Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for arsip

Channel

arsip

@arsipjokas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001575460121
TypeChannel
Username@arsipjokas
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 5 July 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/arsipjokas

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
21

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2022 to 8 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2022, 12:22 UTC6 viewsread 31 August 2026

🔒 A whisper message to am1975u, Only he/she can open it.

8 Jul 2022, 12:21 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

t.me/am1975u Shaluna : fi agak gmn ya mikir nih orng keknya manusia yg santai gk serem gitu + 8,5/10 Clousie : tbh sih seru bet anaknya + pass Jingga : nih anak sih keknya gabutan mlu, trus yahh seru sih klw diajak interaksi, cmn anaknya nih agak jamet yee tp tak apalah jamet semakin didepan + cool, attractive, wow Joseph : ⤵️ + kill aja ya Khadipta : gw gatau mau ngapain sm nih anak tp keknya yaaa jajan keju di

🥰1

6 Jul 2022, 13:40 UTC13 viewsread 31 August 2026

𝗠𝗔𝗟𝗩 🧑🏻‍💼 He is a very 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗤𝗨𝗘 man ?#% 🤑 has a very attractive aura ___ 🙌🏻 He looks 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗻𝘆 and 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗹 at the same time 💀%;?? maybe if friends with him will be very 𝗘𝘅𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴? *𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵 👻 very fun maybe. Men who are hyperactive and have many topics ‼️

6 Jul 2022, 13:33 UTC12 viewsread 31 August 2026

𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗔 🌹 A very 𝗕𝗲autiful 𝗪𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗡 --- 👄 even the 𝙚𝙮𝙚𝙨 who saw it could not take their 𝙚𝙮𝙚𝙨 #%$ 🦩 The structure of his face is very 𝙋𝙚𝙍𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙏 ‼️ with pink 𝙇𝗶𝗣𝗭 💋 as a complement to 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰tion !!!!! 👹 Could he be incarnated by angel ❓🕊

6 Jul 2022, 13:24 UTC7 viewsread 31 August 2026

𝗖𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗔𝗪𝗜𝗡 ☕️ He is a man with a big heart because of his 𝗱𝗘𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗻 !!!#& 𝗖𝗼𝗼𝗟 on one side 👻,,,,, can be a man who is in 𝗟𝗹𝗼𝗢𝗩𝗲𝗲 !??? 👀 too if he is spoiled with his girlfriend 👅 𝗭𝘇𝘇𝘇 –– they look very funny 🙌🏻 Looks like a 𝗖𝗔𝗦𝗨𝗔𝗟 man but turns off his 𝗢𝗣𝗣𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗡𝗧 ☠.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arsipjokas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“arsip” (@arsipjokas). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsipjokas.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.