео = миф Мало кто знает, но у алео на самом деле нет никаких локов на дроп, он вообще unimplemented! в чейне. И делать с токенами ты можешь что угодно, хоть продать их сразу же (что сейчас и делают). Лок условный, ты соглашаешься на него перед клеймом и несешь "юридическую" ответственность за несоблюдение условий клиффа. Не буду ничего утверждать наверняка, но, скорее всего, тебе ничего не будет за нарушен

10🔥2❤‍🔥1👍1🤷‍♀1

4 Mar 2024, 12:45 UTC≈4,660 views10 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если контрибьютили в веб3 проекты, можете посмотреть свой дроп. На отс предложений особо нет. https://claim.fluence.network/

🤗72👻1

28 Feb 2024, 12:16 UTC≈3,040 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

OKX dao кормит стабильно 🫡 и теперь ещё Паша Дуров будет.

👍42🤗1

26 Feb 2024, 03:52 UTC≈2,680 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тем временем в parcl 🤓 из всех дефи помоек я закинул меньше всего. Поздно или нет, но будто бы еще можно пофармить, так что делаю. Кстати, уже через 2 часа новый окх джампстарт (лучше закидывать в самом начале). Участвовал во всех прошлых и буду участвовать во всех будущих. OKX dao 🫡

👍63🤗1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artemmdaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,038,780 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Артем бака печатает...” (@artemmdaily), 2,389 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemmdaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.