Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

artanov.ai

@artanovtech

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,328subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002718901114
TypeChannel
Username@artanovtech
DescriptionАвтоматизации n8n Обучение и наставничество
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artanovtech

Growth

7,3287,3367,3327 August 2026 — 7,336 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,336 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,334 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,328 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,327–7,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:237,328-6
8 Aug 2026, 07:007,334-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:017,336no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:597,336first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 6 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 7,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held21 (6 April 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,921
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
61
Videos
23
Links
45

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
24m 50s
Average length
4m 58s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

404 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥21453.0%
👍9623.8%
6616.3%
👏143.47%
🤩112.72%
❤‍🔥20.495%
🎉10.248%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 404reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artanovtech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC491 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Привет, друзья! 🚀 У меня вышло первое видео на YouTube: собираем первый вайбкодинг-проект с нуля Реальный веб-сервис — для примера делаем поиск виральных рилсов. Разбираем по шагам: - Оптала зарубежных сервисов - аренда VPS и подключение по SSH - GitHub и работа с Claude Code - плагин Grill от Matt Pocock - базы данных и сама разработка - Docker, GitHub Actions, Nginx - автодеплой — пушнул в репозиторий, изменени

🔥114👍3🤩1

28 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC≈1,550 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! 👋 Хочу поделиться радостью: на моём портале megaparser появились первые платные подписчики. Ещё недавно я и подумать не мог, что можно сделать веб-сервис - да ещё и с платными подписчиками. Спасибо каждому, кто оформил подписку. С момента первого релиза сервис сильно вырос. Начиналось всё с простого конструктора Telegram-ботов, а сейчас это целый набор инструментов: 🤖 Конструктор ботов - визуальный

🔥17👍42

20 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,880 views5 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026

🎙 Друзья, вышло обновление - Molvi 1.5 По вашим просьбам доработал приложение - спасибо всем, кто писал и подсказывал. Собрал самое частое из фидбека, рассказываю, что нового. Раньше, пока Molvi распознаёт речь, приходилось ждать и не переключать окна - иначе текст уходил не туда. Теперь диктуешь и спокойно занимаешься своим: переключаешь окна, листаешь браузер, отвечаешь в чате. Molvi сам запоминает, где ты начал

🔥5

12 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC≈2,370 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎙 Molvi - голосовой ввод, который работает у тебя, а не в облаке Зажал клавишу → сказал → отпустил → текст уже напечатан в активном окне. В любом приложении: мессенджер, браузер, IDE, терминал. Почему это круче подписочных аналогов (Wispr Flow, Aqua Voice): ✅ Бесплатно навсегда. Никаких $12–15 в месяц - код открыт, лицензия MIT 🔒 100% локально. Распознаёт Whisper прямо на твоём железе, аудио не покидает компьютер.

🔥27👍64

11 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTCviews —

artanov.ai pinned «Всем привет! 👋 Друзья, а вы работаете с Claude Code или Codex голосом? Надиктовывать промпты часто быстрее, чем печатать - особенно длинные ТЗ. Если да - каким приложением пользуетесь? Платите вы за него или нет ? Голосуем 👇»

11 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC≈1,920 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Всем привет! 👋 Друзья, а вы работаете с Claude Code или Codex голосом? Надиктовывать промпты часто быстрее, чем печатать - особенно длинные ТЗ. Если да - каким приложением пользуетесь? Платите вы за него или нет ? Голосуем 👇

  1. Wispr Flow43%
  2. Aqua Voice3%
  3. Да, другое приложение26%
  4. Пользовался на бесплатном периоде24%
  5. Оплачиваю ежемесячно12%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1

6 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTCviews —

artanov.ai pinned «😊😊😊😊 Привет! Здесь собрано всё самое полезное. Сохраняй и пользуйся 👇 🤖 Автоматизация и n8n ▪️ Автоматизация новостного канала с AI ▪️ Автоматический Reddit-дайджест на n8n ▪️ Дайджест из Reddit в Telegram ▪️ Как работать с API для контент-завода в n8n …»

6 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,640 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😊😊😊😊 Привет! Здесь собрано всё самое полезное. Сохраняй и пользуйся 👇 🤖 Автоматизация и n8n ▪️ Автоматизация новостного канала с AI ▪️ Автоматический Reddit-дайджест на n8n ▪️ Дайджест из Reddit в Telegram ▪️ Как работать с API для контент-завода в n8n 📡 Парсинг Telegram ▪️ Парсинг постов с публичного канала ▪️ Телеграм-парсер: собирает посты из любых каналов 🧠 AI-агенты и Claude Code ▪️ AI-ассистент для ведения

🔥144👍2

2 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC≈2,550 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ну что все уже джарвиса сделали на Fable 5 ? :)

👍5🔥3🤩3

2 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC≈2,590 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Fable 5 вернулась! ⚡️ До 7 июля модель доступна на всех платных планах - можно тратить на неё до 50% недельного лимита Как собираетесь проверять Fable 5? Какой проект запилите на ней первым делом? Пишите в комменты 👇

👍5🔥31👏1

17 Jun 2026, 05:40 UTC≈3,500 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔍 Anthropic обновил политику конфиденциальности (вступает в силу 8 июля 2026) Многие напугались формулировкой про верификацию документов. Разобрал, что там на самом деле 👇 Паспорт требуют не со всех. В политике это раздел Verification Data, и проверка включается только «в определённых обстоятельствах» - в основном это подтверждение возраста (сервис не для тех, кому до 18) или подозрение на фрод/нарушение правил. Ни

👍6👏54

16 Jun 2026, 12:47 UTC≈2,810 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Только вышел из двухнедельного отпуска. Сознательно ушёл от всего ИИ-шума, чтобы перезагрузиться. Возвращаюсь - а моим порталом megaparser.ru уже воспользовались 143 активных пользователя 🚀 Инструмент реально работает и приносит ценность. Напоминаю, что вы можете прямо сейчас и бесплатно: 🤖 Создать своего Телеграм-бота 📨 Запустить воронку через рассылку - без оплаты подписок на сторонние сервисы Что

🔥8👍41🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @artanovtech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

Всем привет! 👋 Друзья, а вы работаете с Claude Code или Codex голосом? Надиктовывать промпты часто быстрее, чем печатать - особенно длинные ТЗ. Если да - каким приложением пользуетесь? Платите вы за него или нет ? Голосуем 👇

  1. Wispr Flow43%
  2. Aqua Voice3%
  3. Да, другое приложение26%
  4. Пользовался на бесплатном периоде24%
  5. Оплачиваю ежемесячно12%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“artanov.ai” (@artanovtech), 7,328 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artanovtech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.