Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for arí♡

Channel

arí♡

@arixxxxmii

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,996subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001551961546
TypeChannel
Username@arixxxxmii
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arixxxxmii

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9963,0603,0287 August 2026 — 3,060 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,060 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,059 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,054 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,044 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,039 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,036 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,027 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,016 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,014 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,010 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,008 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,000 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,996 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,986–3,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:582,996-4
14 Sept 2026, 10:193,000-8
10 Sept 2026, 12:183,008-2
4 Sept 2026, 21:173,010-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:163,014-2
28 Aug 2026, 13:333,016-11
25 Aug 2026, 15:243,027-9
19 Aug 2026, 13:063,036-3
16 Aug 2026, 22:053,039-5
13 Aug 2026, 05:133,044-10
10 Aug 2026, 09:423,054-5
7 Aug 2026, 20:003,059-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:033,060no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:523,060first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

310 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20566.1%
🥰4514.5%
😍309.68%
🤩134.19%
💔92.90%
🐳51.61%
❤‍🔥30.968%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arixxxxmii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC78 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Румяна Pixi. Оттенок Ruby Очень легко тушуются, невесомые, при этом оттенок очень освежает, на лето топ! Опять же, я в своем макияже теперь использую только розовые оттенки румян) Пользовалась 2-3 раза, полные 1500₽ 💌Оформить заказ

7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC74 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Контуринг-стик Fenty Beauty. Оттенок 01 Amber. Идеальный холодный оттенок для скульптурирования! Пользовалась 1-2 раза, полный 1800₽ 💌Оформить заказ

7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC84 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Румяна Patrick Ta. Оттенок She’s that girl Очень красивые двойные румяна, нереально смотрятся на коже, пигментированные! Оттенок очень освежает, но я взяла себе в полноразмере, в использовании были 2-3 раза 2100₽ 💌Оформить заказ

7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC79 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Контуринг Westman Atelier. Оттенок Biscuit. Полноразмерные Очень легко тушуется, стойкий. Красивый, холодный оттенок контуринга. У меня огромное количество скульпторов, я не успеваю ими пользоваться) Использовала 2 раза, полный 2600₽ 💌Оформить заказ

7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC238 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Девочки, у меня накопилось очень много косметики, не успеваю пользоваться всем, практически все продукты без пары затестов, с коробками🫶🏼

7

7 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC439 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💌вы такая молодец, занимаетесь столькими вещами одновременно, восхищаюсь вами🤍 пусть ваше дело процветает 🫰🏻 Спасибо большое, мне очень приятно🥹❤️я еще очень многим хотела бы заниматься, но пока АльхамдулилЛах и на этом

9🐳2

7 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC461 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моя кондитерская🩷свадебные, именные, печенья на выписку, все можно заказать у меня🫶 https://t.me/laramibakeryy

8

5 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC656 viewsread 8 August 2026

💌можете скинуть ссылку на приватный канал? https://t.me/+OZOjQgelox80MTZi

5 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC665 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В привате сделала огромный обзор в кружочках на всю свою косметику, как и обещала💕

27

5 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC654 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

22

4 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC914 views40 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

И возместит Он и заменит лучшим, потому что ты проявил довольство, когда довольство не было лёгким для тебя ♥️

23💔9🥰8

4 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC767 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16🥰12🤩7

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @arixxxxmii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“arí♡” (@arixxxxmii), 2,996 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arixxxxmii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.